Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:35:28.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining variation in the multiplicity of private social and environmental regulation: a multi-case integration across the coffee, forestry and textile sectors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Marie-France Turcotte ,
Juliane Reinecke  and
Frank den Hond
Juliane Reinecke
Affiliation:
Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Frank den Hond
Affiliation:
Hanken School of Economics (and VU University, Amsterdam), Department of Management and Organization, PO Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amid concerns for a regulatory void in transnational fields, the principle of private regulation has become institutionalized. Many sectors have seen the emergence of multiple and overlapping standards. When comparing the sectors, there is considerable variation in standard multiplicity. We build on three institutional perspectives that have been put forward to explain the emergence of sustainability standards – the economic, idealist and political-institutional perspectives – to analyze the phenomenon of standard multiplicity. Each perspective reflects a different kind of action logic and is simultaneously present and accessible to various parties involved. Based on a cross-sector analysis of standards multiplicity in the forestry, coffee and textile sectors, this article seeks to make two contributions. First, whereas these three perspectives have been presented as competing, we propose that they are complementary in offering partial explanations for different episodes in the dynamics underlying standards multiplicity in different sectors. Second, whereas most studies have analyzed standard setting in single sectors and thus have understood it as being an intra-sector phenomenon, our cross-sector analysis of the dynamics of standard setting suggests that it is propelled by both sector-specific contingencies and experiences as well as by the experiences from other sectors.

Type
Symposium on ‘Multiplicity and Plurality in the World of Standards’, Guest Editors: Frank den Hond and Marie-Laure Djelic
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 151 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2014 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoudji, Augustin K.N., Adégbidi, Anselme, Agbo, Valentin, Atindogbé, Gilbert, Toyi, Mireille S.S., Yêvidé, Armand S.I., Ganglo, Jean C., and Lebailly, Philippe. 2012. “Functioning of Farm-Grown Timber Value Chains: Lessons from the Smallholder-Produced Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Poles Value Chain in Southern Benin.” Forest Policy and Economics 15: 98–107.Google Scholar
Auld, Graeme and Cashore, Benjamin. 2012. “The Forest Stewardship Council.” In Business Regulation and Non-State Actors: Whose Standards? Whose development?, edited by Utting, Peter, Reed, Darryl and Reed, Ananya, 134–147. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auld, Graeme, Gulbrandsen, Lars H., and McDermott, Constance L. 2008. “Certification Schemes and the Impacts on Forests and Forestry.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 187–211.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297–351.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2011. “Certification as a Mode of Social Regulation.” In Handbook of the Politics of Regulation, edited by Levi-Faur, David, 441–452. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Cashore, Benjamin. 2007. “Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework.” Regulation and Governance 1 (4): 347–371.Google Scholar
Brunsson, Nils, Rasche, Andreas, and Seidl, David. 2012. “The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 33 (5/6): 613–632.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance.” Governance-An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15 (4): 503–529.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Graeme, and Newsom, Deanne. 2003. “Forest Certification (Eco-labeling) Programs and their Policy-Making Authority: Explaining Divergence among North American and European Case Studies.” Journal of Forest Policy and Economics 5 (3): 225–247.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Graeme, and Newsom, Deanne. 2004. “The United States’ Race to Certify Sustainable Forestry: Non-State Environmental Governance and the Competition for Policy-Making Authority.” Business and Politics 5 (3): 219–259.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Graeme, Lawson, James, and Newsom, Deanna. 2007a. “The Future of Non-State Authority on Canadian Staples Industries: Assessing the Emergence of Forest Certification.” Policy and Society 26 (1): 71–91.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Graeme, Bernstein, Steven, and McDermott, Constance. 2007b. “Can Non-State Governance ‘Ratchet Up’ Global Environmental Standards? Lessons from the Forest Sector.” Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 16 (2): 158–172.Google Scholar
Conroy, Michael E. 2007. Branded! How the “Certification Revolution” Is Transforming Global Corporations. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
den Hond, Frank, Frank, G. de Bakker, A., Neergaard, Peter, and Gond, Jean-Pascal. 2007. “Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action: Reconciling Rhetorical Harmony and Practical Dissonance.” In Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action: Talking, Doing and Measuring, edited by den Hond, Frank, Frank, G. de Bakker, A. and Neergaard, Peter, 205–226. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, Klaus and Pattberg, Philipp. 2009. “World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (4): 707–743.Google Scholar
Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie. 2013. “A Market Mediation Strategy: How Social Movements Seek to Change Firms’ Practices by Promoting New Principles of Product Valuation.” Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 683–703.Google Scholar
Espinoza, Omar, Buehlmann, Urs, and Smith, Bob. 2012. “Forest Certification and Green Building Standards: Overview and Use in the U.S. Hardwood Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 33: 30–41.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. “Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 – main report.” FAO Forestry Paper No. 163.Google Scholar
Fransen, Luc W. 2010. Minding Their Own Business? Firms and Activists in the Making of Private Labour Regulation. Amsterdam, NL: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fransen, Luc W. 2011. “Why Do Private Governance Organizations Not Converge? A Political-Institutional Analysis of Transnational Labor Standards Regulation.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24 (2): 359–387.Google Scholar
Fransen, Luc W. 2012. “Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Voluntary Programme Interactions: Legitimation Politics in the Institutional Design of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Socio-Economic Review 10 (1): 163–192.Google Scholar
Gendron, Corinne, Bisaillon, Véronique, and Isabel Otero Rance, Ana. 2009. “The Institutionalization of Fair Trade: More than Just a Degraded Form of Social Action.” Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1): 63–79.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Dirk U., Rasche, Andreas, and Waddock, Sandra. 2011. “Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards.” Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1): 23–44.Google Scholar
Haack, Patrick, Schoeneborn, Dennis, and Wickert, Christopher. 2012. “Talking the Talk, Moral Entrapment, Creeping Commitment? Exploring Narrative Dynamics in Corporate Responsibility Standardization.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 815–845.Google Scholar
Hassel, Anke. 2008. “The Evolution of a Global Labor Governance Regime.” Governance 21 (2): 231–251.Google Scholar
Jamali, Dima. 2010. “MNCs and International Accountability Standards through an Institutional Lens: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling.” Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4): 617–640.Google Scholar
King, Andrew A. and Lenox, Michael J. 2000. “Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 698–716.Google Scholar
Low, William and Davenport, Eileen. 2005. “Postcards from the Edge: Maintaining the ‘Alternative’ Character of Fair Trade.” Sustainable Development 13 (3): 143–153.Google Scholar
Manning, Stephan, Boons, Frank, von Hagen, Olivier, and Reinecke, Juliane. 2012. “National Contexts Matter: The Co-Evolution of Sustainability Standards in Global Value Chains.” Ecological Economics 83: 197–209.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.Google Scholar
McCaffrey, Sarah and Kurland, Nancy. 2013. “Who Defines ‘Local’? Resistance to Harmonizing Standards in Ethical Markets.” Business and Politics 16 (1): 191–219.Google Scholar
Meidinger, Errol. 2006. “The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry.” European Journal of International Law 17 (1): 47–87.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. 2010. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor”. Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Micheletti, Michele. 2003. Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Shopping and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mueller, Martin, Gomes dos Santos, Virginia, and Seuring, Stefan. 2009. “The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance.” Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4): 509–523.Google Scholar
Mutersbaugh, Tad. 2005. “Fighting Standards with Standards: Harmonization, Rents, and Social Accountability in Certified Agrofood Networks.” Environment and Planning A 37 (11): 2033–2051.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2000 [1965]. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Dara. 2004. Community-Driven Regulation: Balancing Development and the Environment in Vietnam. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Overdevest, Christine. 2010. “Comparing Forest Certification Schemes: The Case of Ratcheting Standards in the Forest Sector.” Socio-Economic Review 8 (1): 47–76.Google Scholar
Petkova, Iva. 2006. “Shifting Regimes of Governance in the Coffee Market: From Secular Crisis to a New Equilibrium?” Review of International Political Economy 13 (2): 313–339.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem and Potoski, Matthew. 2007. “Collective Action through Voluntary Environmental Programs: A Club Theory Perspective.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (4): 773–792.Google Scholar
Rasche, Andreas and Kell, Georg. eds. 2010. The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, Trends and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reinecke, Juliane, Manning, Stephan, and Hagen, Olivier Von. 2012. “The Emergence of a Standards Markets: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry.” Organization Studies 33 (5/6): 791–814.Google Scholar
Sasser, Erika N., Prakash, Aseem, Cashore, Benjamin, and Auld, Graeme. 2006. “Direct Targeting as an NGO Political Strategy: Examining Private Authority Regimes in the Forestry Sector.” Business and Politics 8 (3): 1–32.Google Scholar
Schepers, Donald H. 2010. “Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council.” Journal of Business Ethics 92: 279–290.Google Scholar
Scherer, Andreas Georg and Palazzo, Guido. 2007. “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society seen from a Habermasian Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1069–1120.Google Scholar
Schurman, Rachel. 2004. “Fighting ‘Frankenfoods’: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe.” Social Problems 51 (2): 243–268.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul F. 1949. “The Tree Farm Movement: Its Origin and Development.” Agricultural History 23: 41–45.Google Scholar
Sikavica, Katarina and Pozner, Jo-Ellen. 2013. “Paradise Sold: Resource Partitioning and the Organic Movement in the US Farming Industry.” Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 623–651.Google Scholar
Tamm Hallström, Kristina and Magnus Boström. 2010. Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization. Organizing Fragile Non-State Authority. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Turcotte, Marie-France, de Bellefeuille, Stéphane, and den Hond, Frank. 2007. “Gildan Inc.: Influencing Corporate Governance in the Textile Sector.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 27: 23–36.Google Scholar
Tysiachniouk, Maria. 2013. “Fostering Transparency in the Transnational Supply Chain: From Russian Forest Producers to Consumers in Europe and the USA.” Forest Policy and Economics 31 (June): 3–11.Google Scholar
Utting, Peter. 2001. Regulating Business via Multi-Stakeholders Initiatives: A Preliminary Assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2008. “Private Global Business Regulation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, Glen, Frank, G. de Bakker, A., den Hond, Frank, and Muthuri, Judy. 2013. “Situated Interests: Managing Conflict In and Around Multi-stakeholder Initiatives.” Working Paper. Nottingham: University of Nottingham ICCSR.Google Scholar