Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:53:16.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A club theory approach to voluntary social programs: Multinational companies and the extractive industries transparency initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Douglas A. Schuler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study uses club theory to describe the incentives of extractive industry MNCs to support the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), a multi-stakeholder promoted voluntary social program (VSP) aimed at creating national legislation to make the royalty payments received by governments from mining and oil and gas companies more transparent to the public. We characterize the EITI as a VSP that lacks stringent standards and that has a moderate to high level of enforcement through the national governments that have adopted its principles. According to club theory, VSPs with these characteristics produce only a low to medium level of club benefits, in this case “social branding,” for member firms. Noting that over 60 MNCs have signed on to the EITI as of April 2012, we argue that VSPs offering low to medium club benefits should be most attractive to MNCs from countries with long arm disclosure laws, to MNCs lacking relationships with NGOs seeking inexpensive CSR, to MNCs relying upon financing from institutional and social investors, to MNCs attempting to differentiate themselves from competitors on social criteria, and to MNCs with broad stakeholder-focused top managers. We also describe the implications for MNCs if the EITI were to include a more stringent set of social requirements.

Type
Corporate Responsibility, Multinational Corporations, and Nation States
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 14 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Corporate Responsibility, Multinational Corporations, and Nation States , October 2012 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2012 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, S. A. 2011. “Limited partnership: business, government, civil society, and the public in the extractive industries transparency initiative (EITI).” Public Administration and Development 31: 50–63.Google Scholar
Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M. and Louviere, J. J. 2003. “What will consumers pay for social product features?” Journal of Business Ethics 42: 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnea, A. and Rubin, A. 2010. “Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders.” Journal of Business Ethics 97: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracking, S. 2007. Corruption and development: the anticorruption campaigns. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Bracking, S. 2009. Hiding conflict over industry returns: a stakeholder analysis of the extractive industries transparency initiative. BWPI Working Paper 91. University of Manchester, Brooks World Poverty Institute. www.manchester.ac.uk/bwpi. ISBN 978-1-906518-90-5.Google Scholar
Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2005. “Corporate reputation and philanthropy: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Business Ethics 61: 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, B., Ezickson, D. and Kocoras, J. 2010. “The Bribery Act 2010: raising the bar above the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.” Company Lawyer 31 (11): 144–1027.Google Scholar
Brown, T. J. and Dacin, P. A. 1997. “The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses.” Journal of Marketing 61: 68–84.Google Scholar
Calland, R. 2011. “Battle against corruption not yet lost.” Mail & Guardian. http://www.Mg.co.za/article/2011-04-29-battle-against-corruption-not-yet-lost. Accessed 7 November 2012.Google Scholar
Cassin, R. L. 2009. Bribery everywhere: chronicles from the foreign corrupt practices act. Self-published. http://www.lulu.com/shop/richard-l-cassin/bribery-everywhere-chronicles-from-the-foreign-corrupt-practices-act/paperback/product-4739581.html.Google Scholar
Conroy, M. E. 2007. Branded! how the certification revolution is transforming global corporations. Gabriola, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Creyer, E. H. 1997. “The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics?” Journal of Consumer Marketing 14: 421–432.Google Scholar
Doh, J. P. and Guay, T. R. 2004. “Globalization and corporate social responsibility: how non-governmental organizations influence labor and environmental codes of conduct.” Management International Review 44: 7–29.Google Scholar
Economist, The. 2012. “Extracting oil, burying data.” 402 (8773): 73. www.economist.com/node/21548214. Accessed 7 November 2012.Google Scholar
Eden, L., Lenway, S. and Schuler, D. A. 2005. “From the obsolescing bargain to the political bargaining model.” In: Grosse, R. (ed.), International Business-Government relations in the 21st century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–272.Google Scholar
Fratianni, M. and Pattison, J. 2001. “International organisations in a world of regional trade agreements: lessons from club theory.” The World Economy 24: 333–358.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.” The New York Times Magazine. 13 September.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. and Murrell, A. J. 2005. “Stakeholder influence strategies: the roles of structural and demographic determinants.” Business & Society 44: 3–31.Google Scholar
Frynas, J. G. 2010a. “Corporate social responsibility and societal governance: lessons from transparency in the oil and gas sector.” Journal of Business Ethics 93: 163–179.Google Scholar
Frynas, J. G. 2010b. “Oil industry's increasing focus on CSR.” Petroleum Economist. 1 February 2010. http://www.petroleum-economist.com/Article/2731323/Oil-industrys-increasing-focus-on-CSR.html. Accessed 7 November 2012.Google Scholar
Gillespie, E. 2008. “Stemming the tide of greenwash.” Consumer Policy Review 18 (3): 79–83.Google Scholar
Godos-Diez, J. L., Fernandez-Gago, R. and Martinez-Campillo, A. 2011. “How important are CEOs to CSR practices? An analysis of the mediating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 98: 531–548.Google Scholar
Googins, B., Mirvis, P. H. and Rochlin, S. A. 2007. Beyond good company: next generation of corporate citizenship. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Haufler, V. 2010. “Disclosure as governance: the extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world.” Global Environmental Politics 10 (3): 53–73.Google Scholar
Hilson, G. and Maconachie, R. 2009. “Good governance and the extractive industries in sub-saharan Africa.” Mineral Processing & Extractive Metallurgy Review 30: 52–100.Google Scholar
Karl, T. 1997. The paradox of plenty: oil booms and petro-states. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Karl, T. 2005. “Understanding the resource curse.” In: Tsalik, S. and Schriffin, A. (eds.), Covering oil: a guide to energy and development. New York, NY: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Kollman, K. and Prakash, A. 2002. “EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods.” Policy Sciences 35: 43–67.Google Scholar
Kolstad, I. and Wiig, A. 2009. “Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries?” World Development 37: 521–532.Google Scholar
Kramer, A. E. 2006. “Shell bows to Kremlin pressure on Sakhalin.” International Herald Tribune. 11 December. Accessible at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/business/worldbusiness/11iht-shell.3864505.html. Accessed July 12, 2012.Google Scholar
Lydenberg, S. 2007. “Universal investors and socially responsible investors: a tale of emerging affinities.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (3): 467–477.Google Scholar
March, J. G. 1994. A primer on decision making: how decisions happen. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. 2005. The main institution in the country is corruption: creating transparency in Angola. CDDRL Working Paper No. 36. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute on International Studies. Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law.Google Scholar
Mouan, L. C. 2010. “Exploring the potential benefits of asian participation in the extractive industries transparency initiative: the case of China.” Business Strategy and the Environment 19: 367–376.Google Scholar
Murray, K. B. and Vogel, C. M. 1997. “Using a hierarchy-of effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to general goodwill toward the firm: financial versus nonfinancial impacts.” Journal of Business Research 38: 141–159.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L. and De Colle, S. 2010. “Stakeholder theory: the state of the art.” The Academy of Management Annals 4: 403–445.Google Scholar
Peloza, J. and Falkenberg, L. 2009. “The role of collaboration in achieving corporate social responsibility objectives.” California Management Review 51: 95–113.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. 2006. “Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.” Harvard Business Review December 2006. 84 (12): 77–92.Google Scholar
Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. 2009. “A club theory approach to voluntary programs.” In: Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. (eds.), Voluntary programs: a club theory perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, A. and Potoski, M. 2007. “Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory perspective.” The Policy Studies Journal 35: 773–792.Google Scholar
Prakash, A. and Potoski, M. 2011. “Voluntary environmental programs: a comparative perspective.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31 (1): 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandbu, M. 2010. “Voluntary transparency scheme faces scrutiny.” Financial Times 3. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dd252206-78da-11df-a312-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2BYt6AEp1. Accessed 17 June 2011.Google Scholar
Sangle, S. 2010. “Critical success factors for corporate social responsibility: a public sector perspective.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 205–214.Google Scholar
Schueth, S. 2003. “Socially responsible investing in the United States.” Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3): 189–194.Google Scholar
Schuler, D. A. and Christmann, P. 2011. “The effectiveness of market-based social certification schemes: the case of fair trade coffee.” Business Ethics Quarterly 21: 133–156.Google Scholar
Schuler, D. A. and Cording, M. 2006. “A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers.” Academy of Management Review 31: 540–558.Google Scholar
Starik, M. 1995. “Should trees have managerial standing? towards stakeholder status for non-human nature.” Journal of Business Ethics 14: 207–217.Google Scholar
Van Tulder, R., van Wijk, J. and Kolk, A. 2009. “From chain liability to chain responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 85: 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. 2008. “Private global business regulation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261–281.Google Scholar
Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B. 1997. “The corporate social performance – financial performance link.” Strategic Management Journal 18: 303–319.Google Scholar
Yaziji, M. 2004. “Turning gadflies into allies.” Harvard Business Review 82 (2): 110–115.Google Scholar
Yergin, D. 2011. The quest: energy, security, and the remaking of the modern world. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2004. Case study research: design and methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar