Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T00:15:26.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of meta-standardization upon standards convergence: the case of the international accounting standard for off-balance-sheet financing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthias Thiemann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analyses of transnational governance formation point to the destabilizing effects transnational standard setters have upon national institutional configurations. Isomorphic pressures, it is argued, lead to the standardization of procedures used and actors involved in standard setting processes. What is not clear, however, is to what extent this meta-standardization increases the chances for convergence of national with transnational standards. This article explores this question for the case of the international accounting standard for off-balance-sheet financing in the Netherlands, France and Germany. It argues that the reconfiguration of domestic governance architectures had a decisive impact on convergence processes. Counter-intuitively, copying goals, membership and procedures of the transnational, private International Accounting Standards Committee limited the chances of rule convergence, as it threatened to deinstitutionalize the standard-setting role of an important national champion of rule-convergence, the banking regulator. The institutional template developed at the transnational level created actor-mismatch at the national level between those formulating and those implementing the rules, thereby weakening the coalition for rule change. A strong coalition, however, is needed to overcome vested business interests that favor convergence with transnational templates for legitimacy gains at the same time that they oppose convergence to contentious rules that limit their business activities.

Type
Symposium on ‘Multiplicity and Plurality in the World of Standards’, Guest Editors: Frank den Hond and Marie-Laure Djelic
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 79 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2014 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth and Snidal, Duncan. 2009. “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards, Institutions and the Shadow of the State: Regulatory Standards, Institutions and the Shadow of the State.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Viral V. and Schnabl, Phillip. 2009. “Do Global Banks Spread Global Imbalances? The Case of Asset-Backed Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009.” Paper presented at the 10th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, The International Monetary Fund Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Acharya, Viral V., Schnabl, Phillip, and Suarez, Gustavo. 2009. “Securitization without Risk Transfer.” Paper presented at the Research Seminar, The Federal Reserve Board of Governers, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
Baker, C. Richard and Barbu, Elena M. 2007. “Evolution of Research on International Accounting Harmonization: a Historical and Institutional Perspective.” Socio-Economic Review 5 (4): 603–632.Google Scholar
Ballwieser, Wolfgang. 2010. “Germany.” In A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Europe. Studies in the Development of Accounting Thought, edited by Previts, Gary. J., Walton, Peter J. and Wolnizer, Peter. Sydney, Australia: Emerald.Google Scholar
Benston, George J., Bromwich, Michael, Litan, Robert E., and Alfred, Wagenhofer. 2006. Worldwide Financial Reporting: The Development and Future of Financial Reporting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biener, Herbert. 2000. “Das DRSC: Aufgaben und Perspektiven.” In Die Zukunft des deutschen Bilanzrechts im Zeichen internationaler Rechnungslegung und privater Standardsetzung, edited by Kleindiek, Detlef and Oehler, Wolfgang. Koeln: Dr. Otto Schmidt.Google Scholar
Black, Julia. 2008. “Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation.” London School of Economics, Law, Society and Economy Working Paper: 1–36.Google Scholar
Bocqueraz, Claude. 2010. “France.” In A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Europe. Studies in the Development of Accounting Though, edited by Previts, Gary J., Walton, Peter J., and Wolnizer, Peter. Sydney, Australia: Emerald.Google Scholar
Botzem, Sebastian. 2012. The Politics of Accounting Regulation – Organizing Transnational Standard Setting in Financial Reporting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Botzem, Sebastian and Quack, Sigrid. 2006. “International Standard-Setting in Accounting.” In Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, edited by Djelic, Marie-Laure and Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Botzem, Sebastian and Quack, Sigrid. 2009. “(No) Limits to Anglo-American Accounting? Reconstructing the History of the International Accounting Standards Committee: A Review Article.” Accounting, Organization and Society 34 (8): 988–998.Google Scholar
Botzem, Sebastian and Dobusch, Leonhard. 2012. “Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 737–762.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010(a). “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P) Review.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–40.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010(b). “Engineering Uncontestedness? The Origins and Institutional Development of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–62.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burlaud, Alain and Colasse, Bernard. 2010. “International Accounting Standardization: is Politics Back?” Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit 16 (3): 153–176.Google Scholar
Camfermann, Kees and Zeff, Stephen. 2007. Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chantiri-Chaudemanche, Ruba. 2009. 2nd. edition. “Organismes de Normalisation.” In Encyclopédie de Comptabilité, contrôle de gestion et audit, edited by Colasse, Bernard. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Chantiri-Chaudemanche, Ruba and Pochet, Christine. 2012. “La normalisation comptable: l'expert, le politique et la mondialisation.” In Comptabilité, Société, Politique, edited by Nikitin, Marc and Richard, Chrystelle. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Choi, F. and Meek, G. K. 2005. International Accounting. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Clift, Ben and Woll, Cornelia. 2012. “Economic Patriotism: Reinventing Control Over Open Markets.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (3): 307–323.Google Scholar
Colasse, Bernard and Pochet, Christine. 2009. “The Genesis of the 2007 Conseil National de la Comptabilite: A Case of Institutional Isomorphism?” Accounting in Europe 6 (1): 25–55.Google Scholar
Cooper, David and Robson, Keith. 2006. “Accounting, Professions and Regulation: Locating the Sites of Professionalization.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (4/5): 415–444.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 1998. Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2003. “Introduction.” In Globalizations and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game, edited by Djelic, Marie-Laure and Quack, Sigrid. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2007. “Overcoming Path Dependency: Path Generation in Open Systems.” Theory and Society 36 (2): 161–186.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2008. “Institutions and Transnationalization.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Greenwood, Royston et al. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2011. “The Power of Limited Liability: Transnational Communities and Cross-Border Governance.” In Communities and Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 33), edited by Marquis, Christopher, Lounsbury, Michael and Greenwood, Royston. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.Google Scholar
Eaton, Sarah. 2005. “Crisis and the Consolidation of International Accounting Standards: Enron, the IASB, and America.” Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2005. “When Less is More: Selection Problems in Large- N and Small- N Cross-National Comparisons.” International Sociology 20 (2): 133–152.Google Scholar
Commission, European. 1995. Accounting Harmonization: A New Strategy vis-à-vis International Harmonization. Commission Communication COM 95 (508).Google Scholar
Commission, European. 1999. Financial Services-Implementing the Framework for Financial Markets: Action Plan. Commission Communication of 11.05.1999 COM (1999) 232.Google Scholar
Commission, European. 2000. EU Financial Reporting Strategy: the Way Forward. Commission Communication (2000) 359.Google Scholar
Parliament, European. 2002. REGULATION (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the Application of International Accounting Standards. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002R1606:EN:HTML.Google Scholar
European Securitization Forum. 2002. Letter to IASB Re: Consolidation and SIC 12. Accessible at: www.sifma.org/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=1022; last accessed April 21, 2012.Google Scholar
Fiss, Peer C. 2009. “Case Studies and the Configurational Analysis of Organizational Phenomena.” In The Sage Handbook of Case Based Methods, edited by Byrne, David and Ragin, Charles. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Doris and Kalfagianni, Agni. 2010. “The Causes and Consequences of Private Food Governance.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–34.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gorton, Gary B. 2010. Slapped by the Invisible Hand: The Panic of 2007. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2010. “Private Standards in the Climate Regime: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–37.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David. (eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 7–34.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C. 2009. “Recursivity of Global Normmaking: A Sociolegal Agenda.” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 5: 263–289.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C. and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2007. “The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (4): 1135–1202.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. L. 2009. “Complexity and Case.” In The Sage Handbook of Case Based Methods, edited by Byrne, David and Ragin, Charles C. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Martin. 2010. “Finanzmarktregulierung-Welche Regelungen empfehlen sich für den deutschen und europäischen Finanzsektor.” In Verhandlungen des 68. Juristentages, edited by Ständige Deputation des Deutschen Juristentages. Muenchen: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hoarau, Christian. 2010. “La nouvelle gouvernance du normalisateur comptable Français.” In La gouvernance juridique des organisations, edited by Rossignol, Jean-Luc. Paris: Editions Lavoisier.Google Scholar
International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). 1989. Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. International Accounting Standards Committee, 166 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Peter. 2002. “International Harmonization of Accounting Standards, and the Question of Off-Balance Sheet Treatment.” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 12: 341–351.Google Scholar
Larsson, Robert K. 2008. “Examination of Comment Letters Submitted to the IASC: Special Purpose Entities.” Research in Accounting Regulation 20: 27–47.Google Scholar
Malets, Olga. 2013. “The Translation of Transnational Voluntary Standards into Practices: Civil Society and the Forest Stewardship Council in Russia.” Journal of Civil Society 9 (3): 300–324.Google Scholar
Martinez-Diaz, Leo. 2005. “Strategic Experts and Improvising Regulators: Explaining the IASC's Rise to Global Influence, 1973–2001.” Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–22.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter and Büthe, Tim. 2005. “Global Private Governance: Lessons from a National Model of Setting Standards.” Accounting, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3/4): 225–262.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire. 2009. “In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 2009. Über Governance – Institutionen und Prozesse Politischer Regelung. New York: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
McLeay, Stuart, Dieter, Ordelheide and Young, Steven. 2000. “Constituent Lobbying and Its Impact on the Development of Financial Reporting Regulations Evidence from Germany.” Accounting, Organization and Society 25 (1): 79–102.Google Scholar
Meyer, John and Rowan, Brian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.Google Scholar
Morgan, Glenn. 2005. “Institutional Complementarities, Path Dependency and the Dynamics of Firms.” In Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change and Systems of Economic Organization, edited by Morgan, Glenn et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2010. “Regulating Globally, Implementing Locally: The Financial Codes and Standards Effort.” Review of International Political Economy 17: (4): 724–761.Google Scholar
Noelke, Andreas. 2005. “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Globalization of Accounting Standards.” Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–7.Google Scholar
Noelke, Andreas and Perry, James. 2007. “The Power of Transnational Private Governance: Financialization and the IASB.” Business and Politics 9 (3): 1–27.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Samuel. 1976. “Towards a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.Google Scholar
Posner, Elliott. 2010. “Sequence as Explanation: The International Politics of Accounting Standards.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 639–664.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Carlos. 2010. “Promoting Transnational Professionalism: Forays of the ‘Big Firm’ Accounting Community in France.” In Transnational Communities, edited by Djelic, Marie-Laure and Quack, Sigrid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan J. and Eberlein, Burkard. 2011. “Legitimating Transnational Standard- Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board.” Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2): 217–245.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Somers, Margaret. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–197.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science 2: 3–21.Google Scholar
Strasser, Kurt and Blumberg, Phillip. 2011. “Legal Form and Economic Substance of Enterprise Groups: Implications for Legal Policy.” Accounting, Economics and the Law 1 (4): 1–30.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Institutional Changes in Advanced Political Economies. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tamm Hallström, Kristina. 2004. Organizing international standardization. ISO and the IASC in quest of authority. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Thiemann, M. 2012. “Out of the Shadow? Accounting for Special Purpose Entities in European banking systems.” Competition and Change 16 (1): 37–55.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan and Epstein, Steven. 2010. “A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89.Google Scholar
Van Hulle, Karl. 1993. “Harmonization of Accounting Standards in the EC. Is it the Beginning or is it the End?” European Accounting Review 2 (2): 387–396.Google Scholar
Walton, Peter. 2008. La comptabilité anglo-saxon. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Zeff, Stephen A., Van der Wel, Frans and Camfferman, Kees. 2002. “A Reflection on Company Financial Reporting After 10 years.” Externe Verslaggeving November 2002: 513–519.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Jochen, Werner, Joerg R. and Volmer, Philipp B. 2008. Global Governance in Accounting- Rebalancing Public Power and Private Commitment. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar