Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:24:28.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Director Stock Compensation: An Invitation to a Conspicuous Conflict of Interests?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Dan R. Dalton  and
Catherine M. Daily
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

While many aspects of stock and option based compensation for corporate officers remain controversial, we suggest that the growing trend for similar practices in favor of boards of directors will prove to be even more contentious. High-ranking corporate managers do not set their own salaries nor authorize their own stock options. By contrast, boards of directors do, in fact, set their own compensation packages. Other potential conflicts of interest include setting option performance targets, stock buybacks, stock option resets and reloads, consolidations (mergers and acquisitions), and service on multiple boards. As trust is the most valuable commodity in a capitalist society, we suggest that these potential conflicts of interest and related outcomes may ultimately serve to erode any anticipated benefits of director stock compensation.

Type
Corporate Governance
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 89 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acoba, M. A. 1999. “Insider Trading Jurisprudence after United States v. O’Hagan: A Restatement (Second) of Torts 551(2) Perspective.” Cornell Law Review 84: 1356–1417.Google Scholar
Allison, J. R. 1995. “A Process Value Analysis of Decision-Maker Bias: The Case of Economic Conflicts of Interest.” American Business Law Journal 32: 481–541.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M. 1993. “Independent Directors and the ALI Corporate Governance Project.” George Washington Law Review 61: 1034–1083.Google Scholar
Baliga, B. R.; Moyer, N. C; and Rao, R. S. 1996. “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What’s the Big Deal.” Strategic Management Journal 17: 41–53.Google Scholar
Bankowski, E. 1997. “Ethics Must Come from the Top Down.” Compensation and Benefits Review 29 (2): 25–26.Google Scholar
Berk, K. J.; Bertsch, K. A.; and Higgins, S. C. 1997. Board practices 1997: The structure and compensation of boards of directors at SandP Super 1500 companies. Washington, DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center.Google Scholar
Berk, K. J. and Tobey, S. R. 1996. Board practices 1996: The structure and compensation of boards of directors at SandP 500 companies. Washington, DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. K. 1995. “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model.” Strategic Management Journal 16: 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, V. 1997. “Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Law.” Boston College Law Review 38: 595–665.Google Scholar
Byrne, J. A. and Grover, R. 1997. “The Best and Worst Boards.” Business Week (12/08/97) 3556: 90–99.Google Scholar
Carey, D. C; Elson, C. M.; and England, J. D. 1996. “How Should Corporate Directors Be Compensated?” Directors and Boards 26: 1–12.Google Scholar
Carr, L. and Valinezhad, M. 1994. “The Role of Ethics in Executive Compensation: Toward a Contractarian Interpretation of the Neoclassical Theory of Managerial Remuneration.” Journal of Business Ethics 13: 81–93.Google Scholar
Carson, T. L. 1994. “Conflict of Interests.” Journal of Business Ethics 13: 387–405.Google Scholar
Child, J. W. and Marcoux, A. M. 1999. “Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder Theory in the Original Position.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 207–223.Google Scholar
Cinar, E. M. 1999. “The Issue of Insider Trading in Law and Economics: Lessons for Emerging Markets in the World.” Journal of Business Ethics 19: 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Corporate Performance.” Academy of Academy Review 20: 92–117.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 1999. “The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications.” Northwestern University Law Review 93: 641–707.Google Scholar
Colvin, G. 1999a. “Bad Boards, Bad Boards—Whatcha Gonna Do?” Fortune (4/26/99) 139 (8): 411–417.Google Scholar
Colvin, G. 1999b. “It’s a Banner Year for CEO Pay.” Fortune (4/26/99) 139 (8): 422–424.Google Scholar
The Conference Board. 1990. Corporate Directors’ Compensation 1990 Edition. Research Report no. 936.Google Scholar
Cook, F. W. 1997. “Compensation Ethics: Guidelines for Developing a Code.” Compensation and Benefits Review 29 (2): 24–29.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. 1998. “More Companies Are Linking Directors’ Pay to Performance. But Is It a No-Lose Deal?” Wall Street Journal, April 9, p. R6. (Quote attributed to Ira Kay.)Google Scholar
Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1992. “Officer and Director Stock Ownership and Firm Performance in the Publicly Traded Small Corporation.” Journal of Business Strategies 9 (2): 101–113.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1994. “Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure.” Academy of Management Journal 37: 1603–1617.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1999. “On the Measurement of Board Composition: If You Have Seen One, You Certainly Have Not Seen Them All.” Decision Sciences 30: 83–106.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M.; Johnson, J. L.; Ellstrand, A. E.; and Dalton, D. R. 1998. “Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of CEO Compensation.” Academy of Management Journal 41: 209–220.Google Scholar
Dallas, L. L. 1997. “Proposals for Reform of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Dual Board and Board Ombudspersons.” Washington and Lee Law Review 54: 91–147.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. R.; Daily, C. M.; Ellstrand, A. E.; and Johnson, J. L. 1998. “Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance: Meta-Analytic Reviews and Research Agenda.” Strategic Management Journal 19: 269–290.Google Scholar
David, P.; Kochhar, R.; and Levitas, E. 1998. “The Effects of Institutional Investors on the Level and Mix of CEO Compensation.” Academy of Management Journal 41: 200–208.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1992. “Codes of Ethics, Professions, and Conflict of Interest.” Professional Ethics 1 (1 and 2): 179–195.Google Scholar
Davis, J. F.; Schoorman, F. G.; and Donaldson, L. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22: 20–47.Google Scholar
Dilworth, J. B. 1994. “The Ethical Importance of Conflicts of Interest.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 13(1 and 2): 25–40.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. 1994. “Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory.” Academy of Management Review 19: 252–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.” Academy of Management Review 14: 57–74.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. D. 1998. “Equity Derivatives, Executive Compensation, and Agency Costs.” Houston Law Review 35: 399–451.Google Scholar
Elson, C. M. 1995. “The Duty of Care, Compensation, and Stock Ownership.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 63: 649–711.Google Scholar
Elson, C. M. 1996. “Director Compensation and the Management-Captured Board—The History of a Symptom and a Cure.” Southern Methodist Law Review 50: 127–174.Google Scholar
Fama, E. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 975–990.Google Scholar
Fisch, J. E. 1997. “Corporate Governance: Taking Boards Seriously.” Cardozo Law Review 19: 265–290.Google Scholar
Fort, T. L. 1998. “Goldilocks and Business Ethics: A Paradigm That Fits ‘Just Right.’ The Journal of Corporation Law 23: 245–276.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., and Evan, W. M. 1990. “Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 337–359.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1994. “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 409–421.Google Scholar
Gogoi, P. 1999. “False Impressions: More Companies Require Top Executives to Own Stock. The Result Is Not What Everybody Expected.” Wall Street Journal, April 8, R3.Google Scholar
Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1994. “Executive compensation: A reassessment and a future research agenda.” In Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management vol. 12, ed. Ferris, G. R., pp. 161–222. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Gomez-Mejia, L. R. and Wiseman, R. M. 1997. “Refraining Executive Compensation: An Assessment and Outlook.” Journal of Management 23: 291–374.Google Scholar
Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. 1999. “Conflict of Interest in the Issuance of Public Securities: Evidence from Venture Capital.” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Grossman, W. and Hoskisson, R. E. 1998. “CEO Pay at the Crossroads of Wall Street and Main: Toward Strategic Design of Executive Compensation.” Academy of Management Executive 12 (1): 43–57.Google Scholar
Hamermesh, L. A. 1996. “Calling Off the Lynch Mob: The Corporate Director’s Fiduciary Disclosure Duty.” Vanderbilt Law Review 49: 1087–1178.Google Scholar
Hardy, E. S. and DeCarlo, S. 1999. “Compensation Fit for a King.” Forbes (5/17/99), 163(10): 202–204.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S. and Fiet, J. O. 1999. “New CEOs Pursue their Own Self-Interest by Sacrificing Stakeholder Value.” Journal of Business Ethics 19: 301–308.Google Scholar
IRRC Corporate Governance Bulletin. 1997. CalPERS publishes U.S. governance principles. May-June: 20–23.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. A. 1996. “Interested Director Transactions and the (Equivocal) Effects of Shareholder Ratification.” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 21: 91–1025.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. A.; Hoskisson, R. E.; and Hitt, M. A. 1993. “Board of Director Restructuring: The Effects of Board Versus Managerial Controls and Characteristics.” Strategic Management Journal 14: 33–50.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. S. 1995. “Pay for Performance: Corporate Executive Compensation in the 1990s.” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 20: 183–224.Google Scholar
Kaback, H. 1996. “The Case for Cash for Directors.” Directors and Boards 20 (2): 14–24.Google Scholar
Kaback, H. 1996. “A Reply from the Author.” Directors and Boards 20 (3): 41–42.Google Scholar
Kitch, E. W. 1995. “The Theory and Practice of Securities Disclosure.” Brooklyn Law Review 61: 763–826.Google Scholar
Klein, A. 1998. “Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure.” Journal of Law and Economics 41: 275–301.Google Scholar
Klein, S. 1995. “An Aristotelian Approach to Ethical Corporate Leadership.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 14 (3): 1–23.Google Scholar
Kosnik, R. D. 1990. “Effects of Board Demography and Directors’ Incentives on Corporate Greenmail Decisions.” Academy of Management Journal 33: 129–150.Google Scholar
Kurland, N. B. 1995. “Ethics, Incentives, and Conflicts of Interest.” Journal of Business Ethics 14: 465–477.Google Scholar
Kurland, N. B. 1999. “Ethics and Commission.” Business and Society Review 104: 29–33.Google Scholar
Lampe, J. C. 1995. “A Stakeholder Approach to Accountants’ Ethical Conduct in Conflicts of Interest.” Professional Ethics 4 (2): 25–48.Google Scholar
Langevoort, D. C. 1998. “Stakeholder Values, Disclosure, and Materiality.” Catholic University Law Review 48: 93–100.Google Scholar
Langevoort, D. C. 1999. “Rereading Cady, Roberts: The Ideology and Practice of Insider Trading Regulation.” Columbia Law Review 99: 1319–1344.Google Scholar
Lin, L. 1996. “The Effectiveness of Outside Directors as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Theories and Evidence.” Northwestern University Law Review 90: 898–967.Google Scholar
Lorsch, J. W., and Maclver, E. 1989. Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, M. J. 1994. “The SEC and the Future of Corporate Governance.” Alabama Law Review 45: 783–815.Google Scholar
Lublin, J. S. 1998. “Lowering the Bar.” Wall Street Journal, April 8, Rl.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1999. Compensation. Chief Executive 146: 45–50.Google Scholar
Ma, Y., and Sun, H. L. 1998. “Where Should the Line Be Drawn on Insider Trading Ethics?” Journal of Business Ethics 17: 67–76.Google Scholar
Mahoney, P. G. 1995. “Mandatory Disclosure as a Solution to Agency Problems.” University of Chicago Law Review 62: 1047–1111.Google Scholar
Marcus, A. D. 1999. “Tyco Directors to Get More Than 90 percent of Cash Compensation in Stock, Options.” Wall Street Journal, November 4, A6.Google Scholar
Maremont, M., and Nelson, E. 1998. “Cendant Officials Reap Big Paper Gains on Options’ Repricing and Stock’s Climb.” Wall Street Journal, November 23, B7.Google Scholar
Marens, R., and Wicks, A. 1999. “Getting Real: Shareholder Theory, Managerial Practice, and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to Shareholders.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2): 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, L. B. 1999. “Executive Compensation and the Misplaced Emphasis on Increasing Shareholder Access to the Proxy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 147: 1205–1249.Google Scholar
Martinez, B. 1998. “Meridian Officials Bulk Up As They Head Out.” Wall Street Journal, December 23, B8.Google Scholar
McCarthy, E. 1999. “Stock Buybacks.” Journal of Accountancy 187 (5): 91–96.Google Scholar
Meltzer, M., and Ash, R. P. 1998. “Compensating the Entrepreneurial Board: A Holistic Approach.” Compensation and Benefits Review 30 (4): 49–57.Google Scholar
Meyer, P. 1998. “Board Stock Ownership: More, and More Again.” Directors and Boards 22(2): 55–60.Google Scholar
Millstein, I. M. and MacAvoy, P. 1998. “The Active Board of Directors and Performance of the Large Publicly Traded Corporation.” Columbia Law Review 98: 1283–1321.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S. 1992. The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relationships and Their Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenson, G. 1998. “Stock Options Are Not a Free Lunch.” Forbes (5/18/99), 161 (10): 212–218.Google Scholar
Oesterle, D. A. 1998. “The Inexorable March Toward a Continuous Disclosure Requirement for Publicly Traded Firms: ‘Are We There Yet?’” Cardozo Law Review 20: 135–224.Google Scholar
Palmiter, A. R. 1989. “Reshaping the Corporate Fiduciary Model: A Director’s Duty of Independence.” Texas Law Review 67: 1351–1417.Google Scholar
Ponemon, L. A. 1995. “The Objectivity of Accountants’ Litigation Support Judgements.” Accounting Review 70: 467–489.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. and Jones, T. 1995. “An Agent Morality View of Business Policy.” Academy of Management Review 20: 22–42.Google Scholar
Reda, J. 1999. “Breathing Underwater: Amid Shareholder Complaints, Companies Look for Alternatives to Repricing Options.” Wall Street Journal, April 8, R6.Google Scholar
Reed, D. 1999. “Stakeholder Management Theory: A Critical Theory Perspective.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 453–483.Google Scholar
Reingold, J. and Grover, R. 1999. “Executive Pay.” Business Week (4/19/99), 3625: 721–78.Google Scholar
Reingold, J., and Spiro, L. N. 1998. “Nice Option If You Can Get It.” Business Week, May 4, 111.Google Scholar
Rock, E. B. 1991. “The Logic and (Uncertain) Significance of Institutional Shareholder Activism. ”Georgetown Law Journal 79 (3): 445–506.Google Scholar
Rose, F. 1997. “Times Mirror Joins Companies that Pay Outside Directors by Stock Performance.” The Wall Street Journal, March 31, B8.Google Scholar
Rose, N. F. and Shepard, A. 1997. “Firm Diversification and CEO Compensation: Managerial Ability Or Executive Entrenchment?” Rand Journal of Economics 28: 489–514.Google Scholar
Schellhardt, T. D. 1999. “More Directors Are Raking in Six-Figure Pay.” Wall Street Journal, October 29, Bl.Google Scholar
Shankman, N. A. 1999. “Refraining the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm.” Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4): 319–334.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. 1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” The Journal of Finance 52: 737–782.Google Scholar
Settle, J, and Kurland, N. B. 1998. “Can We Create a Conflict-Free Commission Payment System?” Business and Society Review 100: 33–44.Google Scholar
Stein, B. J. 1997. “Back to Ethical Basics.” Chief Executive 126: 72–73.Google Scholar
Swanson, C.B. 1996. “Corporate Governance: Sliding Seamlessly into The Twenty-First Century.” The Journal of Corporate Law 21: 417–455.Google Scholar
Wachel, W. 1993. “When in Doubt, Deal Yourself Out.” Trustee, December, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. H., and Wagner, C. G. 1997. “Recent Developments in Executive, Director, and Employee Stock Compensation Plans: New Concerns for Corporate Directors.” Stanford Journal of Law, Business, and Finance 3: 5–27.Google Scholar
Walters, B.; Hardin, T; and Schick, J. 1995. “Top Executive Compensation: Equity Or Excess? Implications for Regaining American Competitiveness.” Journal of Business Ethics 14: 227–234.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. and Zajac, E. J. 1997. “Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity, and the Diffusion of Board Independence in U.S. Corporations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 161–183.Google Scholar
Worrell, K. 1997. Corporate Directors’ Compensation in 1997. Chief Executive Digest. 1 (4): 27–28.Google Scholar
Zaleznik, A.; Stobaugh, R.; Elson, C. M.; Marley, J. E.; Franklin, B. H.; Kopes, R. H.; Levy, L.; Salwen, R.; and Kaback, H. 1996. “A Sprinted Debate over Director Pay.” Directors and Boards 20 (3): 30–42.Google Scholar