Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:24:25.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Feminine Firm: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

John Dobson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this comment I challenge two of the arguments made in the paper, “Toward the Feminine Firm.” First I challenge the claim that Gilligan's work on gender differences in moral orientation provides a logically and empirically sound foundation for an alternative theory of the firm. I cite recent work that discredits any concise notion of a feminine ethic. Second I challenge the claim that, if such a firm were to exist, it would flourish in a competitive market economy. I suggest that, far from flourishing, such a firm will rapidly perish.

Type
Response Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 227 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baber, Harriet; 1994, “The Market For Feminist Epistemology,” The Monist, vol. 77, No. 4 (October), pp. 403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, John, and Judith, White; 1995, “Toward the Feminine Firm,” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 5, No. 3 (July), pp. 463–78.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol: 1982, In a Different Voice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. Thomas: 1986, “A Framework for Responsible Business Behavior,” Business and Society Review, vol. 58, Summer 1986, pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W.: 1976, “Theory of The Firm; Managerial Behavior, Ownership Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, pp. 305–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair: 1966, A Brief History of Ethics, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair: 1984, After Virtue, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair: 1988, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair: 1994, “A Partial Response to my Critics,” in Horton, John, and Susan, Mendus, ed. After Maclntyre: Critical Perspectives on The Work of Alasdair Maclntyre, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Craig: 1994, “The New Corporate Philanthropy,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 72, No. 3 (May-June), pp. 105–19.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C.; 1992, “Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics,” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 2, pp. 317–39.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C.: 1994, The New World of Business, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Inc.Google Scholar
Tavris, Carol; 1992, The Mismeasure of Women. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar