Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:11:49.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy entrepreneurship and the influence of the transnational financial industry in the EU reform of securitization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2019

Giuseppe Montalbano
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to most of the literature available so far, international and European cross-border banks and investments firms are considered the primary beneficiaries of the CMU and related revitalization of securitization. Nevertheless, an in-depth analysis of the transnational financial industry lobbying and influence, in the light of the final agreement on the securitization reform package, is still missing. This paper intends to fill this gap in the story by assessing if, and to what extent, the alleged industry beneficiaries played an active role in shaping the regulatory agenda within the CMU project and its related outcomes. An in-depth analysis of corporate lobbying in the securitization reform is thus provided, by looking at the interactions between structural and political contextual factors in shaping private/public coalitions along the different stages of the EU policy-making process. As it is argued here, the policy entrepreneurship of the European securitization industry has been the key factor to explain the emergence of the EU regulatory approach and its legislative outcomes.

Keywords

Capital Markets Unionissue saliencyfinancial industry lobbyingpolicy entrepreneurshipsecuritization
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: Ten Years of Regulatory Reform Since the International Financial Crisis: Understanding Bank Influence in the European and International Context , March 2020 , pp. 85 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2019 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME). 2014a. “High-quality securitization for Europe. The market at a crossroads.” London www.afme.eu/globalassets/downloads/publications/afme-high-quality-securitization-for-europe-the-market-at-a-crossroads.pdf.Google Scholar
AFME. 2014b. “An agenda for capital markets union,” November. London. https://www.afme.eu/globalassets/downloads/publications/an-agenda-for-capital-markets-union.pdf.Google Scholar
AFME. 2017. “Accelerating Capital Markets Union. AFME's response to the CMU Mid-Term Review Consultation,” 16 March. London. https://www.afme.eu/globalassets/downloads/consultation-responses/afme-cmu-accelerating-capital-markets-union.pdf.Google Scholar
AFME-EFAMA-ICMA-Insurance Europe. 2016. “Buy and sell side join forces in support of STS securitization.” Press release. https://www.insuranceeurope.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Buy%20and%20sell%20side%20join%20forces%20in%20support%20of%20STS%20securitization_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Baker, A. 2010. “Restraining regulatory capture? Anglo-America, crisis politics and trajectories of change in global financial governance.” International Affairs 86 (3): 647–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank of International Settlements (BIS). 2011. Report on asset securitization incentives. https://www.bis.org/publ/joint26.pdf.Google Scholar
Basel Committee of Banking Supervision (BCBS). 2011. Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems/ First version 2010. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.pdf.Google Scholar
Bavoso, V. 2016. “Simple, Transparent and Standardised. Business as usual?” FEPS Studies.Google Scholar
Bavoso, V. 2017. “High Quality Securitization and EU Capital Markets Union – Is it Possible?” Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium 7 (3): 1–29.Google Scholar
Bieling, H. J. 2003. “Social Forces in the Making of the New European Economy: The Case of Financial Market Integration.” New Political Economy 8 (2): 203–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, B. 2018. “Central banking and the infrastructural power of finance: the case of ECB support for repo and securitization markets.” Socio-Economic Review 0 (0): 1–24.Google Scholar
Braun, B., and Hübner, M.. 2018. “Fiscal fault, financial fix? Capital Markets Union and the Quest for macro-economic stabilization in the Euro-Area.” Competition and Change 0 (0): 1–22.Google Scholar
Braun, B., Gabor, D., and Hübner, M.. 2018. “Governing through financial markets: Towards a critical political economy of Capital Markets Union.” Competition and Change.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business Insider. 2016. “British banks are lagging behind Europe and may never be as profitable as they were pre-crisis.” http://uk.businessinsider.com/financial-times-analysis-of-uk-bank-profits-2016-4.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 2015. Presidency Compromise. 2015/0226 (COD). http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14537-2015-INIT/en/pdf.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P. 2010. Quiet Politics and Business Power Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, P. 2015. “Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, P. D., and Reinke, R.. 2014.” Structural power and bank bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Politics & Society 42 (4): 427–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bò, E. 2006. “Regulatory Capture: A Review.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (2): 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, N. 2016. “Capital cohabitation: EU Capital Markets Union as public and private co-regulation.” Capital Markets Law Journal 11 (1): 84–102.Google Scholar
Dow Jones Newswires. 2010. ECB Official Says Securitization Is Vital Funding Tool. 1 March (retrieved from Factiva).Google Scholar
Dür, A. 2008. “Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology.” European Union Politics 9 (4): 559–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Banking Authority (EBA). 2014. Discussion Paper on simple standard and transparent securitizations. 14 October. https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/846157/EBA-DP-2014-02+Discussion+Paper+on+simple+standard+and+transparent+securitizations.pdf.Google Scholar
European Central Bank (ECB). 2016. ECB Working Paper Series. The collateral channel of open market operations. No. 1906. May. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1906.en.pdf?185b52a8316c5382bd9afe04ac85945d.Google Scholar
ECB-BoE. 2014a. The Impaired EU securitization Market: Causes, Roadblocks and How to Deal With Them. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/news/2014/paper070.pdf.Google Scholar
ECB-BoE. 2014b. The case for a better functioning securitization market in the European Union. Discussion Paper, 29 May. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb-boe_case_better_functioning_securitization_marketen.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011a. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms […] COM(2011) 453 final. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/bank/docs/regcapital/CRD4_reform/20110720_directive_proposal_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011b. Commission 2011b. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms, COM(2011) 452 final. Brussels, 20.7.2011. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/legal/pdf/st13284.en.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013a. Green Paper. Long-Term Financing of the European Economy. COM(2013) 150 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0150&from=EN.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2013b. Contributions. Consultation Long Term Financial of the European Economy. http://ec.europa.eu/finance/consultations/2013/long-term-financing/contributions_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014a. COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on Long-Term Financing of the European Economy, COM(2014) 168 final, Brussels, 27.3. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/docs/financing-growth/long-term/140327-communication_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014b. A new start for Europe, July 15. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-567_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015a. Consultation Document: An EU framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitization. http://ec.europa.eu/finance/consultations/2015/securitization/docs/consultation-document_en.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015b. Published Results: securitization 2015. Statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/publication/securitization-2015?language=en.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015c. Commission. Published Results: securitization. https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/publication/securitization-2015?language=en.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015d. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down common rules on securitization and creating a European framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitization […] COM(2015) 472 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015PC0472&from=EN.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015e. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. COM(2015) 473 final. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-473-EN-F1-1.PDF.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2017. Capital Markets Union: EU reaches agreement on reviving securitization market. Press release. 30 May. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1480_en.htm?locale=en.Google Scholar
European Financial Services Roundtable (EFR). 2012a. PCS Fact Sheet. http://www.efr.be/documents/news/PCS%20fact%20sheet%2020120612.pdf.Google Scholar
EFR. 2012b. How regulation can preserve the contribution of financial firms to economic growth in Europe, November. http://www.efr.be/documents/publication/EFR%2520growth%2520report%252020121126.pdf+&cd=1&hl=it&ct=clnk&gl=it&client=firefox-b-ab.Google Scholar
EFR-AFME. 2012. Finance Industry Launches ‘PCS’ Securitization Label to Revitalise Market. Press Release, 12 June. https://www.afme.eu/en/news/press-releases/2012/financeindustrylaunchespcssecuritizationlabeltorevitalisemarket/.Google Scholar
Engelen, E.2015a. The Trojan Horse of European Capital Markets Union. Follow The Money: https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/the-trojan-horse-of-europes-capital-markets-union-cmu.Google Scholar
Engelen, E.2015b. The Trojan Horse of Europe's Capital Markets Union. Part II. Follow the Money, https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/the-trojan-horse-of-europes-capital-markets-union-part-ii.Google Scholar
Engelen, E., and Glasmacher, A.. 2016a. “Simple, Transparent And Standardized” Narratives, Law And Interest Coalitions In Regulatory Capitalism.” Paper Prepared for the MPIfG Workshop on “Financial Innovation, Diffusion And Institutionalization: The Case Of Securitization.Google Scholar
Engelen, E., and Glasmacher, A.. 2016b. “The Trojan Horse of Europe's Capital Markets Union. Part III.” https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/the-trojan-horse-of-europes-capital-markets-union-part-iii.Google Scholar
Engelen, E., and Glasmacher, A.. 2018. The waiting game: How Securitization became the solution for the growth problem of the Eurozone. Competition and Change 0 (0): 1–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Epstein, L., and Segal, J.A.. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertürk, I. 2015. “Challenges of financialised firm behaviour for Capital Markets Union.” Law and Financial Markets Review 9 (3): 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EU. 2017a. REGULATION (EU) 2017/2402 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 12 December 2017 laying down a general framework for securitization and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitization […]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R2402&from=EN.Google Scholar
EU. 2017b. REGULATION (EU) 2017/2401 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 12 December 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R2401&from=EN.Google Scholar
European Parliament (EP). 2016a. Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common rules on securitization […] 2015/0226(COD). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2016-0387+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.Google Scholar
EP. 2016b. Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. 2015/0225(COD). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2016-0388+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.Google Scholar
Euroweek. 2011a. “ABS in line for surprise pardon as covered, senior markets falter.” 17 June. https://www.globalcapital.com/article/k4n0dfk7l8qb/abs-in-line-for-surprise-pardon-as-covered-senior-markets-falter.Google Scholar
Euroweek. 2011b. “Making the world believe in securitization again.” 28 September. (retrieved from Factiva).Google Scholar
Exchange News Direct. 2012. “Irish Stock Exchange Given Key Role To Monitor Standards Of Debt Securitizations In Europe.” 16 November (retrieved from Factiva).Google Scholar
Fernandez, R., and Aalbers, M.B.. 2017. “Capital Market Union and residential Capitalis in Europe: Rescaling the housing-centred model of financialisation.” Finance and Society 3 (1): 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Services Authority (FSA). 2009. “The Turner Review. A regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis.” London.Google Scholar
Gill, S., and Law, D.. 1993. “Global Hegemony and the Structural Power Capital.” In Gill, S., Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, 93–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gònzalez-Pàramo, J. M. 2010. Keynote speech. AFME/ESF and Information Management Network Global ABS, 2010 Conference. London, 16 June 2010. https://www.bis.org/review/r100621f.pdf.Google Scholar
Handelsblatt. 2009. Verbriefungen erleben großes Comeback, by Peter Köhler. 5 August. http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/banken-versicherungen/mittelstandsfinanzierung-verbriefungen-erleben-grosses-comeback/3231480.html.Google Scholar
Helleiner, E., and Pagliari, S.. 2011. “The end of an era in international financial regulation? A postcrisis research agenda.” International Organization 65 (1): 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Financial Law Review (IFLR). 2012. BNP Paribas: how to save European securitization. 13 September. http://www.iflr.com/Article/3089005/BNP-Paribas-how-to-save-European-securitization.html.Google Scholar
Italian Presidency of the Council. 2014. Promoting investment On-going initiatives and the role of Ecofin (Informal Ecofin – Breakfast meeting, Milan, 13 September. http://www.tesoro.it/inevidenza/documenti/Issues_note_Informal_Breakfast_Promoting_Investment.pdf.Google Scholar
Jabko, N. (2006). Playing the market: A political strategy for uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Joint Note. 2016. Joint Note on the EU Commission's Proposals on Simple, Transparent and Standardised Securitization. http://pcsmarket.org/draft/wp-content/uploads/publications/86a4f/STS_and_CRR_letter.pdf.Google Scholar
Kastner, L. 2017. Civil Society and Financial Regulation. Consumer Finance Protection and Taxation after the Financial Crisis. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastner, L. 2018. “Business lobbying under salience – financial industry mobilization against the European financial transaction tax.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (11): 1648–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, E. 2018. Noisy business politics: lobbying strategies and business influence after the financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (3) 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 2014. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Second Edition. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Lall, R. 2012. “From failure to failure: The politics of international banking regulation.” Review of International Political Economy 19 (4): 609–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macartney, H. 2011. “Finance Unravelled: A Historical Materialist Analysis of EU Public Policy.” Competition and Change 15 (1): 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, C. 2008. Brussels Versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. 2012. The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research 41 (4): 570–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, W., and Woods, N. (eds.). 2009. “In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, 1–43. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, M., and Norman, P.. 2009. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (4): 649–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, M., and Vergari, S.. 1996. “Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 24 (3): 420–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mügge, D. 2010. Widen the Market, narrow the competition. Banker interests and the making of a European capital market. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 2011. Global Insurance Market Trends. http://www.oecd.org/pensions/insurance/49108065.pdf.Google Scholar
Pagliari, S., and Young, K. L.. 2014. “Leveraged interests: Financial industry power and the role of private sector coalitions.” Review of International Political Economy 21 (3): 575–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PCS. 2013. Europe in transition. Bridging the funding gap. White Paper. March. http://pcsmarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Europe-in-Transition-Bridging-the-Funding-Gap1.pdf.Google Scholar
Pesendorfer, D. 2015. “Capital Markets Union and ending short-termism: lessons from the European Commission's public consultation.” Law and Financial Markets Review 9 (3): 202–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E. (2005). “Sources of institutional change: the supranational origins of Europe's new stock markets.” World Politics 58 (1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E. (2009). The origins of Europe's new stock markets. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quaglia, L., and Howarth, D.. 2018. “The policy narratives of European capital markets union.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (7): 990–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaglia, L., Howart, D., and Lieb, M.. 2016. “The Political Economy of European Capital Markets Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54: 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters. 2011. “Signs of easing in regulatory bias against ABS,” 16 December. (retrieved from Factiva).Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015. “US large banks soared their profits since the financial crisis.” http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-banks-marketmaking-idUSKCN0S11KS20151007.Google Scholar
Ringe, W.G. 2015. “Capital Markets Union for Europe: a commitment to the Single Market of 28.” Law and Financial Markets Review 9 (1): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Roland. (2014). Financial Performance of European Insurers. Paris. https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_performance_of_european_insurers_20140908.pdf.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W., and Zysman, J.. 1989. “1992: Recasting the European Bargain.” World Politics 42 (1): 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., and Sandholtz, A. (eds.). 1998. “Integration, Supranational Governance, and the Institutionalization of the European Polity.” In European Integration and Supranational Governance, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2014. “Berlin und Paris starten Investitionsoffensive,” 9 September. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/wirtschaftsflaute-in-europa-berlin-und-paris-starten-investitionsoffensive-1.2120735.Google Scholar
Tsingou, E. 2008. “Transnational private governance and the Basel process: Banking regulation and supervision, private interests and Basel II.” In Transnational Private Governance and its Limits, by Graz, J.-C. and Nölke, A., 58–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsingou, E. 2010. “Regulatory reactions to the global credit crisis: analyzing a policy community under stress.” In Global finance in crisis: the politics of international regulatory change, edited by Helleiner, E., Pagliari, S., and Zimmermann, H., 35–50. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Underhill, G. R., and Zhang, X.. 2008. “Setting the rules: private power, political underpinnings, and legitimacy in global monetary and financial governance.” International Affairs 84 (3): 535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Apeldoorn, B. 2002. Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van der Pijl, K. 1998. Transnational Classes and International Relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
VDA, BDI, AK. 2013. Position on the proposed changes in the regulatory framework for credit securitizations, May. https://www.vda.de/dam/vda/Medien/EN/Themen/Automobilindustrie-und Maerkte/Autobanken/20130604_Position_Verbriefungen_final_eng_docx.pdf.Google Scholar
Woll, C. 2013. “Lobbying under Pressure: The Effect of Salience on European Union Hedge Fund Regulation.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (3): 555–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woll, C. 2014. Bank Rescue Schemes in Continental Europe: The Power of Collective Inaction. Government and Opposition 49 (3): 426–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woll, C. 2016. Politics in the Interest of Capital: A Not-So-Organized Combat. Politics and Society 44 (3): 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, K. 2013. “Financial industry groups' adaptation to the post-crisis regulatory environment: Changing approaches to the policy cycle.” Regulation & Governance 7 (4): 460–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar