Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:25:09.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and the Welfare State in Developing Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jungkeun Yoon
Jungkeun Yoon*
Affiliation:
Claremont Graduate University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most of the existing studies of the welfare state have dealt with OECD countries. Moreover, these studies have focused on government partisanship (left versus right), or institutional features under democracy, as primary causal variables. By providing four primary causal mechanisms (the power of popularly based parties, labor strength, democracy, and political instability) that are different from those of OECD countries, I answer the question of whether and why the efficiency or compensation hypothesis holds for developing countries. I show that either the efficiency or compensation thesis can hold for developing countries depending on the type of globalization with which popularly based governments interact.

Keywords

globalizationwelfare statedeveloping countries
Type
Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 1 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2009 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adsera, Alicia, and Boix, Carles. 2002. “Trade, Democracy, and the Size of Public Sector.” International Organization 56: 229–62.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, Jose A., Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avelino, George, Brown, David, and Hunter, Wendy. 2005. “The effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980-1999,” American Journal of Political Science 49: 625–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N. 1995. “What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 89: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Roberts Clark, William, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis,” Political Analysis 14: 63–82.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2004. “Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms.” International Organization 58: 807–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David, and Hunter, Wendy. 1999. “Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980-1992.” American Political Science Review 93: 779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy.” American Political Science Review 72: 1243–61.Google Scholar
Castles, G. Francis. 1982. The Impact of Parties. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip. 1995. “Globalization and the Changing Logic of Collective Action.” International Organization 49: 595–625.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1996. Globalizing Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feng, Yi. 1997. “Democracy, Political Instability, and Economic Growth.” British Journal of Political Science 27: 391–418.Google Scholar
Feng, Yi, and Gizelis, Theodora-Ismene. 2002. “Building Political Consensus and Distributing Resources: A Trade-Off or a Compatible Choice?” Economic Development and Cultural Change 51: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, Stephen. 1993. Organized Labor in the Asia-Pacific Region. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations,” American Journal of Political Science 26: 797–833.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. “Capital Mobility, Trade, and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy.” International Organization 49: 657–87.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Mitchell, Deborah. 2001. “Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD.” European Journal of Political Research 39: 145–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R. 1992. The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive conflicts, and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hecock, Douglas R, 2006. “Electoral Competition, Globalization, and Subnational Educational Spending in Mexico, 1999-2004,” American Journal of Political Science 50: 950–61.Google Scholar
Heredia, Blanca. 1997. “Prosper or Perish? Development in the Age of Global Capital.” Current History 96: 383–88.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Swank, Duane. 1992. “Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960-1982.” American Political Science Review 86: 658–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, Stephens, and John D. 1993. “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, and Constitutional Structure and the Welfare State.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 711–49.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Audrey, and Woods, Nancy. 1995. “Globalization and Inequality.” Journal of International Studies 24: 447–70.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Cusack, Thomas R. 2000. “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrilization and Globalization?” World Politics 52: 313–49.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, J. Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert, and Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2001. “Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973-1997.” World Politics 53: 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1978. The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism. Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
Kurzer, Paulette. 1993. Business and Banking: Political Change and Economic Integration in Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48: 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy 106: 997–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2002. “Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries.” International Organization 56: 411–45.Google Scholar
Rudra, Nita and Haggard, Stephan. 2005. “Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing world,” Comparative Political Studies 38: 1015–49.Google Scholar
Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2002. Globalization, Domestic Politics and the Welfare State in the Developing World: Latin America in Comparative Perspective, 1973-1997. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2005. “Democracy and Education Spending in Africa.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 343–58.Google Scholar
Stephen, D. John. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. Kennth. 2000. Competing for Capital: Europe and North America in a Global Era. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2006. “Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles, and Social Spending in the Developing World.” International Organization 60: 433–68.Google Scholar