Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:53:31.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pro-Business Local Governance and (Local) Business Associations: The Case of Gaziantep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mustafa K. Bayirbag*
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University, Department of Political Science and Public Administration

Abstract

The article investigates how major changes in national economic policies, and in associated forms of state-business relations, produce pro-business local governance arrangements. It places the emphasis on the politics of state-business relations that revolve around the distribution of public resources. It aims to explain, in particular, how these dynamics unfold in the developing countries where neoliberal reforms are implemented under conditions of political instability and weak policy capacity of the state. The article focuses on the political mobilization of the local bourgeoisie through local business associations, as the major force behind the rise of pro-business local governance. It indicates that the emergent form a pro-business local governance scheme, especially when led by local business associations, will depend upon a) the degree of political autonomy of the local bourgeoisie from the national political actors (i.e, their distance to party politics); b) the composition of its constituency/supporters (or the class coalition behind it); c) the degree of their dependency on public resources. The arguments are elaborated in the case of the city of Gaziantep, Turkey.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2011 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, James and McCaffrey, Arthur. 2002. “Business leadership coalitions and public-private partnerships in American cities: a business perspective on regime theory.” Journal of Urban Affairs 24 (1): 3554.Google Scholar
Ay, Yavuz S. 1997. “Report on urban planning and development activities of Greater Gaziantep Municipality.” GBB Kültür Dergisi 1997.Google Scholar
Barkey, Henry. 1990. The state and the industrialisation crisis in Turkey. San Fransisco: Westview.Google Scholar
Bayırbağ, Mustafa K. 2007. “Local Entrepreneurialism, State Rescaling and Scalar Strategies of Representation: The Case of the City of Gaziantep, Turkey.” Ph.D. Diss., Carleton University, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Bayırbağ, Mustafa K. 2009. “Local entrepreneurialism and state rescaling in Turkey.” Urban Studies 47 (2): 363385.Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil. 2004. New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bekaroğlu, Mehmet. 2007. “Adil Düzen”den “Dünya Gerçekleri”ne, Siyasetin Sonu. Elips.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Robert. 1984. Interest groups and political development in Turkey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. 1994. Devlet ve İsadamları. Ankara: İletişim.Google Scholar
Bulut, Yakup. 2000. “Gaziantep'te büyükşehir yönetimine kentsel alt örgütlenmelerin katılımına ilişkin bir analiz.” Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi 9 (2): 3061.Google Scholar
Carroll, William K. and Shaw, Murray. 2001. “Consolidating a neoliberal policy bloc in Canada, 1976 to 1996.” Canadian Public Policy 27 (2): 195217.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel [1972] 1978. City, class and power (translation supervized by Lebas, Elisabeth). Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, Cal, Green, Johhny, and Grenell, Keenan. 2001. “Local regimes: does globalization challenge the growth machine?Policy Studies Review 18 (3): 4962.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Allan, Peck, Jamie, and Tickell, Adam. 1996. “Manchester plays games: Exploring the local politics of globalisation.” Urban Studies 33 (8): 13191336.Google Scholar
Coulson, Andrew. 1999. “Local business representation: can we afford TECs and chamber.” Regional Studies 33 (3): 269273.Google Scholar
Çokgezen, Murat. 2000. “New fragmentations and new cooperations in the Turkish bourgeoisie.” Environment and Planning C 18: 525544.Google Scholar
Demir, Ömer, Acar, Mustafa, and Toprak, Metin. 2004. “Anatolian Tigers or Islamic capital: prospects and challenges.” Middle Eastern Studies 40 (6): 166188.Google Scholar
Erder, Nejat. 2003. “Transcription of panel talk.” In Planlı kalkınma serüveni: 1960’larda Türkiyede planlama deneyimi. A panel held by Turkish Social Science Association. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Ergüder, Üstün. 1991. “The Motherland Party, 1983-1989.” In Political parties and democracy in Turkey, edited by Heper, Metin and Landau, Jacob M. London and New York: L. B. Tourins and L.G. Ltd. Google Scholar
Ersoy, Melih. 1992. “Relations between central and local governments in Turkey: a historical perspective.” Public Administration and Development 12: 325341.Google Scholar
Grant, Wyn. 1983. “Representing capital.” In Capital and politics, edited by King, Roger. London: Routledge (Direct Editions).Google Scholar
Grote, Jürgen R. 1992. “Small firms in the European Community: modes of production, governance and territorial interest representation in Italy and Germany.” In Organized Interests and the European Community, edited by Greenwood, Justin et al. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
GTO. 2005. Gaziantep by figures (GbF). Gaziantep: GTO Publications.Google Scholar
İsbir, Eyüp G. 2003. “Kamu kurumu niteliğindeki kuruluşlar: odalar (ticaret, sanayi, esnaf).” In Türkiye'de kamu yönetimi, edited by Aykaç, Burhan et al. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. 2002. “Elections and governance.” In Politics, parties, and elections in Turkey, edited by Sayarı, Sabri and Esmer, Yılmaz. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. 1989. Türkiye'de devlet ve sınıflar. Ankara: İletişim.Google Scholar
King, Roger. 1983. “The political practice of local business association.” In Capital and politics, edited by King, Roger. London: Routledge (Direct Editions).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Aaron and Hayter, Roger. 2006. “Business Associations and Local Development: The Okanagan Wine Industry's response to NAFTA.” Geoforum 37 (4): 596609.Google Scholar
Langille, David. 1987. “The Business Council on national Issues and the Canadian state.” Studies in Political Economy 24: 4185.Google Scholar
Lanzalaco, Luca. 1992. “Coping with heterogeneity: peak associations of business within and across Western European nations.” In Organized interests and the European Community, edited by Greenwood, Justin et al. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Laothomatas, Anek. 1992. Business associations and the new political economy of Thailand. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Logan, John R. and Molotch, Harvey L. 1990. Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. Berkeley, Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Eugene. 2003. “Framing space and time in the city: urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale.” Journal of Urban Affairs 25 (2): 159178.Google Scholar
Öncü, Ayşe. 1980. Chambers of industry in Turkey: an inquiry into stateindustry relations as a distributive domain.” In The political economy of income distribution in Turkey, edited by Özbudun, Ergun and Ulusan, Aydın. New York and London: Holmes and Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
Önder, İzzet. 2003. “Kapitalist ilişkiler bağlamında ve Türkiye'de devletin yeri ve işlevi.” In Küresel düzen: birikim, devlet ve sınıflar, edited by Köse, Ahmet H. et al. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Öngen, Tülin. 2003. “‘Yeni Liberal’ dönüşüm projesi ve Türkiye deneyimi.” In Küresel düzen: birikim, devlet ve sınıflar, edited by Köse, Ahmet H. et al. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. 1997. “The political economy of Islamic resurgence in Turkey: the rise of the Welfare Party in perspective.” Third World Quarterly 18 (4): 743766.Google Scholar
Özcan, Gül B. 2000. “Local economic development, decentralisation and consensus building in Turkey.” Progress in Planning 54 (4): 199278.Google Scholar
Özcan, Gül. B. 2006. “A critical analysis of decentralization and local economic development: the Turkish case.” Environment and Planning C 24: 117138.Google Scholar
Özsağır, Arif. 1999. “Cumhuriyetin 75. yılında Gaziantep sanayii.” In Cumhuriyetin 75. yılına armağan, edited by Küçükdağ, Yusuf. Gaziantep: Gaziantep Üniversitesi Vakfı Kültür Yayınları 6.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. 1995. “Moving and shaking: business élites, state localism and urban privatism.” Progress in Human Geography 19 (1): 1646 Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie and Tickell, Adam. 1995. “Business goes local: Dissecting the ‘Business Agenda’ in Manchester.” IJURR 19 (1): 5578.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie and Tickell, Adam. 2002. “Neoliberalizing space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380404.Google Scholar
Pierre, Jon. 2005. “Comparative urban governance: uncovering complex causalities.” Urban Affairs Review 40 (4): 446462.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. State, Power, Socialism. Verso.Google Scholar
Raco, Mike. 2003. “The social relations of business representation and devolved governance in the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning A 35 (10): 18531876.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lanzalaco, Luca. 1989. “Regions and the organization of business interests.” In Regionalism, business interests and public policy, edited by Coleman, William D. and Jacek, Henry J. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Sayarı, Sabri. 2002. “The changing party system.” In Politics, parties, and elections in Turkey, edited by Sayarı, Sabri and Esmer, Yılmaz. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo and Durand, Francisco. 1998. “Organized business and politics in Latin America.” In Organized business, economic change, and democracy in Latin America, edited by Silva, Eduardo and Durand, Franscisco. University of Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Schaede, Ulrike. 2000. Cooperative capitalism: self-regulation, trade associations, and the antimonopoly law in Japan. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 1989. “The territorial organization of interests and the logics of associative action: the case of Handwerk organization in West Germany.” In Regionalism, business interests and public policy, edited by Coleman, William D. and Jacek, Henry J. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Şengül, Hüseyin T. 2001. Kentsel çelişki ve siyaset. İstanbul: WALD.Google Scholar
Tickell, Adam and Peck, Jamie. 1996. “The return of the Manchester Men: Men's word and Men's deeds in the remaking of the local state.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (New Series) 21 (4): 595616.Google Scholar
Valler, David, Wood, Andrew, and North, Peter. 2000. “Local governance and local business interests: a critical review.” Progress in Human Geography 24 (3): 409428.Google Scholar
Valler, David and Wood, Andrew. 2004. “Devolution and the politics of business representation in Britain: a strategic-relational approach.” Environment and Planning A 36: 18351854.Google Scholar
Weiss, Linda. 1988. Creating capitalism: the state and small business since 1945. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, Peter J. 1989. Corporatism in perspective: an introductory guide to corporatist theory. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wood, Andrew, Valler, David, and North, Peter. 1998. “Local business representation and the private sector role in local economic policy in Britain.” Local Economy 13 (1): 1027.Google Scholar
Yalkın, H. 1999. “Transcription of conference talk.” In Esnaf-sanatkar ve küçük işletmeler mesleki kuruluşlarının yeni yönelimleri konferansı. Ankara: TESK, TESAR 29.Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik J. 1993. Turkey: a modern history. London and New York: I. B. Tauris and Co. Google Scholar