Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:05:02.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engineering Uncontestedness? The Origins and Institutional Development of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tim Büthe
Tim Büthe*
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Private regulation often entails competition among multiple rule-makers, but private rules and regulators do not always compete. For substantial parts of the global economy, a single private body (per issue) is recognized as the focal point for global rule-making. The selection of the institutional setting here effectively takes place prior to drawing up the specific rules, with important consequences for the politics of regulating global markets. In this paper, I develop a theoretical explanation for how a private transnational organization may attain such preeminence—how it can become the focal point for rule-making—in its area of expertise. I emphasize the transnational body's capacity to pursue its organizational self-interest, as well as timing and sequence. I then examine empirically a particularly important body of this kind, which today is essentially uncontested as the focal point for private regulation in its area, even though its standards often have substantial distributive implications: the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). I analyze the persistence and changes in the IEC's formal rules or procedures and informal norms, as well as the broadening scope of its regulatory authority and membership over more than a century.

Keywords

regulationprivate governancetechnologyinstitutional development
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , October 2010 , pp. 1 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2010 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Walter, and Brock, James W. 1982. “Integrated Monopoly and Market Power: System Selling, Compatibility Standards, and Market Control.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 22 (4): 29–42.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphi, Hendrik, and Kleinemeyer, Jens. 1998. “International Standardization: History and Organizations.” In An Introduction to Standards and Standardization, edited by Hesser, Wilfried and Inklaar, Alex. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 252–281 Google Scholar
Ahearn, Raymond J. 2008. Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Background and Analysis (CRS Report for Congress). Washington: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, Cyril. 1964. “Standardization Abroad.” Magazine of Standards 35 (12): 364–367.Google Scholar
ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 2010. Overview of the U.S. Standardization System. 3rd edition. Washington: ANSI.Google Scholar
Appleyard, Rollo. 1939. The History of the Institutions of Electrical Engineers, 1871-1931. London: IEE.Google Scholar
Auld, Graeme. 2009. Reversal of Fortune: How Early Choices Can Alter the Logic of Market-Based Authority, Ph.D. dissertations, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Auld, Graeme, Bernstein, Steven, and Cashore, Benjamin. 2008. “The New Corporate Social Responsibility.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Marc, and Milner, Helen. 2001. “Strategies of European Standardization.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, Sell, and Susan K. 2010. “Who Governs the Globe?” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. New York: University Press, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balleisen, Edward J. 2010. “The Prospects for Effective Coregulation in the United States: A Historian's View from the Early Twenty-First Century.” In Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, edited by Balleisen, Edward J. and Moss, David A. New York: Cambridge University Press, 443–481.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 2001. “Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10 (1): 7–45.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 2003. “Private Politics.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 12 (1): 31–66.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2010. “Transnational Private Regulation in Practice: The Limits of Forest and Labor Standards Certification in Indonesia.” Business and Politics 12 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergholz, Werner, Weiss, Bettina, and Lee, Carlos. 2006. “Benefits of Standardization in the Microelectronics Industries and their Implications for Nanotechnology and other Innovative Industries.” In International Standardization as a Strategic Tool. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 37–50.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, and Cashore, Benjamin. 2007. “Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework.” Regulation and Governance 1 (4): 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besen, Stanley, and Farrell, Joseph. 1994. “Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2): 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blind, Knut. 2004. The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blind, Knut, et al. 2000. “Volkswirtschaftlicher Nutzen.” In Gesamtwirtschaftlicher Nutzen der Normung, Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse: Wissenschaftlicher Endbericht mit Praktischen Beispielen, edited by DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) et al. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 23–34.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2010. Globalizing the Right Wing: Conservative Activism and World Politics. Unpublished manuscript, under contract with Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradford, Scott. 2003. “Paying the Price: Final Goods Protection in OECD Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1): 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brearly, Harry Chase. 1923. A Symbol of Safety: An Interpretative Study of a Notable Institution Organized for Service—Not Profit. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co.Google Scholar
Brint, Steven. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, Nils, and Jacobsson, Bengt. 2000a. “The Contemporary Expansion of Standardization.” In A World of Standards, edited by Brunsson, Nils and Jacobsson, Bengt. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–17 Google Scholar
Brunsson, Nils, and Jacobsson, Bengt. eds. 2000b. A World of Standards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2006. Enabling Lighter Touch Regulation: The Role of Standards. London: BSI.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O. 2006. “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.” Ethics & International Affairs 20 (4): 405–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2002. “Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2007. “The Politics of Competition and Institutional Change in the European Union: The First Fifty Years.” In Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty (State of the European Union, vol.8), edited by Meunier, Sophie and McNamara, Kathleen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–193.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2008. “The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS-Agreement of 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71 (1): 219–255.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2009. “The Politics of Food Safety in the Age of Global Trade: The Codex Alimentarius Commission in the SPS-Agreement of the WTO.” In Import Safety: Regulatory Governance in the Global Economy, edited by Coglianese, Cary, Finkel, Adam and Zaring, David. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 88–109.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010a. “The Dynamics of Principals and Agents: Institutional Persistence and Change in U.S. Financial Regulation, 1934-2003.” unpublished manuscript, Duke University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010b. “The Power of Norms; the Norms of Power: Who Governs International Electrical and Electronic Technology?” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. New York: University Press, 292–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010c. “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review.” Business and Politics 12 (3).Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter. 2010. “Standards for Global Markets: Domestic and International Institutions for Setting International Product Standards.” In Handbook on Multi-Level Governance, edited by Enderlein, Henrik, Wälti, Sonja and Zürn, Michael. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 455–476.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter. 2011. New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim, and Witte, Jan Martin. 2004. Product Standards in Transatlantic Trade and Investment: Domestic and International Practices and Institutions. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio. 2009. “Private Regulation in European Private Law.” EUI Law Working Papers no.2009/31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio, and Janczuk, Agnieszka. 2010. “Private Regulation and European Legal Integration.” Business and Politics 12 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahan, David. 1989. An Institute for an Empire: The Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871-1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cahan, David. 2010. “Helmholtz in Gilded-Age America: The International Electrical Congress of 1893 and the Relations of Science and Technology.” Annals of Science 67 (1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camfferman, Kees, and Zeff, Stephen A. 2007. Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets: A History of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973-2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority.” Governance 15 (4): 503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Graeme, and Newsom, Deanna. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Casper, Steven, and Hancké, Bob. 1999. “Global Quality Norms within National Production Regimes: ISO 9000 Standards in the French and German Car Industries.” Organization Studies vol. 20 no.6 (November 1999): 961–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The Innovators’ Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Condit, K. H. 1928. “The Economic Aspects of Standardization.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 137 (May): 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Rhonda J. 1979. The Politics of International Standards: France and the Color TV War. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publications.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2, Paper and Proceedings): 332–337.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and Greenstein, Shane. 1990. “Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1 (1&2): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Henk J. 2006. “Standards for Business: How Companies Benefit from Participation in International Standards Setting.” In International Standardization as a Strategic Tool. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 131–141.Google Scholar
Dicken, Peter. 2003. Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century. 4th edition. London—Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Egan, Michelle. 2001. Constructing a European Market: Standards, Regulation, and Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egyedi, Tineke M. 2000. “The Standardised Container: Gateway Technologies in Cargo Transport.” Homo Oeconomicus 17 (3, Euras Yearbook of Standardization vol.3): 231–262.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Sean D. 2010. “The Fair Trade Challenge to Embedded Liberalism.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electroindustry Magazine Editorial Staff. 2001. “Interview with Ed Yandek, Manager of Worldwide Industry Standards for General Electric Lighting” electroindustry 6 (2).Google Scholar
Erdmann, Jeanne. 2009. The Appointment of a Representative Commission. Available from www.iec.ch/about/history/articles/appointment_commission.htm (last accessed 5 May 2009).Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy and Sauder, Michael. 2010. “Unintentional Regulation: How Measures Can Become Disciplinary.” Paper presented at the Conference on Indicators as a Technology of Governance, NYU School of Law, 13-14 September 2010.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9): 1143–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L. 2010. “Making International Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Relations.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Joseph, and Saloner, Garth. 1986. “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation.” American Economic Review 76 (5): 940–955.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1992. Science, the State, and International Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. 2011. “Historical Institutionalism in International Relations.” International Organization (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 2009. “Organizations: Theoretical Debates and the Scope of Organization Theory.” UC Berkeley Center for Culture, Organizations, and Politics Working Paper.Google Scholar
Funk, Jeffrey L. 2002. Global Competition Between and Within Standards: The Case of Mobile Phones. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, H. Landis, ed. 1991. Competitive Strategies for Product Standards: The Strategic Use of Compatibility Standards for Competitive Advantage. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gandal, Neil. 2001. “Quantifying the Trade Impact of Compatibility Standards and Barriers: An Industrial Organization Perspective.” In Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: Can It Be Done?, edited by Maskus, Keith E. and Wilson, John S. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 137–153.Google Scholar
Gerlach, Horst. 2007. “Turbo des weltweiten Handels: Für den Abbau von Markzugangshürden.” Wissenschaftsmanagement: Zeitschrift für Innovation 2/2007 (Special: Normen als Instrumente des Technologietransfers): 13.Google Scholar
Gesmer and Updegrove, LLP. 2010. Standard Setting Organizations and Standards List, http://www.consortiuminfo.org/links (last accessed 8/10/2010).Google Scholar
Gispen, Kees. 1990. “Engineers in Wilhelmian Germany: Professionalization, Deprofessionalization, and the Development of Nonacademic Technical Education.” In German Professions, 1800-1950, edited by Cocks, Geoffrey and Jarausch, Konrad H. New York: Oxford University Press, 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Kim, Soo Yeon. 2005. “An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of the GATT on Trade, 1950-1994.” World Politics 57 (4): 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2010. “Private Standards in the Climate Regime: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol.” Business and Politics 12 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. (First published 1962.) Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2005. “Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streek, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. New York: Oxford University Press, 40–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, David. 2005. CE Marking, Product Standards and World Trade. Cheltenham (England)–Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlein, Rick, O'Neill, Anne, Kojima, T., Stubbe, R. Daly, J., and Kelly, M.H. “Internationalization of Cable Standards: An Overview of the Variety of Methods and Motivations of Standards Developing Organizations around the World.” IEEE Power Engineering Review 17 (11): 19–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren G., et al., eds. 2006a. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, et al. 2006b. “Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations, and Principal-Agent Theory.” In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrigel, Gary. 1996. Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, James. 2002. “Technical Standards and the Integration of the U.S. and Canadian Economies.” American Review of Canadian Studies 32 (1): 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummels, David. 1999. Have International Transport Costs Declined? Unpublished Manuscript, University of Chicago, November 1999.Google Scholar
Hummels, David. 2007. “Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (3): 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianoz, Michel, Kunz, Heinrich, and Moehr, Diethart. 2002. “Standardization Activities in the Field of EMC.” In Proceedings from the 3rd International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 21-24 May 2002, edited by Zhang, Linchang and Wen, Yinghong. Beijing: Peoples Posts and Telecommunications Publishing House with IEEE Press, 23–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEC. 1906. Report of Preliminary Meeting. London: International Elecrotechnical Commission.Google Scholar
IEC. 2005. IEC Statutes and Rules of Procedure (2001 edition, as amended on 2004-01-02, 2005-01-07 and 2005-09-02, endorsed by the National Committees). Geneva: IEC.Google Scholar
IEC. 2010a. The IEC in Figures, at http://www.iec.ch/news_centre/iec_figures/ (last accessed 8 August 2010).Google Scholar
IEC. 2010b. IEC TC111: Environmental Standardization for Electrical and Electronic Products and Systems, http://www.iec.ch/dyn/www/f?p=102:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:1314 (last accessed 8 August 2010).Google Scholar
IEC. 2010c. International and Regional Partners, http://www.iec.ch/about/partners/ (last accessed 10 August 2010).Google Scholar
IEC. 2010d. Organizations and TC/SC Liaisons, http://www.iec.ch/about/organe.htm (last accessed 10 August 2010).Google Scholar
ISO/IEC. 1996. Standardization and Related Activities: General Vocabulary. 7th edition. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC. 2007. Using and Referencing ISO and IEC Standards for Technical Regulations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC. 2009. ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1: Procedures for the Technical Work. 7th edition. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission.Google Scholar
Jaffee, Daniel. 2007. Brewing Justice: Fair Trade Coffee, Sustainability, and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad H. 1990. The Unfree Professions: German Lawyers, Teachers, and Engineers, 1900-1950. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Tana L. 2010. Rethinking Non-State Actors: The Role and Impact of International Bureaucrats in Institutional Design. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Jungmittag, Andre, Blind, Knut, and Grupp, Hariolf. 1999. “Innovation, Standardisation, and the Long-Term Production Function: A Cointegration Analysis for Germany 1960-1996“ Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 119: 205–222.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, and Snidal, Duncan. 2006. “The Choice of International Institutions: Cooperation, Alternatives and Strategies.” unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado and University of Chicago (July 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamoto, Akira, et al. 1997. “Product Standards, Conformity Assessment and Regulatory Reform.” In OECD Report on Regulatory Reform, edited by Organization for Economic Coopertion and Development OECD. Paris: OECD, 1997: 275-.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Scott, Suttmeier, Richard P., and Su, Jun. 2008. Standards, Stakeholders, and Innovation: China's Evolving Role in the Global Knowledge Economy. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kirton, John J., and Trebilcock, Michael J., eds. 2004. Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Klein, Daniel B. 1997. “Trust for Hire: Voluntary Remedies for Quality and Safety.” In Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct, edited by Klein, Daniel B. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 97–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Kelly, and Prakash, Aseem. 2001. “Green By Choice? Cross-National Variations in Firms’ Responses to EMS-Based Environmental Regimes.” World Politics 53 (3): 399–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan, eds. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. (First published as a special issue of International Organization 55 (4). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 43 (3): 336–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2006. “On Legitimacy.” International Relations 20 (3): 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krislov, Samuel. 1997. How Nations Choose Product Standards and Standards Change Nations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Lagerstrom, Larry Randles. 1992. Constructing Uniformity: The Standardization of International Electromagnetic Measures, 1860-1912, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, Claire. 2007. “The Costs of Cooperation: Civilian Casualty Counts in Iraq.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (4): 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret, and Linton, April. 2003. “Fair Trade: A Cup at a Time?” Politics & Society 31 (3): 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loya, Thomas, and Boli, John. 1999. “Standardization in the World Polity: Technical Rationality over Power.” In Constructing World Culture: International Non-Governmental Organizations since 1875, edited by Boli, John and Thomas, George. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 169–197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A Radical View, Studies in Sociology. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–37 Google Scholar
Mallett, Robert L. 1998-99. “Why Standards Matter.” Issues in Science and Technology 15 (2) 63–66.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, and Trachtman, Joel P. 2002. “TBT, SPS, and GATT: A Map of the WTO Law of Domestic Regulation.” Journal of World Trade 36 (5): 811–881.Google Scholar
Maréchal, Roger. 1997. “The Early Years.” In Friendship Among Equals: Recollections from ISO's First Fifty Years, edited by Latimer, Jack. Geneva: ISO Central Secretariat, 23–31.Google Scholar
Markovits, Andrei S., and Deutsch, Karl W., eds. 1980. Fear of Science—Trust in Science: Conditions for Change in the Climate of Opinion. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain with Verlag Anton Hain, Königstein, Germany.Google Scholar
Martinez-Diaz, Leonardo. 2005. “Strategic Experts and Improvising Regulators: Explaining the IASC's Rise to Global Influence 1973-2001.” Business and Politics 7 (3), Article 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskus, Keith E., Otsuki, Tsunehiro, Wilson, and John S. 2005. “The Cost of Compliance with Product Standards for Firms in Developing Countries: An Econometric Study.” World Bank Policy Research Paper no.3590 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Ruth E. 1954. “Standards Urged to Help European Economy.” Magazine of Standards 25 (5): 143–144.Google Scholar
Mathiason, John. 2007. Invisible Governance: International Secretariats in Global Politics. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter. 2003. “Public and Private Governance in Setting International Standards.” In Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, edited by Kahler, Miles and Lake, David A. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 197–229.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2003. “Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?” World Politics 56 (1): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2005. “Global Private Governance: Lessons From a National Model of Setting Standards in Accounting.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3/4): 225–262.Google Scholar
McDermott, Constance L., Noah, Emily, and Cashore, Benjamin. 2008. “Differences That ‘Matter’? A Framework for Comparing Environmental Certification Standards and Government Policies.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 10 (1): 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, A. Michal. 1984. The Making of a Profession: A Century of Electrical Engineering in America. New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, Tom. 2006. AC/DC: The Savage Tale of the First Standards War. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mechanical Engineering staff writers. 1924. “Scientific Events: The World Power Conference.” Science 60 (1550, 12 September 1924): 237–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, Errol. 2006. “The Administrative Law of Global Public-Private Regulation: The Case of Forestry.” European Journal of International Law 17 (1): 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W. 1980. “The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation-State.” In Studies of the Modern World-System, edited by Bergesen, Albert. New York: Academic Press, 109–137.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1989 (1915). Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie: Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens. 4th edition, with an introduction by Pfetsch, Frank R. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moenius, Johannes. 2006. “Do National Standards Hinder or Promote Trade in Electrical Products?” In International Standardization as a Strategic Tool. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 53–68.Google Scholar
Mold, Andrew. 2005. “Non-Tariff Barriers: Their Prevalence and Relevance for African Countries.” UN Economic Commission for Africa Work in Progress Paper Series no.25.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution versus Information.” International Organization 48 (3): 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2011. Labor Rights and Multinational Production. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig N., and Yates, JoAnne. 2008. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus. London–New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murphy, Dale D. 2004. The Structure of Regulatory Competition: Corporations and Public Policies in a Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mustonen, Mikko. 2000. “Strategic R&D Investment in Future Compatibility.” Homo Oeconomicus 17 (3, Euras Yearbook of Standardization vol.3): 303–315.Google Scholar
N, N. 1921. International Conference on Large Electric Systems: Proceedings. Paris: The Conference.Google Scholar
Onken, William H. Jr. 1919. “Work of the International Electrotechnical Commission” Electrical World 73 (17, 26 April 1919): 856–857.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Williamson, Jeffrey G. 1999. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OTA, Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States. 1992. Global Standards: Building Blocks for the Future. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Paxton, Earl B. 1954. “AIEE: A Leader in Electrical Standards.” Magazine of Standards 25 (8): 242–245.Google Scholar
Perry, James, and Nölke, Andreas. 2005. “International Accounting Standards Setting: A Network Approach.” Business and Politics 7 (3): Art.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes.” Studies in American Political Development 14 (1): 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency and Agenda-Setting in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A., and Shaffer, Gregory C. 2009. When Cooperation Fails: The Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A., and Shaffer, Gregory C. eds. 2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Porter, Tony. 2003. “Technical Collaboration and Political Conflict in the Emerging Regime for International Financial Regulation.” Review of International Political Economy 10 (3): 520–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Elliot. 2010. “Sequence as Causes: The International Politics of Accounting Standards.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Potoski, Matthew. 2006. The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Potoski, Matthew. 2010. “The International Organization for Standardization as a Global Governor: A Club Theory Perspective.” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. New York: University Press, 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Leslie D. 1972. “The Benefit of Standardization to Industry.” In Speaking of Standards, edited by Glie, Rowen. Boston: Cahner Books, 169–178.Google Scholar
Raeburn, Anthony. 2006a. IEC Technical Committee Creation: The First Half-Century (1906-1949), http://www.iec.ch/about/history/overview/overview_1906-1949.htm (last accessed 8 August 2010).Google Scholar
Raeburn, Anthony. 2006b. Development and Growth of IEC Technical Committees: 1950 to 2006, http://www.iec.ch/about/history/overview/overview_1950-2006.htm (last accessed 8 August 2010).Google Scholar
Raynolds, Laura T., Murray, Douglas L., and Wilkinson, John, eds. 2007. Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization. London–New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reader, William J. 1987. A History of the Instituiton of Electrical Engineers, 1871-1971. London: Peter Peregrinus.Google Scholar
Rege, Vinod, Gujadhur, Shyam K., and Franz, Roswitha. 2003. Influencing and Meeting International Standards: Challenges for Developing Countries. Geneva/London: UNCTAD/WTO International Trade Center and Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
Renckens, Stefan. 2010. “The Emergence of Competing Certification Standards in the Electronics Recycling Industry.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2005. “Global Governance and Communicative Action.” In Global Governance and Public Accountability, edited by Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 164–189.Google Scholar
Robb, H. W. 1956. “Significance of Company and National Standards to Industrial Management.” In National Standards in a Modern Economy, edited by Reck, Dickson. New York: Harper & Brothers, 295–302.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1998. Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Andrew. 2004. “Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?” American Economic Review 94 (1): 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors, and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppert, Louis. 1956. Brief History of the International Electrotechnical Commission. Geneva: Bureau Central de la Commission Electrotechnique Internationale.Google Scholar
Russell, Andrew L. 2005. “Standardization in History: A Review Essay with an Eye to the Future.” In The Standards Edge: Future Generations, edited by Bolin, Sherrie. Ann Arbor, MI: Sheridan Press, 247–260.Google Scholar
Russell, Andrew L. 2007. Industrial Legislatures: Consensus Standardization in the Second and Third Industrial Revolutions. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History, Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Schaap, Arjan, and de Vries, Henk. 2005. Wat levert normalisatie u op? Delft: NEN.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schofer, Evan. 1999. “Science Associations in the International Sphere, 1875-1990: The Rationalization of Science and the Scientization of Society.” In Constructing World Culture: International Non-Governmental Organizations since 1875, edited by Boli, John and Thomas, George. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 249–266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciulli, David. 2005. “Continental Sociology of Professions Today: Conceptual Contributions.” Current Sociology 53 (6): 915–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 2008. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A. 2010. “How Hard and Soft Law Interact in International Regulatory Governance: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists.” In Systemic Implications of Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation and Competition, edited by Evenett, Simon J. and Stern, Robert M. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 2001. “Setting Compatibility Standards: Cooperation or Collusion?” In Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society, edited by Cooper Dreyfuss, Rochelle, Lehnheer Zimmerman, Diane and First, Harry. New York: Oxford University Press, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Carl, and Varian, Hal R. 1999. “The Art of Standards Wars.” California Management Review 41 (2): 8–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillcox, Lewis K. 1954. “ASME's Interest in International Codes.” Magazine of Standards 25 (8): 254–25.Google Scholar
Simcoe, Timothy S., and Rysman, Marc. 2006. “Measuring the Performance of Standard Setting Organizations.” In International Standardization as a Strategic Tool. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 81–93.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1987. “Satisficing.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, edited by Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter: Macmillan Press, 243–245.Google Scholar
Skinner, C. E. 1928. “The Present Status of Standards in the Electrical Industry.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 137 (May): 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “Coordination versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes.” American Political Science Review 79 (4): 923–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobin, Shana, and Weinthal, Erika. 2010. “Third Party Certification as Private Regulation.” Business and Politics 12 (3).Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO.” International Organization 56 (2): 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Sherry M. 1997. “Standards, Conformity Assessment and Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 1826.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, James. 2002. “Turn of the Century.” Wired 10 (1): 84–89.Google Scholar
Swann, G. M. Peter. 2005. “Do Standards Enable or Constrain Innovation?” In The Empirical Economics of Standards, edited by Temple, Paul. London: Department of Trade and Industry, 76–120.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan. 1995. Product Standards for Internationally Integrated Goods Markets. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Tamm Hallström, Kristina. 2004. Organizing International Standardization: ISO and the IASC in Quest of Authority. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teichmann, Hans. 2001. 1901-2001: Celebrating the Centenary of SI – Giovanni Giorgi's Contribution and the Role of the IEC. Geneva: IEC.Google Scholar
Teichmann, Hans. 2003. “Efficiency of IEC Technical Committee Secretariats.” Homo Oeconomicus 20 (1, EURAS Yearbook of Standardization, vol.4): 125–145.Google Scholar
Teichmann, Hans, and de Vries, Henk J. 2009. “Language Selection Policies in International Standardization: Perception of the IEC Member Countries.” ERIM Report Series no.ERS-2009-031-LIS. Available at SSRN.Google Scholar
Temple, Paul, Witt, Robert, and Spencer, Chris. 2005. “Standards and Long-Run Growth in the UK.” In The Empirical Economics of Standards, edited by Temple, Paul. London: Department of Trade and Industry, 39–60.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science vol.2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Comparative-Historical Analysis: Innovations in Theory and Methods, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–240 Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Steinmo, Sven. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen and Longstreth, Frank. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–32.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Goldstein, Judith L., and Rivers, Douglas. 2007. “Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade? Comment.” American Economic Review 97 (5): 2005–2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Töpfer, Armin, et al. 2000. “Unternehmerischer Nutzen.” In Gesamtwirtschaftlicher Nutzen der Normung, Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse: Wissenschaftlicher Endbericht mit Praktischen Beispielen, edited by DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) et al. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 23-34.Google Scholar
U S. National Committee of the IEC. 1964. “Electrical Industry Benefits from IEC Participation: Technical Advisors to the United States National Committee of the International Electrotechnical Commission Report on the Speicific Benefits of Participation in IEC Technical Work.” Magazine of Standards 35 (9): 265–268.Google Scholar
Véron, Nicolas. 2007. The Global Accounting Experiment. Brussels: Bruegel.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2008. “Private Global Business Regulation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 2011. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in the United States and Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Warburg, E. 1916. “Werner Siemens und die Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt.” Naturwissenschaften 4 (50): 793–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1972 (1921/22). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Fifth revised and extended edition; Winckelmann, Johannes, ed. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Werle, Raymund, and Iversen, Eric J. 2006. “Promoting Legitimacy in Technical Standardization.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 2 (1): 19–39.Google Scholar
Woerter, Everett. 1972. “Value of Properly Planned Standardization.” In Speaking of Standards, edited by Glie, Rowen. Boston: Cahner Books, 120–128.Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Organization. 1998. WTO Training Package: Module 3, Goods: Rules on NTMs. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Organization. 2005. World Trade Report 2005: Exploring the Links Between Trade, Standards, and the WTO. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
WTO, World Trade Organization. 2009. World Trade Report 2009: Trade Policy Commitments and Contingency Measures. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Yates, JoAnne, and Murphy, Craig N. 2006. “Coordinating International Standards: The Formation of the ISO.” unpublished manuscript, MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, JoAnne, and Murphy, Craig N. 2008. “Charles Le Maistre: Entrepreneur in International Standardization.” Entreprises et Histoire 51 (June): 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar