Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T23:24:11.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Limits on negotiating behind the border barriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

Vinod K. Aggarwal  and
Simon J. Evenett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This special issue focuses on the difficulties of negotiating the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), with contributions by scholars from different perspectives. This introductory article briefly examines the trend to mega-FTAs of which TTIP is a leading example. It then reviews the contributions to this special issue, drawing on an analytical approach that reflects extant work on transnational and transgovernmental relations. This approach, we contend, helps to understand the stark mismatch between the desire of some parties to negotiate binding trade rules on behind-the-border regulatory policies in certain key sectors of national economies and the progress made in TTIP talks. We then highlight the significance of some key actors in a case study of failed E.U. attempts to include financial sector reforms and associated regulatory processes in TTIP.

Keywords

Mega-FTAstradeTTIPinternational negotiationsfinancial services
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 19 , Special Issue 4: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) , December 2017 , pp. 549 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2017 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For research assistance we are indebted to Christine Jiang, Katheryn Sehyen Lee, Charles Joy LI, Kevin Ratana Patumwat, and Taylor Pilossoph. We thank Chris Ansell and participants at conferences in Berkeley and Brussels for comments on earlier drafts of this article. We are particularly grateful for editing help by Andrew Reddie and Somi Yi. All remaining errors are our own. Aggarwal's work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2014S1A3A2044630). This project has been supported by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in San Francisco, the Institute of East Asian Studies, the Berkeley APEC Study Center, the E.U. Center for Excellence, the Clausen Center for International Business & Policy, UC Berkeley, and the University of St. Gallen.

References

Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2013. “U.S. Free Trade Agreements and Linkages.” International Negotiation 18(1): 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2016a. “Mega-FTAs and the Trade-Security Nexus: The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).” AsiaPacific Issues 123(March): 1–8.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2016b. “Introduction: The Rise of Mega-FTAs in the Asia-Pacific.” Asian Survey 56(6): 1,005–16. (Part of a Special Issue on Mega-FTAs in the Asia-Pacific, edited by Vinod K. Aggarwal.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Evenett, Simon. 2013. “A Fragmenting Global Economy: A Weakened WTO, Mega FTAs, and Murky Protectionism.” Swiss Political Science Review 19(4): 550–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod, Keohane, Robert, and Yoffie, David. 1987. “The Dynamics of Negotaited Protectionism.” American Political Science Review 81(2): 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, Shayerah, and Jones, Vivian. 2014. Proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP): In Brief. Congressional Research Service. 113th Congress, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
American Insurance Association. 2014. “AIA Supports Inclusion of Financial Services Regulation in TTIP.” (Accessed on 31 March 2015) https://www.aiadc.org/aiadotnet/docHandler.aspx?DocID=363888.Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Foundation. 2014. “Treasury big obstacle to financial sector's inclusion in TTIP; Survey shows optimism remains on deal.” Gütersloh, Germany.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 2013. “Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the European Union and the United States of America.” Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Crisp, James. 2014. “Derivatives dispute harming E.U.-U.S. free trade talks.” Euractiv.com. (Accessed on 20 May 2017) http://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/derivatives-dispute-harming-eu-us-free-trade-talks/.Google Scholar
Directorate-General for Trade, European Commission. 2017. “U.S.-E.U. Joint Report on TTIP Progress to Date.” Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. “E.U.-U.S. Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Cooperation on financial services regulation.” Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015. “Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other E.U. trade and investment negotiations.” Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
European Parliamentary Research Service, TTIP and Financial Services. 2015. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon J. 2007. “Five Hypotheses Concerning the Fate of the Singapore Issues in the Doha Round.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23(3): 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenett, Simon J. 2014. “The Doha Round impasse: A graphical account.” Review of International Organizations 9(2): 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evidence of Alistair Evans, Head of Government Affairs and Policy, Lloyd's. 2013.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger, Ury, William, and Patton, Bruce. 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gregg, Jude A. 2013. “U.S.-EU Trade Negotiations Must Include Financial Services,” Huffington Post. (Accessed on 23 May 2017) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judd-a-gregg/us-eu-trade-negotiations_b_3473601.html.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene and Helpman, Elhanan. 1995. “Trade wars and trade talks.” Journal of Political Economy 103(4): 675–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasury, HM. 2014. “Financial Regulation in the TTIP.” Written evidence submitted to the House of Lords inquiry into TTIP. London.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2013a. “Lew Resolute On Excluding Financial Services Regulations from TTIP Talks.” (Accessed 18 June 2014.) https://insidetrade.com/daily-news/lew-resolute-excluding-financial-rules-ttip-citing-potential-weakening-standards.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2013b.“MEP signals openness to broad ‘declaration’ on financial rules in TTIP.” (Accessed 18 June 2014.) https://insidetrade.com/daily-news/mep-signals-openness-broad-declaration-financial-rules-ttip.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2013c. “Froman Sees Exclusion Of Dodd-Frank Regulations From TTIP Talks.”Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2013d. “TTIP Financial Services Meeting Will Focus on E.U. Commission Proposal.” (Accessed 18 June 2014.) https://insidetrade.com/inside-us-trade/ttip-financial-services-meeting-will-focus-eu-commission-proposal.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2013e. “BusinessEurope warns TTIP deal without autos, procurement could fall flat.”Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2014a. “De Gucht signals flexibility on financial services regulations in TTIP.” (Accessed 20 October 2014.) https://insidetrade.com/daily-news/de-gucht-signals-flexibility-financial-services-regulations-ttip.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2014b. “AmCham E.U. Releases Updated List of Sector Specific TTIP Suggestions.” (Accessed on 20 October 2014.) https://insidetrade.com/inside-us-trade/amcham-eu-releases-updated-list-sector-specific-ttip-suggestions.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2014c. “EU to table services offer before TTIP round, without financial services.” (Accessed 20 October 2014.) https://insidetrade.com/inside-us-trade/eu-table-services-offer-ttip-round-without-financial-services.Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2015. “Hatch Touts Congressional Role in TPA; Says New Bill Will Not Be Major Rewrite.”Google Scholar
Inside U.S. Trade. 2016. “Lew says EU open to excluding financial sector regs from TTIP.”Google Scholar
Institute of International Finance. 2014. “Financial Industry Associations Urge TTIP Negotiators to Include Financial Services Regulatory Coordination in US-EU Trade Agreement.” Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Institute of International Finance. 2014. “U.S. and European Financial Services Trade Associations Statement on TTIP.” Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Johnson, Simon and Schott, Jeffrey. 2013. “Financial Services in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership,” Policy Brief PB13-26. Petersen Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Karl. 1969. “Transnational Politik: Zu einer Theorie der multinationale Politik,” Politische Vierteliahresschrift (Special Issue 1): 80–109.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph. 1974. “Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations.” World Politics 27(1): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, Pascal. 2015. “Looking ahead: The New World of Trade,” Jan Tumlir Lecture. European Centre for International Political Economy.Google Scholar
Lawson, Alex. 2014. “Obama Warned Of Weakening Finance Regs In E.U. Trade Talks,” Law 360. (Accessed on 15 May 2017) https://www.law360.com/consumerprotection/articles/601494/obama-warned-of-weakening-finance-regs-in-eu-trade-talks.Google Scholar
Lawton, David. 2013. Oral Evidence, House of Lords.Google Scholar
Lew, Jacob J. 2013. U.S. Government Printing Office. “The Annual Testimony of the Secretary of the Treasury on the State of the International Finance System.”Google Scholar
Peterson Institute for International Economics. 2014. “Developments in E.U.-U.S. Financial Services,” Event Transcript, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games.” International Organization 42(3): 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2017. “Principles of the trading system.” Geneva Switzerland.Google Scholar
Young, Alasdair R. 2016. “Not your parents’ trade politics: the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations.” Review of International Political Economy 23(3): 345–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar