Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:09:16.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Context on Trust in Firm-Stakeholder Relationships: The Institutional Environment, Trust Creation, and Firm Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Andrew C. Wicks  and
Shawn L. Berman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Recent work on the subject speaks to the importance trust has for firm performance (e.g., Hagen and Choe, 1999; Hill, 1995). Yet little work has been done to show how context affects the ability of firms to create trust in relationships with key stakeholders. This paper looks at how the institutional environment may affect the performance of different strategies for managing firm-stakeholder relationships, and in turn, how this affects firm performance. The authors put forward propositions that build on these theoretical insights and offer prospects for future empirical work.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 141 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. 1974. The limits of organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., and Hansen, M. H.. 1994. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 15: 175–190.Google Scholar
Brenkert, G. 1998. Trust, morality and international business. Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 293–317.Google Scholar
Das, T. K., and Teng, Bing-Sheng. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23: 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, F., and Solomon, R.. 1998. Creating trust. Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 205–232.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions within reason: The strategic role of emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 1988. Can we trust trust? In Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. Gambetta, D.. New York: Basil Blackwell: 213–237.Google Scholar
Gimeno, J., and Woo, C.. 1996. Hypercompetition in a multimarket environment: The role of strategic similarity and multimarket contact in competitive de-escalation. Organization Science 7: 322–431.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, J., and Choe, S.. 1999. Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of Management Review 23: 589–600.Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L. 1990. Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review 15: 500–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. W. L. 1995. National institutional structures, transaction cost economizing and competitive advantage: The case of Japan. Organization Science 6: 119–131.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. 1995. The Environmental Transformation of American Industry: An Institutional Account of Organizational Evolution in the Chemical and Petroleum Industries (1960–1993). Unpublished dissertation. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Hosmer, L. T. 1995. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review 20: 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, B. 1998. The ethical limits of trust in business relations. Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 233–248.Google Scholar
Jones, M. 1999. The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 20: 163–179.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review 20: 404–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. 1976. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-development approach. In Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues, ed. Lickona, T.. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 31–53.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In Networks in organizations: Structure, form, and action, ed. Nohria, N. and Eccles, R.. Boston: Harvard Business School Press: 216–239.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., and Bunker, B. B.. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, ed. Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage: 114–139.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D., and Bies, R.. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review 23: 438–458.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., and Weigert, A., A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63: 967–985.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D.. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20: 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38: 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., and Noordehaven, N.. 1997. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal 40: 308–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G.. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage : creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. 1987. Hybrid organizational arrangements: New form or transitional development? California Management Review (Fall): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, P. S., and Van de Ven, A. H. 1992. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal 13: 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Shane, S. 1994. The effect of national culture on the choice between licensing and direct foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal 15: 627–642.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1981. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Carroll, S., and Ashford, S.. 1995. Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal 38: 7–23.Google Scholar
Spender, J. C. 1989. Industry recipes. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, Inc.Google Scholar
Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., and Pinch, S.. 2000. Knowledge clusters and competitive advantage in global industries. Working paper.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. G. 1996. The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organization Science 7: 221–242.Google Scholar
Victor, B., and Blackburn, R.. 1987. Interdependence: An alternative conception. Academy of Management Review 12: 486–498.Google Scholar
Wicks, A., Berman, S., and Jones, T.. 1999. The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review 24: 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35–67.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8). New York, JAI Press: 53–111.Google Scholar