Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:56:55.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social influence, competition and the act of lobbying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Direnç Kanol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the observed frequency of firm lobbying, scholars attempting to explain this behavior have had little luck. Pushing away from theories that center on firm characteristics, this paper argues that firm lobbying can be best explained with a sociological model of competitive action. In particular, firms that perceive other firms to have influence on policy are more likely to lobby policy-makers. Since firms are both competitors in a free market and socially embedded actors, their belief in other firms’ influence on policy pushes them to engage in similar behavior in order to increase profit and survive. I test this argument with a combination of quantitative analysis of survey responses from 7247 firms in 40 countries from the World Bank Enterprise Survey and seven qualitative interviews with key firms in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The results provide evidence for the hypothesis. This finding implies that scholars should not only take into account firm characteristics, but also explore the possible effects of how a firm's decision to lobby or not is influenced by its environment.

Type
Research articles
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 75 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, Gary. 1985. “Business Involvement in Campaign Finance: Factors Influencing the Decision to Form a Corporate PAC.” PS: Political Science and Politics 18 (2): 213–220.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David and Wright, John R. 1994. “Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 25–44.Google Scholar
Bailey, Elizabeth E. 1997. “Integrating Policy Trends into Dynamic Strategy.” In Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy, edited by Day, George S., Reibstein, David J., and Gunther, Robert E. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin IV, Pierskalla, J. and Weschle, Simon. 2014. “Lobbying and the Collective Action Problem: Comparative Evidence from Enterprise Surveys.” Business and Politics 16 (2): 221–246.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1995. “Integrated Strategy: Market and Nonmarket Components.” California Management Review 37 (2): 47–65.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank and Leech, Beth. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1191–1213.Google Scholar
Bhuyan, Sanjib. 2000. “Corporate Political Activities and Oligopoly Welfare Loss.” Review of Industrial Organization 17 (4): 411–426.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C., Daniel Hidalgo, F. and Richardson, Neal P. 2014. “The Spoils of Victory: Campaign Donations and Government Contracts in Brazil.” The Journal of Politics 76 (2): 415–429.Google Scholar
Boddewyn, Jean J. and Brewer, Thomas L. 1994. “International Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions.” Academy of Management Review 19 (1): 119–143.Google Scholar
Brasher, Holly and Lowery, David. 2006. “The Corporate Context of Lobbying Activity.” Business and Politics 8 (1): 1124–1134.Google Scholar
Devlet Planlama Örgütü. 2011. KKTC Nüfus ve Konut Sayımı. Available from: <http://www.devplan.org/Nufus-2011/nufus%20son_.pdf>. Accessed on 19 November 2014..+Accessed+on+19+November+2014.>Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 28 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drope, Jeffrey M. and Hansen, Wendy L. 2006. “Does Firm Size Matter? Analyzing Business Lobbying in the United States.” Business and Politics 8 (2): 1–17.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. and Caves, Richard. 1983. “Market Structure and Political Influence: New Data on Political Expenditures, Activity, and Success.” Economic Inquiry 21 (1): 24–38.Google Scholar
Faccio, Mara. 2006. “Politically Connected Firms.” American Economic Review 96 (1): 369–386.Google Scholar
Faccio, Mara and Parsley, David C. 2009. “Sudden Deaths: Taking Stock of Geographic Ties.” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis 44 (3): 683–718.Google Scholar
Fisman, R. 2001. “Estimating the Value of Political Connections.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 1095–1102.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil and McAdam, Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Getz, Kathleen A. 1996. “Politically Active Foreign-owned Firms in the US: Elephants or Chickens?” In Beyond Us and Them: Foreign Ownership and US Competitiveness, edited by Woodward, Douglas and Nigh, Douglas. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Getz, Kathleen A. 1997. “Research in Corporate Political Action: Integration and Assessment.” Business & Society 36 (1): 32–77.Google Scholar
Goldman, Eitan, Rocholl, Jörg and So, Jongil. 2013. “Political Connected Boards of Directors and the Allocation of Procurement Contracts.” Review of Finance 17 (5): 1617–1648.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grier, Kevin B., Munger, Michael C. and Roberts, Brian E. 1994. “The Determinants of Industry Political Activity, 1978–1986.” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 911–926.Google Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L. and Mitchell, Neil J. 2000. “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (4): 891–903.Google Scholar
Hansen, Wendy and Mitchell, Neil J. 2001. “Globalization or National Capitalism: Large Firms, National Strategies and Political Activities.” Business and Politics 3 (1): 5–19.Google Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L., Mitchell, Neil J. and Drope, Jeffrey M. 2005. “The Logic of Private and Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 150–167.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J. 2003. “Determinants of Political Strategies in US Multinationals.” Business & Society 42 (4): 455–484.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J. and Keim, Gerald D. 1995. “International Variation in the Business-government Interface.” Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 193–214.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J. and Hitt, Michael A. 1999. “Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation and Strategy Decisions.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 825–842.Google Scholar
Hillman, Amy J., Keim, Gerald D. and Schuler, Douglas. 2004. “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Management 30 (6): 837–857.Google Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas T. 2003. “Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying Across Multiple Venues.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (3): 325–336.Google Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas T. 2009. “Interest Group Competition and Coalition Formation.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 360–375.Google Scholar
Keiller, Bruce D. and Hult, G. T. M. 2004. “Predictors of Firm-level Political Behavior in the Global Business Environment: An Investigation of Specific Activities Employed by US Firms.” International Business Review 13 (3): 309–329.Google Scholar
Keim, Gerald and Baysinger, Barry. 1988. “The Efficacy of Business Political Activity: Competitive Considerations in a Principal Agent Context.” Journal of Management 14 (2): 163–180.Google Scholar
Khwaja, Asim I. and Mian, Atif. 2005. “Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in and Emerging Financial Market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1371–1411.Google Scholar
Kim, Jin-Hyuk. 2008. “Corporate Lobbying Revisited.” Business and Politics 10 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Koh, Wei Chern. 2011. “What Drives Firms’ Decisions to Lobby and Determinants of their Lobbying Positions: Evidence from Firms’ Comment Letter Submissions during FASB's Stock Option Expensing Proposal in 2004.” The International Journal of Accounting 46 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Lawton, Thomas, McGuire, Steven and Rajwani, Tazeeb. 2013. “Corporate Political Activity: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (1): 86–105.Google Scholar
Lowery, David. 2007. “Why do Organized Interests Lobby? A Multi-goal, Multi-context Theory of Lobbying.” Polity 39 (1): 29–54.Google Scholar
Lux, Sean, Russell Crook, T. and Woehr, David J. 2011. “Mixing Business with Politics: A Meta-analysis of the Antecedents and Outcomes of Corporate Political Activity.” Journal of Management 37 (1): 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, John F. and McGowan, Richard A. 1998. “Modeling Industry Political Dynamics.” Business & Society 37 (4): 390–413.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie J. 1995. “Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preference for National Health Reform.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 898–913.Google Scholar
Masters, Marick F. and Keim, Gerald D. 1985. “Determinants of PAC Participation Among Large Corporations.” Journal of Politics 47 (4): 1158–1173.Google Scholar
Mathur, Ike and Singh, Manohar. 2011. “Corporate Political Strategies.” Accounting & Finance 51 (1): 252–277.Google Scholar
McMenamin, Iain. 2013. If Money Talks, What Does it Say? Corruption and Business Financing of Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Abageil, Van Fleet, David and Cory, Kenneth D. 2002. “Raising Rivals’ Costs through Political Strategy: An Extension of Resource-based Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 39 (5): 707–723.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert. K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert. K. and Kitt, Alice R. 1950. “Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior.” In Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of the American Soldier, edited by Merton, Robert K. and Lazarsfeld, Paul F. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.Google Scholar
Meznar, Martin B. and Nigh, Douglas. 1995. “Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (4): 975–996.Google Scholar
Miles, Robert H. 1987. Managing the Corporate Social Environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Neil J., Hansen, Wndy L., and Jepsen, Eric M. 1997. “The Determinants of Domestic and Foreign Corporate Political Activity.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1096–1113.Google Scholar
Morrison, Allen J. and Roth, Kendall A. 1992. “Taxonomy of Business-Level Strategies in Global Industries.” Strategic Management Journal 13 (6): 399–417.Google Scholar
Nölke, Andreas and Vliegenhart, Arjan. 2009. “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe.” World Politics 61 (4): 670–702.Google Scholar
Oliver, Christine and Holzinger, Ingo. 2008. “The Effectiveness of Strategic Political Management: A Dynamic Capabilities Framework.” Academy of Management Review 33 (2): 496–520.Google Scholar
Olson, Marcur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mary K. 1994. “Political Influence and Regulatory Policy: The 1984 Drug Legislation.” Economic Inquiry 32 (3): 363–382.Google Scholar
Rehbein, Kathleen and Schuler, Douglas A. 1995. “The Firm as a Filter: A Conceptual Framework for Corporate Political Strategies.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (3): 406–410.Google Scholar
Richter, Brian K., Samphantharak, Krislert and Timmons, Jeffrey F. 2009. “Lobbying and Taxes.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 893–909.Google Scholar
Runciman, Walter G. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth Century Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sadrieh, Farid and Annavarjula, Madan. 2005. “Firm-specific Determinants of Corporate Lobbying Participation and Intensity.” International Journal of Public Administration 28 (1–2): 179–202.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben R. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schuler, Douglas A. 1996. “Corporate Political Strategy and Foreign Competitions: The Case of the Steel Industry.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (3): 720–737.Google Scholar
Schuler, Douglas A. 1999. “Corporate Political Action: Rethinking the Economic and Organizational Influences.” Business and Politics 1 (1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Schuler, Douglas A. and Rehbein, Kathleen. 1997. “The Filtering Role of the Firm in Corporate Political Involvement.” Business & Society 36 (2): 116–139.Google Scholar
Schuler, Douglas A., Rehbein, Kathleen and Cramer, Roxy D. 2002. “Pursuing Strategic Advantage through Political Means: A Multivariate Approach.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (4): 659–672.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Brian, Quasney, Thomas J. and Grimm, Curtis M. 2000. “Firm Level Performance: Implications of Nonmarket Actions.” Business and Society 39 (2): 126–143.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1): 3–21.Google Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A., Suchman, Edward A., DeVinney, Leland C., Star, Shirley A. and Williams, Robin M. 1949. The American Soldier: Vol. 1. Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sundaram, Anant K. and Stewart Black, J. 1992. “The Environment and Internal Organization of Multinational Enterprises.” The Academy of Management Review 17 (4): 729–757.Google Scholar
Teece, David J., Pisano, Gary and Shuen, Amy. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.Google Scholar
Thomas, Clive S., and Hrebenar, Ronald J. 2008. “Understanding Interest Groups, Lobbying and Lobbyists in Developing Democracies.” Journal of Public Affairs 8 (1–2): 1–14.Google Scholar
Vannoni, Matia. 2013. “The Determinants of Direct Corporate Lobbying in the EU: A Multidimensional Proxy of Corporate Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (1): 71–90.Google Scholar
Weymouth, Stephen. 2012. “Firm Lobbying and Influence in Developing Countries: A Multilevel Approach.” Business and Politics 14 (4): 1–26.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1994. “Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Smelser, Neil J. and Swedberg, Richard. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank Group. 2002–2005. World Bank Enterprise Survey (2002–2005). Raw Data. Washington DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Zardkoohi, Asghar. 1985. “On the Political Participation of the Firm in the Electoral Process.” Southern Economic Journal 51 (3): 804–817.Google Scholar