Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:50:37.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuing the Social Contract Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Michael Keeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Social contract theory has a rich history. It originated among the ancients with recognition that social arrangements were not products of nature but convention. It developed through the centuries as theorists sought ethical criteria for distinguishing good conventions from bad. The search for such ethical criteria continues in recent attempts to apply social contract theory to organizations. In this paper, I question the concept of consent as a viable ethical criterion, and I argue for an alternate principle of impartiality as a more appropriate moral norm in a social contract theory of organizations.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 241 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, F. G., The Kingdom of Individuals. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest, Greek Political Theory, 5th ed. London: Methuen, 1960.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Dunfee, Thomas W., “Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Communitarian Conception of Economic Ethics.” Economics and Philosophy, 1993 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Gough, J. W., The Social Contract, 2d ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Keeley, Michael, A Social-Contract Theory of Organizations. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Keeley, Michael, “The Trouble with Transformational Leadership: Toward a Federalist Ethic for Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 1995. 5, 1: 67–96.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, “The Social Contract Tradition.” In Peter, Singer (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics: 186–196. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., International Law and Human Rights. New York: Praeger, 1950.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N., “What Price Contract? — An Essay in Perspective.” Yale Law Journal, 1931, 40: 704–751.Google Scholar
Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Peter, Laslett, 2d ed. London, Cambridge University Press, 1967. (Original, 1690)Google Scholar
Machrone, Bill, “Honest Abe and the 486.” PC Magazine, 1992 (August): 87.Google Scholar
Nider, Johannes, On the Contracts of Merchants. Translated by Reeves, Charles H.. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1966. (Original, 1468)Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller, “Feminism, the Individual, and Contract Theory.” Ethics, 1990, 100: 658–669.Google Scholar
Phillips, Derek L., Looking Backward. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rakoff, Todd D., “Contracts of Adhesion: An Essay in Reconstruction.” Harvard Law Review, 1983, 96: 1173–1284.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Romilly, Jacqueline de, The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Translated by Janet, Lloyd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter, The Individual and Society in the Middle Ages. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan, Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar