Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Williams, Scott David
and
Dewett, Todd
2005.
Yes, You Can Teach Business Ethics: A Review and Research Agenda.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
109.
Rocha, Hector O.
and
Ghoshal, Sumantra
2006.
Beyond Self‐Interest Revisited*.
Journal of Management Studies,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
585.
Caldwell, Cam
Karri, Ranjan
and
Vollmar, Pamela
2006.
Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the Follower’s Perspective.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
207.
James, Harvey S.
2006.
Sustainable agriculture and free market economics: Finding common ground in Adam Smith.
Agriculture and Human Values,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
427.
Cosans, Christopher
2009.
Does Milton Friedman Support a Vigorous Business Ethics?.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 3,
p.
391.
Mayer, Don
2011.
Legal Loopholes, Business Ethics, and Corporate Legal Strategy: A Reply to Professor Ostas.
American Business Law Journal,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 4,
p.
713.
Chappell, Michael Jahi
and
LaValle, Liliana A.
2011.
Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis.
Agriculture and Human Values,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Beets, S. Douglas
2011.
Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 2,
p.
193.
Gotsis, George
and
Kortezi, Zoe
2011.
Bounded self‐interest: a basis for constructive organizational politics.
Management Research Review,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
450.
Fok, Eric K. H.
2012.
The Common Good as the Basis of Business Morality.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
James, Harvey S.
2013.
The Ethics and Economics of Agrifood Competition.
Vol. 20,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
James, Harvey S.
2013.
Jayson Lusk: The food police: a well-fed manifesto about the politics of your plate.
Agriculture and Human Values,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
661.
Ferrero, Ignacio
Michael Hoffman, W.
and
McNulty, Robert E.
2014.
Must Milton Friedman Embrace Stakeholder Theory?.
Business and Society Review,
Vol. 119,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Proctor, Tony
2014.
Reflections on aspects of executive behaviour in the early railway companies in Britain.
Journal of Management History,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
352.
Ferrero, Ignacio
2014.
La Responsabilidad Social Y El Papel De Los Directivos. Una Puesta Al DDa En Las Ideas De Friedman (Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of Managers. An Update on Friedmanns Ideas).
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Ferrero, Ignacio
2015.
Responsabilidad Social Y Responsabilidad Limitada En Milton Friedman. De Un Modelo Shareholder Hacia Un Modelo Stakeholder (Social and Limited Responsibility in Milton Friedman. From a Shareholder to a Stakeholder Model).
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Overall, Jeffrey
2016.
Unethical behavior in organizations: empirical findings that challenge CSR and egoism theory.
Business Ethics: A European Review,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
113.
Hühn, Matthias P.
and
Dierksmeier, Claus
2016.
Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 136,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Jahn, Johannes
and
Brühl, Rolf
2018.
How Friedman’s View on Individual Freedom Relates to Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 153,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Moroni, Stefano
2018.
Individual motivations, emergent complexity and the just city: Is egoism one of the main problems of contemporary social-spatial realities, and altruism the principal antidote?.
Cities,
Vol. 75,
Issue. ,
p.
81.