Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:14:27.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Codes of Conduct in Global Supply Chains Really Voluntary? From Soft Law Regulation of Labour Relations to Consumer Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

André Sobczak
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Labour and employment law no longer has a monopoly on regulating labour relations and is facing a crisis as its effectiveness is questioned. Codes of conduct adopted by companies to recognise their social responsibility for the global supply chain are instruments that can usefully complement labour and employment law. The aim of this paper is to analyse in depth the legal nature of codes of conduct and their impact on labour and employment law. Will the use of codes of conduct reinforce the crisis of labour and employment law in the era of globalisation or will these codes be part of a solution to this crisis? Do we have to consider codes of conduct as competitors to labour and employment law or as an opportunity for rethinking the way that labour and employment law norms should be produced and applied?

Type
Special Forum
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 167 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Denis G., and Laura, P. Hartman 2003. “Moral Imagination and the Future of Sweatshops,” Business and Society Review 108(4): 425–61.Google Scholar
Arthurs, Harry. 2002. “Private Ordering and Workers’ Rights in the Global Economy: Corporate Codes of Conduct as a Regime of Labour Market Regulation,” in Conaghan, Fischl, and Klare, 2002: 471–87.Google Scholar
Atleson, James. 2002. “The Voyage of the Neptune Jade: Transnational Labour Solidarity and the Obstacles of Domestic Law,” in Conaghan, Fischl, and Klare, 2002: 379–99.Google Scholar
Beauchard, Jean. 1996. Droit de la distribution et de la consommation. Paris: PuF.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Paul. 2002. “Who Needs Labour Law?” in Conaghan, Fischl, and Klare, 2002: 75–92.Google Scholar
Boissonnat, Jean, ed. 1995. Le travail dans vingt ans. Rapport du Commissariat général du Plan. Paris: Odile Jacob/ La Documentation française.Google Scholar
Calais-Auloy, Jean, and Franck, Steinmetz. 2000. Droit de la consommation, 5th ed. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Carroll, Archie B. 1999. “Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construction,” Business & Society 38(3): 268–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Joanne, Richard, Michael Fischl, and Karl, Klare, eds. 2002. Labour Law in the Era of Globalization: Transformative Practices & Possibilities. Oxford: Oxford university Press.Google Scholar
Daugareilh, Isabelle. 1998. “Quelques observations sur des expériences de négociation collective internationale,” Syndicalisme et société 1: 51.Google Scholar
Del, Cont Catherine. 1997. Propriété économique, dépendance et responsabilité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Diller, Janelle. 1999. “A Social Conscience in the Global Marketplace? Labour Dimensions of Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Investor Initiatives.” International Labour Review 138(2): 99–129.Google Scholar
Dockès, Emmanuel. 1994. “L’engagement unilatéral de l’employeur,” Droit Social 1994(3): 227–36.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1999. Codes of Conduct and Social Labels. Ethical Consumption and Production. Special Edition of European Social Dialog. Luxembourg: EUR-OP.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development. COM(2002) 347 final. Brussels, 2 July 2002.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2003. Mapping Instrumentsfor Corporate Social Responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publication of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R.B. 1988. “The Legal Status of Non-Statutary Codes of Conduct,” Journal of Business Law 12: 12–19.Google Scholar
Ferrier, Didier. 1996. La protection des consommateurs. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman/Ballinger.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, Dara, O’Rourke, and Charles, Sabel. 2001. “Stepping Up Labor Standards,” Boston Review 26(1): 4–20.Google Scholar
Hepple, Bob. 2002. “Enforcement: The Law and Politics of Cooperation and Compliance,” in Bob, Hepple, Social and Labour Rights in a Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 238.Google Scholar
International Labour Office. 1997. The ILO, Standard Setting and Globalisation. Report of the Director-General. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
International Labour Office. 1998. Overview of Global Developments and Office Activities concerning Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Other Private Sector Initiatives Addressing Labour Issues. Working Party on the Social Dimension of the Liberalization of International Trade. GB.273/WP/SDL/1.Google Scholar
Izorche, Marie-Laur. 2000. L’avènement de l’engagement unilatéral en droit privé contemporain. Marseille: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl. 2002. “The Horizons of Transformative Labour and Employment Law,” in Conaghan, Fischl, and Klare, 2002: 3–29.Google Scholar
Kolk, Ans, and Rob, Van Tulder. 2002. “Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business and Stakeholder Codes,” Journal of Business Ethics 36(3): 291–306.Google Scholar
Lyon-Caen, Antoine. 1977. “La grève en droit international privé,” Revue Critique de Droit International Privé 1977: 271–99.Google Scholar
Macklem, Patrick. 2001. Labour Law Beyond Borders. University of Toronto. Faculty of Law. Research Paper No. 02–02.Google Scholar
Monte, Marc J. 2001. “Corporate Factory/Supplier Monitoring Programs and the Failure of International Law in Regulating Indian Factory Conditions,” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 26(3): 1125–46.Google Scholar
Mückenberger, Ulrich. 2002. “Vers une configuration multilatérale du droit du travail?” Semaine sociale Lamy, 1095 (28 octobre): 26–28.Google Scholar
New Economics Foundation. 1998. Social Labels: Tools for Ethical Trade. Report for the European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs. London: NEF.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 1999. Codes of Corporate Conduct: An Inventory. Working Party for the Trade Community. TD/TC/WP (98) 74/final. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2001. Codes of Corporate Conduct: Expanded Review of their Contents. Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2001/6. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Philips, Robert, Edward Freeman, R., and Andrew, C. Wicks. 2003. “What Stakeholder Theory is Not,” Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4): 479–502.Google Scholar
Rigaud, Barbara. 2001. “SCIC: vers la création d’une société à vocation sociale?” Juris-Associations, 244: 5–6.Google Scholar
Sobczak, André. 2002. Réseaux de sociétés et codes de conduite: un nouveau modèle de régulation des relations de travail pour les entreprises européennes. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Sobczak, André.. 2003a. “Codes of Conduct in Subcontracting Networks: A Labour Law Perspective,” Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3): 225–34.Google Scholar
Sobczak, André.. 2003b. “Legal Framework of CSR,” in Jean-Pierre, Segal, André, Sobczak, and Claude-Emmanuel, Triomphe, Corporate Social Responsibility and Working Conditions. Report to the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Dublin, 22–26.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain. 1992. “La réglementation patronale de l’entreprise,” Droit Social 1992(3): 215–26.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain. 2001a. Beyond Employment: Changes in Work and the Future of Labour Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain. 2001b. “Revisiter les droits d’action collective,” Droit Social 2001(7–8): 687–704.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1987. Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor. 1996. The Apparel Industry and Codes of Conduct: A Solution to the International Child Labor Problem? Washington: Bureau of International Labor Affairs.Google Scholar
Vos, Janita. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Identification of Stakeholders. University of Groningen. Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).Google Scholar