Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:43:00.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Do Corporations Engage in LGBT Rights Activism? LGBT Employee Groups as Internal Pressure Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

Cory Maks-Solomon Open the ORCID record for Cory Maks-Solomon [Opens in a new window]  and
Josiah Mark Drewry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most scholarship on corporate political activity assumes that market forces wholly motivate firms’ political strategies. However, this conventional wisdom overlooks the role of employee groups in encouraging corporate activism. To evaluate whether employee groups are associated with firm social activism, we gathered all public statements in support of LGBT rights made by the five hundred largest publicly-traded US corporations from 2011 to 2017. In an exploratory observational analysis, we found robust evidence that in highly-educated workforces LGBT employee groups persuade management to take public stances in support of LGBT rights. Our findings suggest that internal pressure promotes activism on LGBT issues, and market, political, or social forces are insufficient to fully explain firm social activism. Although each does play an important role, since employee groups will use political, social, and especially market-based arguments to convince their managers to engage in activism.

Keywords

corporate political activitycorporate activismLGBT issuesworkplace diversityemployee resource groupsstakeholder management
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 124 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of V.K. Aggarwal

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This research was previously presented at the George Washington University Political Science Department's American Politics Workshop, the American Political Science Association's 2018 annual meeting, the National Capital Area Political Science Association's American Politics Workshop, and the Academy of Management's 2019 annual meeting. We are grateful to attendees of each event and to several anonymous reviewers for their feedback. We would especially like to thank Sarah Binder, Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, John Sides, and Jorge E. Rivera for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

Althaus, Scott L. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” The American Political Science Review 92 (3): 545–58. doi:10.2307/2585480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artavia, David, and Anderson-Minshall, Jacob. 2017. “10 Companies Leading the Way on Global LGBTI Rights.” Advocate. Accessed on 20 October 2019. https://www.advocate.com/current-issue/2017/11/06/10-companies-leading-way-global-lgbti-rights.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2017. “North Carolina's ‘bathroom bill’ repeal: Who's satisfied?” NBC News. Accessed on 29 January 2019. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/north-carolina-s-bathroom-bill-repeal-who-s-satisfied-n741056.Google Scholar
Badgett, M. V. Lee, Durso, Laura E., Mallory, Christy, and Kastanis, Angeliki. 2013. “The Business Impact of LGBT-Supportive Workplace Policies.” UCLA School of Law: The Williams Insitute. Accessed 12 September 2018. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vt6t9zx.Google Scholar
Bajko, Matthew S. 2019. “Business Briefs: LGBT employee groups expand scope.” Bay Area Reporter. Accessed 20 October 2019. https://www.ebar.com/news/news//281688.Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, Pazit, and Levitan, Lindsey Clark. 2011. “We're Closer than I Thought: Social Network Heterogeneity, Morality, and Political Persuasion: Social Network Heterogeneity, Morality, and Persuasion.” Political Psychology 32 (4): 643–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00826.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bode, Christiane, Singh, Jasjit, and Rogan, Michelle. 2015. “Corporate Social Initiatives and Employee Retention.” Organization Science 26 (6): 1702–20. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2016a. “Avenues of influence: on the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives.” Business and Politics 18 (4): 367–94. doi:10.1515/bap-2016-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2016b. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 2.0 [Computer file]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime.Google Scholar
Briscoe, Forrest, and Gupta, Abhinav. 2016. “Social Activism in and Around Organizations.” The Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 671–727. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1153261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, Forrest, and Safford, Sean. 2008. “The Nixon-in-China Effect: Activism, Imitation, and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practices.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (3): 460–91. doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, Forrest, and Safford, Sean. 2010. “Employee Affinity Groups: Their Evolution from Social Movements Vehicle to Employer Strategies.” Perspectives on Work 14 (1/2): 42–5.Google Scholar
Burbano, Vanessa C. 2016. “Social Responsibility Messages and Worker Wage Requirements: Field Experimental Evidence from Online Labor Marketplaces.” Organization Science 27 (4): 1010–28. doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadei, Emily. 2015. “How Corporate America Propelled Same-Sex Marriage.” Newsweek. Accessed 9 September 2018. https://www.newsweek.com/2015/07/10/shift-corporate-america-social-issues-become-good-business-348458.html.Google Scholar
Carnahan, Seth, Kryscynski, David, and Olson, Daniel. 2017. “When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Employee Turnover? Evidence from Attorneys Before and After 9/11.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (5): 1932–62. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterji, Aaron K., and Toffel, Michael W.. 2019. “Assessing the Impact of CEO Activism.” Organization & Environment 32 (2): 159–85. doi:10.1177/1086026619848144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Tony, LoBianco, Tom, and Stanglin, Doug. 2015. “Indiana governor signs amended ’religious freedom’ law.” USA TODAY. Accessed 29 January 2019. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/04/02/indiana-religious-freedom-law-deal-gay-discrimination/70819106/.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60. doi:10.2307/2095101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Priscilla H. 2008. “Affinity Groups: Catalyst for Inclusive Organizations.” Employment Relations Today 34 (4): 11–18. doi:10.1002/ert.20171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endres, Kyle, and Panagopoulos, Costas. 2017. “Boycotts, buycotts, and political consumerism in America.” Research & Politics 4 (4): 1–9. doi:10.1177/2053168017738632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flammer, Caroline, and Luo, Jiao. 2017. “Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment.” Strategic Management Journal 38 (2): 163–83. doi:10.1002/smj.2492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, Sarah, King, Miriam, Rodgers, Renae, Ruggles, Steven, and Robert Warren, J.. 2018. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 6.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. Accessed 1 September 2018. https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V65.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
Getz, Kathleen A. 1997. “Research in Corporate Political Action: Integration and Assessment.” Business & Society 36 (1): 32–72. doi:10.1177/000765039703600103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., Lee, Frances E., and Parrott, Michael. 2014. “Business Interests and the Party Coalitions: Industry Sector Contributions to U.S. Congressional Campaigns.” American Politics Research 42 (6): 1034–76. doi:10.1177/1532673X14525832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Githens, Rod P., and Aragon, Steven R.. 2009. “LGBT Employee Groups: Goals and Organizational Structures.” Advances in Developing Human Resources 11 (1): 121–35. doi:10.1177/1523422308329200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Marc. 2006. “Queer Inc.” Forbes. Accessed 20 October 2019. https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/12/11/8395465/index.htm.Google Scholar
Harrigan, Nicholas M. 2017. “Motives of Corporate Political Donations: Industry Regulation, Subjective Judgement and the Origins of Pragmatic and Ideological Corporations.” The British Journal of Sociology: 1–36. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12270.Google Scholar
Hart, David M. 2004. “‘Business’ Is Not an Interest Group: On the Study of Companies in American National Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1): 47–69. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.090803.161829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2018. Politics at Work: How Companies Turn Their Workers into Lobbyists (Studies in Postwar American Political Development). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J., and Hitt, Michael A.. 1999. “Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 825–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, Amy J., and Keim, Gerald D.. 2001. “Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line?” Strategic Management Journal 22 (2): 125–39.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelstein, Jerome L., and McRae, James A. Jr. 1988. “Social Issues and Socioeconomic Status.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52 (4): 492. doi:10.1086/269126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffington Post. 2012. “Chick-Fil-A Responds To Anti-Gay Controversy On Facebook.” The Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/19/chick-fil-a-anti-gay-controversy-responds_n_1686682.html.Google Scholar
Hurley, Lawrence. 2015. “How Wall Street came out on gay marriage.” Reuters. Accessed 20 October 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-gaymarriage-wallstreet-insi/how-wall-street-came-out-on-gay-marriage-idUSKBN0NE0C820150423.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1982. “The Market as Prison.” The Journal of Politics 44 (2): 324–36. doi:10.2307/2130588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maks-Solomon, Cory. 2020. “‘Liberal Elite CEOs’ and Corporate Social Activism.” Working paper. https://corymaks.com/2019/09/17/ceos-and-corporate-activism/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Christopher, Margalit, Yotam, Malhotra, Neil, and Levendusky, Matthew. 2018. “The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1111/ajps.12330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, Debra E., and Scully, Maureen A.. 1995. “Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change.” Organization Science 6 (5): 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negro, Giacomo, and Olzak, Susan. 2019. “Which Side Are You On? The Divergent Effects of Protest Participation on Organizations Affiliated with Identity Groups.” Organization Science 30 (6): 1189–206. doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negro, Giacomo, Perretti, Fabrizio, and Carroll, Glenn R.. 2013. “Challenger Groups, Commercial Organizations, and Policy Enactment: Local Lesbian/Gay Rights Ordinances in the United States from 1972 to 2008.” American Journal of Sociology 119 (3): 790–832. doi:10.1086/673970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Benjamin J., and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2011. “Politics at the Checkout Line: Explaining Political Consumerism in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 803–17. doi:10.1177/1065912910379232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlander, Julianne, Batalova, Jeanne, and Treas, Judith. 2005. “Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations.” Social Science Research 34 (4): 781–99. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Danny, and Sibley, Chris G.. 2015. “Within the Limits of Civic Training: Education Moderates the Relationship Between Openness and Political Attitudes.” Political Psychology 36 (3): 295–313. doi:10.1111/pops.12070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phippen, J. Weston. 2017. “The Businesses Against the Texas Bathroom Bill.” The Atlantic, 17 July 2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/07/business-against-texas-bathroom-bill/533928/.Google Scholar
Raeburn, Nicole C. 2004. Changing Corporate America from Inside Out: Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights (Social Movements, Protest and Contention). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 2002. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Standard & Poor's/Compustat. 2018. Compustat Industrial [Quarterly Data]. (2011-2017). Retrieved from Wharton Research Data Service.Google Scholar
Streitfeld, David. 2017. “Activism Hits Even the Less Flashy Tech Companies.” International New York Times.Google Scholar
Turban, Daniel B., and Greening, Daniel W.. 1997. “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees.” Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–72. doi:10.2307/257057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Aken, Eileen M., Monetta, Dominic J., and Scott Sink, D.. 1994. “Affinity Groups: The Missing Link in Employee Involvement.” Organizational Dynamics 22 (4): 38–54. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(94)90077-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Welbourne, Theresa M., Rolf, Skylar, and Schlachter, Steven. 2015. “Employee Resource Groups: An Introduction, Review and Research Agenda” G15-13 (660). Los Angeles, CA: Center for Effective Organizations. Accessed 11 September 2018. https://ceo.usc.edu/files/2016/10/2015-13-G15-13-660-ERG_Introduction_Review_Research.pdf.Google Scholar
Werner, Timothy. 2012. “Public opinion and gay rights in the workplace.” In Public Forces and Private Politics in American Big Business, 88–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Maks-Solomon and Drewry Supplementary Materials

Maks-Solomon and Drewry Supplementary Materials

Download Maks-Solomon and Drewry Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 590.5 KB