Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:01:55.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Moses L. Pava
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Wayne Norman and Chris MacDonald launch a strong attack against Triple Bottom Line or 3BL accounting in their article “Getting to the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’” (2004). This response suggests that, while limitations to 3BL accounting do exist, the critique of Norman and MacDonald is deeply flawed.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 105 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Business Ethics Quarterly 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown and Williamson, Tobacco USA. 2003. Social and Environmental Report 2002/2003. Winston-Salem, N.C.: R. J. Reynolds Co.Google Scholar
Bullen, Hasley G., and Kimberly, Crook. 2005. “Revisiting the Concepts” (May), www.fasb.org.Google Scholar
Norman, Wayne, and Chris, MacDonald. 2004. “Getting to the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line,’” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2) (April): 243–62.Google Scholar