Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:17:14.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic change and the supply of interest representation in the American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David Lowery ,
Virginia Gray  and
John Cluverius
Virginia Gray
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
John Cluverius
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine how economic change influences the supply of organized interests. Indeed, the economies of states have changed markedly since the turn of the century. State economies have grown, and the relative contributions of different economic sectors have changed. We use the Energy-Stability-Area model of interest system density to assess how these changes – along with changes in the productivity of different economic sectors in terms of generating organized interests – have influenced the size and composition of state interest communities from 1997 to 2007. We find that all three sources of economic change have uniquely contributed, and to a significant degree, to demographic change in state communities of organized interests.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 33 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Larsen-Price, H. A., Leech, B. L. and Rutledge, P. 2011. “Congressional and presidential effects on the demand for lobbying.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 3–16.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. 2011a. “Short-term volatility in the EU interest community.” Journal of European Public Policy. 18: 1–16.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. 2011b. “The changing demography of the EU interest system since 1990.” European Union Politics 11: 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dusso, A. 2010. “Legislation, political context, and interest group behavior.” Political Research Quarterly 63: 55–67.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. 1995. “The demography of interest organization communities: institutions, associations, and membership groups.” American Politics Quarterly 23: 3–32.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. 1996a. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. 1998. “State lobbying regulations and their enforcement: implications for the diversity of state interest communities.” State and Local Government Review 30: 78–91.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. 2001. “The institutionalization of state communities of organized intersts.” Political Research Quarterly 54: 265–284.Google Scholar
Gray, V., Lowery, D., Fellowes, M. and Anderson, J. 2005. “Understanding the demand-side of lobbying: interest system energy in the American States.” American Politics Research 33 (1): 404–434.Google Scholar
Gray, V., Lowery, D. and Godwin, E. 2007a. “Public preferences and organized interests in health policy: state pharmacy assistance programs as innovations.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 3: 89–129.Google Scholar
Gray, V., Lowery, D. and Godwin, E. 2007b. “The political management of managed care: explaining variations in state HMO regulations.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 32: 457–495.Google Scholar
Gray, V., Lowery, D., Godwin, E. K. and Monogan, J. 2010. “Incrementing toward nowhere: universal health care coverage in the states.” Publius 82–113.Google Scholar
Gray, V., Lowery, D., Cluvius, J. and Harden, J. J. 2011. Explaining the anomalous growth of public sector lobbying in the American States, 1997–2007. Paper was prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington, September.Google Scholar
Klarner, C. 2010. “Forecasting control of state governments and redistricting authority after the 2010 elections.” The Forum 8: Article 14.Google Scholar
Leech, B. L., Baumgartner, F. R., La Pira, T. and Semanko, N. A. 2005. “Drawing lobbyists to washington: government activity and the demand for advocacy.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 19–30.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. 2013. “Lobbying influence: meaning, measurement, and missing.” Interest Groups and Advocacy 2: 1–26.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. and Gray, V. 1998. “Representational concentration and interest community size: a population ecology interpretation.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 919–944.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. and Brasher, H. 2004. Organized Interests and American Government. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. and Gray, V. 1994. “Do lobbying regulations influence lobbying registrations.” Social Science Quarterly 75: 382–384.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. and Gray, V. 1995. “The population ecology of gucci gulch, or the natural regulation of interest group numbers in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 1–29.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. and Gray, V. 1997. “How some rules just don't matter: the regulation of lobbyists.” Public Choice 91: 139–147.Google Scholar
Lowery, D., Gray, V., Fellowes, M. and Anderson, J. 2004. “Living in the moment: lags, leads, and the link between legislative agendas and interest advocacy.” Social Science Quarterly 85: 463–477.Google Scholar
Lowery, D., Gray, V. and Fellowes, M. 2005. “Sisyphus meets the borg: economic scale and the inequalities in interest representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 17 (1): 41–74.Google Scholar
McChesney, F. S. 1997. Money for Nothing: Politicians, Rent Extraction, and Political Extortion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. E. 1979. Uphill and downhill battles and contributions to collective action. In: Russell, Clifford S. (eds.), Collective Decision-Making: Applications from Public Choice Theory. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 130–133.Google Scholar
Nownes, A. 2004. “The population ecology of interest group formation.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 49–67.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Toshkov, D., Lowery, D., Carroll, B. and Berkhout, J. 2011. Timing is Everything? Organized Interests and the Timing of Legislative Activity. Paper Presented at EUSA 12th Biennial Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, March 3–5, 2011.Google Scholar