Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:05:22.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corporate Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Asia: A Conceptual Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vinod K. Aggarwal*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
Department of Political Science, 210 Barrows Hall #1950, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720–1950. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Despite recent currency crises, most of the Asia-Pacific economies continue to be among the most attractive markets in the world and now appear to be recovering rapidly. An important element in understanding the dynamics of firm strategies in Asia is the nature of nonmarket strategies, which concern efforts to respond to and influence the political-economic-social environment. To examine such nonmarket strategies and how they fit with other firm tasks, this article first focuses on “positional analysis”—that is, how market forces, firm competencies, and the nonmarket environment influence the choice of trade, investment, or some mix, at the national, regional, or global level. It then considers the nature of “strategic analysis,” consisting of a firm's choices of market arena, a transaction cost analysis of organization forms for market penetration, and a distributive politics analysis of nonmarket issues. These factors combine to influence the firm's integrated strategic choice. Implementation of this choice is based on “tactical analysis” that focuses on the market, organizational, and nonmarket tactics that firms must pursue to succeed with their chosen strategy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2001 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For comments on earlier versions of this article, I would like to thank David Baron, Cédric Dupont, Ralph Espach, Ed Fogarty, Justin Kolbeck, Kun-Chin Lin, Trevor Nakagawa, and John Ravenhill.

References

Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1992. “The Political Economy of Service Sector Negotiations in the Uruguay Round.” The Fletcher Forum Of World Affairs 16, 1 (Winter): 3554.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. (ed.) 1998. Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2000. “The Wobbly Triangle: Europe, Asia and the U.S. after the Asian Crisis.” In After the Asian Crises: Perspectives on Global Politics and Economics, edited by Weber, Maria. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K., Keohane, Robert, and Yoffie, David 1987. “The Dynamics of Negotiated Protectionism.” American Political Science Review 81, 2 (June): 345366.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Morrison, Charles, eds. 1998. Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Ravenhill, John. 2001. “Undermining the WTO: The Case Against ‘Open Sectoralism.”’ Asia Pacific Issues. 50 (February).Google Scholar
Bain, J. E. 1956. Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, David. 1999. “Integrated Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Client and Interest Group Politics.” Business and Politics 1 (1): 734.Google Scholar
Baron, David. 1999. 2000. Business and Its Environment, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics (October): 144 Google Scholar
D'Aveni, R. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Dupont, Cédric. 2001. “Euro-Pressure: Avenues and Strategies for Lobbying the European Union.” In Winning in Asia, European Style: Market and Nonmarket Strategies for Success, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1980. “Why Collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes.” World Politics 32 (3): 357405.Google Scholar
Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C. K. 1989. “Strategic Intent.” Harvard Business Review (May-June): 6376.Google Scholar
Hill, Charles and Jones, Gareth. 1995. Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Henisz, Witold Jerzy. 2000. “The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 16 (2): 334364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Benjamin and Leffler, Keith B. 1981. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 615641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1999. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth. 1979. “The Domain of Choice.” In Eagle Entangled: U.S. Foreign Policy in a Complex World, edited by Kenneth Oye, Robert Lieber, and Donald Rothschild. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, Gary. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review (May-June): 7991.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 2001. “Nonmarket Strategies in Asia: The Regional Level.” In Winning in Asia, European Style: Market and Nonmarket Strategies for Success, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 1980. “The Politics of Linkage.” World Politics 33 (1): 6281 Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar