Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-29T22:20:13.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction An Ethic for Corporate Governance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

Corporate governance is a complex and contested issue, and its ambiguities become even more problematic when ethical considerations are taken into account. This introduction attempts to address these complexities, to illuminate their ethical aspects, and to situate the eight papers presented here within what we believe to be an integrative heuristic framework.

The dominant theoretical perspective on governance relationships and their associated problems is to be found within economics, and in particular within agency theory. With the separation of ownership from control (Berle and Means 1932) a potential problem arises in the context of what is now constituted as a relationship between the owners (principals) and directors (their agents). How can the principals ensure that the agents are serving the owners’ interests rather than their own? Against the backdrop of the assumption of an essentially self-seeking, opportunistic human nature only market discipline, monitoring, and incentives can be used to align agent behavior with the interests of the distant and/or absent shareholder understood as the owner.

In recent years there has developed a perspective that runs counter to this theorization of the key governance relationship and its problem. The elaboration of so-called stakeholder views of the corporation (Freeman 1993, Blair 1995) argues both empirically and normatively that there is a wider range of relevant relationships, and thus a greater number of interests at stake in the governance of the corporation. It is not only shareholders who have made firm-specific investments in the organization, but also employees, suppliers, and customers, and their interests must therefore also be taken account of in the constitution and conduct of corporate governance. Associated with this view is a very different conception of the director as steward (Davis et al. 1997) or trustee of the corporation (Kay 1996), where the corporation is conceived, not as a set of ownership rights accruing to those who assume the residual risk of a business, but as a social institution. From this perspective the duties of directors lie in aligning and balancing a wide variety of potentially competitive interests within the corporation.

Type
Corporate Governance
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blair, M. 1995. Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the twenty-first Century. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Davis, J.; Schoorman, R; and Donaldson, L. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22: 2047.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. 1992. Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1993. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation.” In Ethical Theory and Business, ed. Beauchamp, T. and Bowie, N., pp. 7593. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1998. False Dawn: the Delusions of Global Capitalism. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Hasnas, J. 1998. “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: a Guide for the Perplexed.” Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 1942.Google Scholar
Kay, J. 1996. The Business of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korten, D. 1995. When Corporations Rule the World. Connecticut: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Soros, G. 1998. The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered. London: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar