Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Cohen, Marc A.
2010.
The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 4,
p.
563.
Cohen, Marc A.
2012.
La aplicación restringida de Rawls en la ética de la empresa: una concepción política de la teoría de los stakeholders y de la moralidad de los mercados.
Co-herencia,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 16,
p.
145.
Bishop, John Douglas
2012.
The Limits of Corporate Human Rights Obligations and the Rights of For-Profit Corporations.
Business Ethics Quarterly,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Schumacher, E. Günter
and
Wasieleski, David M.
2013.
Institutionalizing Ethical Innovation in Organizations: An Integrated Causal Model of Moral Innovation Decision Processes.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 113,
Issue. 1,
p.
15.
Neiman, Paul
2013.
A Social Contract for International Business Ethics.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 114,
Issue. 1,
p.
75.
Byerly, Robin T
2013.
BusinessINSociety: The Social Contract Revisited.
Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
4.
Hsieh, Nien-hê
2015.
The Social Contract Model of Corporate Purpose and Responsibility.
Business Ethics Quarterly,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 04,
p.
433.
Singer, Abraham
2015.
There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance.
Business Ethics Quarterly,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Frynas, Jędrzej George
and
Stephens, Siân
2015.
Political Corporate Social Responsibility: Reviewing Theories and Setting New Agendas.
International Journal of Management Reviews,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
483.
Degli Antoni, Giacomo
Faillo, Marco
FranccssGGmez, Pedro
and
Sacconi, Lorenzo
2016.
Distributive Justice with Production and the Social Contract. An Experimental Study.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Fia, Magali
and
Sacconi, Lorenzo
2017.
Justice and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Rawlsian Social Contract and Sen's Capabilities Approach.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
de Jonge, Alice
2018.
Corporate Social Responsibility Through a Feminist Lens: Domestic Violence and the Workplace in the 21st Century.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 148,
Issue. 3,
p.
471.
de Jonge, Alice
2019.
Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics.
p.
1.
Fia, Magali
and
Sacconi, Lorenzo
2019.
Justice and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Rawlsian Social Contract and Sen’s Capabilities Approach.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 160,
Issue. 4,
p.
937.
Francés-Gómez, Pedro
2019.
Handbook of Business Legitimacy.
p.
1.
Francés-Gómez, Pedro
2020.
Handbook of Business Legitimacy.
p.
277.
SCHREMPF-STIRLING, Judith
and
VAN BUREN, Harry J.
2020.
Business and Human Rights Scholarship in Social Issues in Management: An Analytical Review.
Business and Human Rights Journal,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
28.
Phillips, Robert
and
Schrempf-Stirling, Judith
2022.
Young’s Social Connection Model and Corporate Responsibility.
Philosophy of Management,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
315.
Dierksmeier, Claus
2022.
Drop Rawls?.
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
281.
Ucaryilmaz Deibel, Talya
2022.
Corporate Social Responsibility in the Legal Framework of Global Value Chains.
Law and Development Review,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
329.