Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:27:04.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SAP—A Globally Enterprising Company: European Lessons from the Enterprise Software Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Trevor H. Nakagawa
Trevor H. Nakagawa*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
Department of Political Science, 210 Barrows Hall, #1970, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720–1970. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Software has become one of the central drivers of growth in an expanding global economy. Despite concerted “catch-up” efforts by European and Asian firms and governments alike, few major software players are not American. In particular, European software producers were slow to adapt to the new challenges posed by U.S. firms with standardized software products tied to rapidly innovating computer hardware systems and the Internet. One exception is Germany's SAP, which has quietly managed to become one of the largest software companies in the world. This article examines the market and nonmarket factors that have led to this company's success in both the global and Asian context. First, it will examine how SAP was able to bring the first fully integrated package to corporations around the world and thus to establish a global presence in one of the largest software niche markets, enterprise resource planning software. Second, this study highlights the importance of taking the nonmarket environment into account in Asia. Finally, the article demonstrates how SAP's strategy in Asia was a part of its global plan to simultaneously maximize market share and improve efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 2001 , pp. 109 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2001 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2001. “Analyzing European Firms’ Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Asia.” In Winning in Asia, European Style, edited by Aggarwal, Vinod K. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Anderson, Erin and Gatignon, Hubert 1986. The Multinational Corporation's Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events.” Economic Journal v. 99, n. 394 (March, 1989): 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandinelli, Salvatore, Fuggera, A., Lavazza, L., Loi, M., Picco, and G. 1995. “Modeling and Improving an Industrial Software Process.” Software Engineering 21, 5 (May): 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, David P. 2000. Business and its Environment, 3rd Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Borrus, Michael and Zysman, John. 1997. “You Don't have to Be a Giant: How the Changing Terms of Competition in Global Markets Are Creating New Possibilities for Danish Companies.” BRIE Working Paper no. 96A. Berkeley: Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.Google Scholar
Borrus, Michael and Zysman, John. 1997. 1998. “Globalization with Borders: The Rise of Wintelism as the Future of Industrial Competition”. BRIE Working Paper no. 96B.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Timothy F. and Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1992. “General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth?” NBER Working Paper No. 4148. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business Software Alliance. 1998. World Software Piracy Report. Washington, DC: Business Software Alliances.Google Scholar
Business Software Alliance. 1999. World Software Piracy Report. Washington, DC: Business Software Alliances.Google Scholar
Business Software Alliance. 2000. World Software Piracy Report. Washington, DC: Business Software Alliances.Google Scholar
Cusumano, Michael A. and Yoffie, David B. 1998. Competing on Internet Time: Lessons From Netscape and its Battle With Microsoft. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
D'Aveni, Richard. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Management. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 1993. “Path-dependence and Predictability in Dynamic Systems with Local Network Externalities: A Paradigm for Historical Economics.” In Technology and the Wealth of Nations, edited by Foray, D. and Freeman, C. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. “CLIO and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review: 332–337.Google Scholar
Dedrick, Jason and Kramer, Kenneth. 1998. Asia's Computer Challenge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, Soumitra, Van Wassenhove, Luk N. and Kulandaiswamy, Selvan. 1998. “Benchmarking European software management practices.” Communications of the ACM 41, 6 (June): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESPRIT. 1997. “Software Best Practices (ESSI).” at www.cordis.lu/espirit/src/essi.htm.Google Scholar
Flamm, Kenneth. 1988. Creating the Computer. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gibbs, W.W. 1997. “Software's Chronic Crisis.” Scientific American (Int. Ed.) 271, 3 (August): 72–81.Google Scholar
Gomes-Casseres, B. 1992. “International Trade, Competition, and Alliances in the Computer Industry.” Working paper 92–044. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, Michael and Champy, James. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Hoch, Detlev J. et al. 2000. Secrets of Software Success. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
International Data Corporation (IDC). 1994. Packaged Software 1993.Google Scholar
International Data Corporation (IDC). 1997. Packaged Software Survey 1997.Google Scholar
International Data Corporation (IDC). 2000. Packaged Software 1999.Google Scholar
International Planning and Research Corporation (2000). 1999 Global Piracy Report. Washington, DC: Business Software Alliance and Software and Information Industry.Google Scholar
Joly, Herbert, Kluge, Jurgen and Stein, Lothar. 1994. “Europe's Structural Weakness.” The McKinsey Quarterly 1: 33–38.Google Scholar
Malerba, Franco and Salvatore Torrisi, Salvatore. 1996. “The Dynamics of Market Structure and Innovation in the Western European Software Industry.” In The International Computer Software Industry: A Comparative Study of Industry Evolution and Structure, edited by Mowery, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Katrina, Van Wassenhove, Luk, and Dutta, Soumitra. 1998. “Performance Evaluation of General and Company Specific Models in Software Development Effort Estimation.” Management Science 45(6): 787–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Gerd. 2000. SAP—The Secret Software Power. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.Google Scholar
Miles, Raymond and Snow, Charles. 1986. “Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms.” California Management Review 28 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, David. 1996. The International Computer Software Industry: A Comparative Study of Industry Evolution and Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1992. Keeping the U.S. Computer Industry Competitive. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 1985. The Software Industry. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. 1997. Information Technology. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ovum Consultancy. 1997. IT in the EU.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Saxenian, Annalee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, Charles, Lipnack, Jessica, and Stamps, Jeffrey. 1999. “The Virtual Organization: Promises and Payoffs, Large and Small.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 6: 15–30.Google Scholar
Steinmueller, W. Edmund. 1996. “The U.S. Software Industry: An Analysis and Interpretive History,” In The International Computer Software Industry: A Comparable Study of Industry Evolution and Structure, edited by Mowery, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teece, David and Grindley, Peter. 1997. “Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics.” California Management Review 39 (2): 8–41.Google Scholar
Torrisi, Salvatore. 1998. Industrial Organization and Innovation: An International Study of the Software Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1998. World Computer/IT Software/Services Best Markets Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Varian, Hal R. and Shapiro, Carl. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond. 1985. Exploring the Global Economy: Emerging Issues in Trade and Investment. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., Roos, Daniel, and Carpenter, Donna. 1990. The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar