Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:38:42.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Environment, The Moralist, The Corporation and its Culture”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

George G. Brenkert
George G. Brenkert*
Affiliation:
The University of Tennessee/Knoxville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Contemporary society faces a wide range of environmental problems. In what ways might business be part of the solution, rather than the problem? The Moralist Model is one general response. It tends to focus on particular corporations which it treats as moral agents operating within our common moral system. As a consequence, it claims that, with various (usually modest) changes, corporations may become environmentally responsible.

This paper contends, on the contrary, that business has its own special “ethics,” which relates not simply to the internal nature of the corporation but also to the corporate (free market) system. Given this special ethics, business cannot in general be environmentally responsible in the manner that the Moralists demand. Instead, more far-reaching changes are needed within corporations and the economic system to promote environmental responsibility. Though the requisite changes are significant, there are forces pushing in the direction which the paper identifies.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1995 , pp. 675 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William P. (1967) “Emotion and Feeling,” in Edwards, Paul (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 2: 479–486.Google Scholar
Andrews, Kenneth R. (1989) “Ethics in Practice,” Harvard Business Review 89: 99–104.Google Scholar
Berenbein, Ronald E. (1988) “An Outbreak of Ethics,” Across the Board 25: 15–19.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Albert Z. (1968) “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?,” Harvard Business Review 46: 143–153.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Neil W. (1973) The Limits of Corporate Responsibility, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. Kirk (1990) “Straws in the Wind,” in Hoffman, W. Michael, Robert, Frederick and Edward, S. Petry Jr., Business, Ethics, and the Environment, 2 vols., New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas (1982) Corporations and Morality, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edwin M. (1987) “The Corporate Social Policy Process,” California Management Review 29: 99–114.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. (1978) “On Being Morally Considerable,” The Journal of Philosophy 75: 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. (1990) “Can a Corporation Have an Environmental Conscience?,” in Hoffman, W. Michael, Robert, Frederick and Edward, S. Petry Jr., Business, Ethics, and the Environment, 2 vols., New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett (1968) “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 62: 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Henderson, Hazel (1990) “From Environmentalism to Ecophilosophy: Retooling Cultures for the Twenty-first Century,” in Hoffman, W. Michael, Frederick, Robert and Petry, Edward S. Jr. (eds.), Business, Ethics, and the Environment, 2 vols., New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Hilgert, Raymond L. (1990) “What Ever Happened to Ethics in Business and Business Schools?,” in Richardson, John E. (ed.) Business Ethics 90/91, Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Hoffman, W. Michael (1991) “Business and Environmental Ethics,” Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 169–184.Google Scholar
Jackall, Robert (1983) “Moral Mazes: Bureaucracy and Managerial Work,” Harvard Business Review 61: 118–130.Google Scholar
Jackall, Robert (1988) Moral Mazes, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kleiner, Art (1991) “What Does It Mean to be Green?,” Harvard Business Review 69: 38–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Levitt, Theodore (1958) “The Dangers of Social Responsibility,” Harvard Business Review 36: 41–50.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. and Lewis, D. (1979) “Economic Approaches to Environmental Decision-Making,” Omega 7: 421–430.Google Scholar
Maccoby, Michael (1976) The Gamesman, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
McCoy, Bowen H. (1983) “The Parable of the Sadhu,” Harvard Business Review 83: 103–108.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair (1979) “Corporate Modernity and Moral Judgment: Are They Mutually Exclusive?,” in Kenneth, Goodpaster and Kenneth, Sayre (eds.), Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Madden, Carl (1977) “Forces Which Influence Ethical Behavior,” in Walton, Clarence (ed.) The Ethics of Corporate Conduct, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Magnet, Myron (1988) “The Decline & Fall of Business Ethics,” in Richardson, John E. (ed.) Business Ethics 90/91, Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, Henry (1983) “The Case for Corporate Social Responsibility,” The Journal of Business Strategy 4: 3–15.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick E. (1989) “Creating Ethical Corporate Structures,” Sloan Management Review 30: 81–87.Google Scholar
Naj, Amai (1991) “Foam Cups Damage Environment Less Than Paper Cups, Study Says,” Wall Street Journal 218, 23: B8.Google Scholar
Rienow, Robert (1978) “Business Corporations and Environmental Protection,” National Forum 58: 20–22.Google Scholar
Rolston III, Holmes (1984) “Just Environmental Business,” in Regan, Tom, ed., Just Business, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark (1981) “At the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima or Why Political Questions are Not All Economic,” Arizona Law Review 23: 1283–1298.Google Scholar
Singer, Ethan A. and Wooten, Leland M. (1976) “The Triumph and Failure of Albert Speer’s Administrative Genius,” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 12: 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Christopher (1975) Where The Law Ends, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Toffler, Barbara Ley (1991) “When the Signal is ‘Move It or Lose It,’” The New York Times 141 (November 17): F13.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Colin (1972) The Mountain People, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Waters, James A. (1978) “Catch 20.5: Corporate Morality as an Organizational Phenomenon,” Organizational Dynamics 6: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, E. S. (1989) “Remarks Presented at the World Resources Institute (Washington, D.C.)” Wilmington, DE: Printed by Du Pont.Google Scholar
Woolard, E. S. (1990) “Remarks Presented at the Detroit Economic Club (Detroit, MI)” Wilmington, Delaware: Printed by Du Pont.Google Scholar