Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:31:29.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Approaches and Assumptions: Comments on Manuel Velasquez

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract

I feel that Professor Velasquez has written a very interesting and thought-provoking paper on an important topic. His initial identification with a “strong notion of the common good” (p. 1) raises the level of analysis to a high but very complex plane. The author introduces the interesting and, from my view, unusual realist objection in the Hobbsian form. After a rigorous analysis of this concept Professor Velasquez reaches what I find to be a disturbing conclusion: “It is not obvious that we can say that multinationals have an obligation to contribute to the global common good…” (p. 6). He then finishes t he paper with a strong plea for the establishment of “an international authority capable of forcing everyone to contribute toward the global good” (p. 6).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 “Corporate Ethics: A Prime Business Asset.” A Report of The Business Roundtable, 200 Park Avenue, Suite 2222, New York, NY 10166, 1988.

2 Ibid., p. 56.

3 “Polaroid—Kodak, B.” Harvard Business School Cases 378-173 through 378-182, 1978.