Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:09:29.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finding the Right Chemistry: The U.S. Chemical Industry in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kun-Chin Lin
Kun-Chin Lin*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
Department of Political Science, 210 Barrows Hall #1970, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720–1970. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of U.S. chemical firms' corporate strategies in Asia over the past decade. Prior to the Asian financial crisis, these firms treated the Asian market as an expansion outlet due to a persistent lack of growth in Western markets. Since the crisis, U.S. firms have reformulated their market and organizational strategies to better withstand disruptions of business or product life cycles, specifically through refocusing core competence and establishing regional production networks. Meanwhile, their nonmarket strategies have lagged behind market strategies in specificity and sensitivity to the Asian context. This article explores the early effort in safety and environmental self-governance of the chemical firms in Asia, and argues that the history of domestic competition and government-business relations in the home market has to a large degree determined the transnational strategies of U.S. firms. Finally, U.S. chemical firms strategies are increasingly dependent on the behavior of their Asian competitors - in particular whether Asian producers enter into alliances with U.S. firms or resist liberalization and regional market interpenetration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 2001 , pp. 185 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2001 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2001. “Analyzing European Firms’ Market and Nonmarket Strategy in Asia.” In Winning in Asia, European Style: Market and Nonmarket Strategies for Success, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Agmon, Tamir and Hekman, Christine R. 1989. Trade Policy and Corporate Business Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arora, Ashish, Landau, Ralph, and Rosenberg, Nathan. 1998. Chemicals and Long-Term Economic Growth. New York: John Wiley & Sons, InC. Google Scholar
Buckley, Peter J. 1998. International Strategic Management and Government Policy. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, Jonathan. 1999. “Globalization, International Corporation Alliances, and Political Conflict.” Business and Politics 1, 3: 343–374.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, Sumantra and Eleanor Westney, D. 1993. Organizational Theory and the Multinational Corporation. London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Edward M. 1997. “U.S. direct investment abroad and U.S. exports in the manufacturing sector: some empirical results based on cross-sectional analysis.” In Multinational Firms and International Relocation, edited by Buckley, Peter J. and Mucchielli, Jean-Louis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Martinelli, Alberto, ed. 1991. International Markets and Global Firms. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Newfarmer, Richard. 1985. “International Industrial Organization and Development: A Survey.” In Profits, Progress and Poverty, edited by Newfarmer, Richard. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace, Palmer, Karen, and Portney, Paul. 1993. “Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness: Thinking About the Porter Hypothesis.” Discussion paper published by Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, Robert L. 1995. “Managing Pesticide Use in Developing Countries.” In Institutions for the Earth, edited by Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert, and Levy, Marc A. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pharr, Susan J. and Badaracco, Joseph L. Jr. 1986. “Coping with Crisis: Environmental Regulation.” In American vs. Japan, edited by McCraw, Thomas K. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Ruigrok, Winfried and van Tulder, Rob. 1995. The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rugman, Alan M. and Verbeke, Alain. 1990. Global Corporate Strategy and Trade Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard. 1993. “Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness.” Yale Law Journal 102: 2039–2106.Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1998. Shifts in Merchandise Trade in 1997. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Vig, Norman and Kraft, Michael E. 1997. Environmental Policy in the 1990s, 3rd Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar