Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:45:41.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unionization and the partisan effect on income inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

Does partisanship matter for income inequality? The empirical evidence is notably mixed. I argue that these inconsistent findings are partly the result of scholars not (properly) modeling the relationship between unionization and the partisan composition of government. If we accept that union members favor greater government intervention to reduce economic inequalities than non-union members, politicians desire to hold elected office and be popular but also to implement particular public policies, and left party politicians share union members’ policy preferences to a greater extent than center and right party politicians, then partisan differences should be greatest at moderate levels of unionization, a condition that allows all politicians to pursue their policy preferences while maintaining electoral viability. The empirical analysis examines 16 wealthy democracies between 1970 and 2010. The results of error-correction models confirm the theoretical expectation and hold regardless of whether there is a majoritarian or proportional representation electoral system.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, James. 2012. “Causes and Electoral Consequences in Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 401419.Google Scholar
Adams, James and Ezrow, Lawrence. 2009. “Who Do European Parties Represent? How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 206223.Google Scholar
Alderson, Arthur S. and Nielsen, François. 2002. “Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (5): 12441299.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John and McGinnis, Michael. 1989. “A Model of Party Constraints on Optimal Candidate Positions.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 12: 437450.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto F. and Giuliano, Paola. 2009. “Preferences for Redistribution.” NBER Working Paper 14825. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Allan, James and Scruggs, Lyle. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 496512.Google Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Knöpfel, Laura, Weisstanner, David, Engler, Sarah, Potolidis, Panajotis and Gerber, Marlène. 2013. Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2011. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Arts, Wil and Gelissen, John. 2002. “Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report.” Journal of European Social Policy 12 (2): 137158.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio. 2008. “Labour, Globalization, and Inequality: are Trade Unions Still Redistributive?” Discussion Paper 192. Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becher, Michael and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “Whose Interests do Unions Represent? Unionization by Income in Western Europe.” In Comparing European Workers Part B: Policies and Institutions (Research in the Sociology of Work, Volume 22), edited by Brady, David. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Beckfield, Jason. 2006. “European Integration and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 964985.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth, and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Strategies in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2010. “Redistribution Policies in a Globalized World.” Paper prepared for WTO-ILO volume on Making Globalization Sustainable. Google Scholar
Boix, Carles and Adserà, Alicia. 2000. “Must We Choose? European Unemployment, American Inequality and the Impact of Education and Labor Market Institutions.” European Journal of Political Economy 16: 611638.Google Scholar
Bradley, David and Stephens, John D. 2006. “Employment Performance in OECD Countries: A Test of Neoliberal and Institutionalist Hypotheses.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (12): 125.Google Scholar
Bradley, David, Huber, Evelyn, Moller, Steven, Nielsen, Francois, Stephens, and John D. 2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics 55 (2): 193228.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. “Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind.” International Organization 55 (3): 509551.Google Scholar
Cao, Xun, Prakash, Aseem, and Ward, Michael. 2007. “Protecting Jobs in the Age of Globalization: Examining the Relative Salience of Social Welfare and Industrial Subsidies in OECD countries.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (2): 301327.Google Scholar
Chinn, Menzie and Ito, Hiro. 2008. “A New Measure of Financial Openness.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10 (3): 309322.Google Scholar
Checchi, Daniele, Visser, Jelle and van de Werfhorst, Herman G. 2007. “Inequality and Union Membership: The Impact of Relative Earnings Position and Inequality Attitudes.” Discussion Paper 2691. Bonn: IZA Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
Clayton, Richard and Pontusson, Jonas. 1998. “Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies.” World Politics 51 (1): 6798.Google Scholar
Corneo, Giacomo and Gruner, Hans Peter. 2002. “Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 83 (1): 83107.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell. 1985. “Political Parties and Political Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 17 (3): 267299.Google Scholar
De Boef, Suzanna and Keele, Luke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 184200.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K. 2011. “Party-System Extremism in Majoritarian and Proportional Electoral Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 341361.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1990. “Caucus and Branch, Cadre Parties and Mass Parties.” In The West European Party System, edited by Mair, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 2009. “Economic Inequality and the Welfare State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, edited by Salverda, Wiemer, Nolan, Brian and Smeeding, Timothy M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence. 2011. “Reply to Dow: Party Positions, Votes and the Mediating Role of Electoral Systems?British Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 448452.Google Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence, De Vries, Catherine, Steenbergen, Marco and Edwards, Erica. 2011. “Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?Party Politics 17 (3): 275301.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. “Capital mobility, trade, and the domestic politics of economic policy.” International Organization 49 (4): 657687.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Way, Christopher. 1999. “Public Sector Unions, Corporatism, and Macroeconomic Performance.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (4): 411434.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam and Wallerstein, Michael. 2011. “Domestic and International Causes for the Rise of Pay Inequality in OECD Nations Between 1980 and 2000.” In Research in the Sociology of Work (22A), edited by Brady, David. London: Emerald Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Franzese, Robert Jr. 1998. “Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining, and European Monetary Union.” International Organization 52 (3): 502536.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander and Misra, Joya. 1993. “Political Resources and the Growth of Welfare in Affluent Capitalist Democracies, 1960–1982.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 668710.Google Scholar
Hoeller, Peter, Joumard, Isabelle, Pisu, Mauro, and Bloch, Debbie. 2014. “Mapping Income Inequality Across the OECD.” In Income Inequality in OECD Countries: What are the Drivers and Policy Options?, edited by Hoeller, Peter et al. New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Huber, John and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1 (1): 73111.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Nielsen, Francois, Pribble, Jenny and Stephens, John D. 2006. “Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 943963.Google Scholar
Huo, Jingjing, Nelson, Moira and Stephens, John D. 2008. “Decommodification and Activation in Social Democratic Policy: Resolving the Paradox.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (1): 520.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1994. “The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilizational Effects.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (2): 155189.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1996. “Power, Flexibility, and the Breakdown of Centralized Wage Bargaining: Denmark and Sweden in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 28 (4): 399436.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” The American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875893.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy.” World Politics 50 (7): 507546.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Cusack, Thomas. 2000. “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?World Politics 52 (3): 313349.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165182.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2009. “Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61 (3): 438–86.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2010. “Real Exchange Rates and Competitiveness: The Political Economy of Skill Formation, Wage Compression, and Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 601623.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2011. “Information, Interests, and Distributive Politics.” Preliminary draft prepared for presentation at Education, Religion, and the Gender-Vote-Gap. Bremen: University of Bremen.Google Scholar
Kang, Shin-Goo and Bingham Powell, G. Jr. 2010. “Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending.” The Journal of Politics 72 (4): 10141028.Google Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J. 2009. The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Nathan and Enns, Peter. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link Between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 855870.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane and Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. “Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 449471.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2002. “The Great Trough in Unemployment: A Long-Term View of Unemployment, Inflation, Strikes, and the Profit/Wage Ratio.” Politics and Society 30 (3): 365426.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2006. “Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics 58 (2): 167206.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter and Palme, Joakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review 63 (5): 661687.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter and Palme, Joakim. 2003. “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–1995.” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 425446.Google Scholar
Koske, Isabell, Fournier, Jean-Marc and Wanner, Isabelle. 2014. “The Distribution of Labor Income.” In Income Inequality in OECD Countries: What are the Drivers and Policy Options? edited by Hoeller, Peter, Joumard, Isabelle, and Koske, Isabell. New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Kwon, Hyeok Yong and Pontusson, Jonas. 2010. “Globalization, Labour Power and Partisan Politics Revisited.” Socio-Economic Review 8 (2): 251281.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael and Schofield, Norman. 1990. The Politics of Coalition in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma”. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review 9 (1): 114.Google Scholar
Mahler, Vincent. 2004. “Economic Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Income Inequality in the Developed Countries: A Cross-National Study,” Comparative Political Studies 37 (9): 10251053.Google Scholar
Mahler, Vincent, Jesuit, David and Paradowski, Piotr. 2013. “Political Sources of Government Redistribution in High-Income Countries.” In Income Inequality: Economic Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries, edited by Gornick, Janet C. and Jantii, Markus. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Nan L. 1990. “Changing Female Labor Force Participation: Influences on Income Inequality and Distribution.” Social Forces 68 (4): 12511266.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove and Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 859874.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove and Wallerstein, Michael. 2003. “Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending.” World Politics 55 (4): 485516.Google Scholar
Moon, Woojin. 2004. “Party Activists, Campaign Resources and Candidate Position Taking: Theory, Tests and Applications.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 611633.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana and Kelly, Nathan. 2013. “Market Inequality and Redistribution in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Journal of Politics 75 (3): 672685.Google Scholar
Muller, Wolfgang C. and Strom, Kaare. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, François and Alderson, Arthur S. 1995. “Income Inequality, Development, and Dualism: Results from an Unbalanced Cross-National Panel.” American Sociological Review 60 (5): 674701.Google Scholar
Nijhuis, Dennie O. 2009. “Revisiting the Role of Labor: Worker Solidarity, Employer Opposition, and the Development of Old-Age Pensions in the Netherlands and United Kingdom.” World Politics 61 (2): 296329.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OECD and J. Visser. 2013. ICTWSS (Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts, 1960–2010) database, version 3.0. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Pennings, Frans. 2013. “Social Security.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, edited by Greve, Bent. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Picketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plumper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera E. and Winner, Hannes. 2009. “Why is there No Race to the Bottom in Capital Taxation?International Studies Quarterly 53 (3): 761787.Google Scholar
Pontusson, J. 2013. “Trade Unions and Redistributive Politics.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 51 (4): 797825.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, Rueda, David and Way, Christopher. 2002. “Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labour Market Institutions.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 281308.Google Scholar
Prasad, Monica and Deng, Yingying. 2009. “Taxation and the Worlds of Welfare.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (3): 431457.Google Scholar
Reuveny, Rafael and Li, Quan. 2003. “Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (5): 575601.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rogers, William H. 1994. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin 3 (13): 1923.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions.” International Organization 41 (2): 203223.Google Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2002. “Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries,” International Organization 56 (2): 411445.Google Scholar
Rueda, David. 2008. “Left Government, Policy, and Corporatism: Explaining the Influence of Partisanship on Inequality.” World Politics 60 (3): 349389.Google Scholar
Rueda, David and Pontusson, Jonas. 2000. “Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics 52 (3): 350383.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth and Stasavage, David. 2009. “Institutions, Partisanship, and Inequality in the Long Run.” World Politics 61 (2): 215253.Google Scholar
Simoni, Marco. 2013. “The Left and Organized Labor in Low-Inflation Times.” World Politics 65 (2): 314349.Google Scholar
Solt, Frederick. 2009. “Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database.” Social Science Quarterly 90 (2): 231242. SWIID Version 3.1, December 2011.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 2013. Comparative Political Parties Dataset: Electoral, Legislative, and Government Strength of Political Parties by Ideological Group in 21 Capitalist Democracies, 1950–2011. Electronic Database. Milwaukee: Department of Political Science, Marquette University.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1993. “European Labor in Transition: Sweden and Germany Compared.” World Politics 46 (1): 2349.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle and Checchi, Daniele. 2009. “Inequality and the Labour Market: Unions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, edited by Salverda, Wiemer, Nolan, Brian and Smeeding, Timothy M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael. 1999. “Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 649680.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 2011. “Government Intentions and Citizen Preferences in Dynamic Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 599619.Google Scholar
Wenzelburger, Georg. 2014. “Blame Avoidance, Electoral Punishment and the Perceptions of Risk.” Journal of European Social Policy 24 (1): 8091.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1983. “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 142157.Google Scholar