Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:10:35.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Precautionary Principle to Nationwide Ban on Endosulfan in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2019

Ambalathinkal D DILEEP KUMAR  and
Chelaton JAYAKUMAR
Ambalathinkal D DILEEP KUMAR*
Affiliation:
Pesticide Action Network (PAN) India.
Chelaton JAYAKUMAR
Affiliation:
Thanal – Chemical Safety.
*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

endosulfanlitigationIndiaprecautionary principlepesticide
Type
Developments in the Field – Special Issue on Agribusiness and Accountability
Information
Business and Human Rights Journal , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 343 - 349
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Democratic Youth Federation of India v Union of India and others [2011] Supreme Court of India(Civ) 213.

2 Thanal, , Long Term Monitoring – The Impact of Pesticides on the People and Ecosystem: Part II Report – Preliminary Findings of a Survey on the Impact of Aerial Spraying on the People and Ecosystem (Kerala: Thanal Conservation Action and Information Network, 2002).Google Scholar

3 Committee on the Endosulphan Health Hazards, Government of Kerala, ‘Health Hazards of Aerial Spraying of Endosulphan in Kasaragod District, Kerala’ (2003).

4 Satheesh, Silpa, ‘Development as Recolonization: the Political Ecology of the Endosulphan Disaster in Kasargod, India’ (2017) 49:4 Critical Asian Studies 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Thanal, note 2.

6 Government of Kerala, ‘Report of the Committee to Study and Analyse Effect of Aerial Spraying of Endosulfan in the Cashew Plantations of PCK LTD in Kasaragod District’ (2001).

7 Centre for Science and Environment, ‘Report on the Contamination of Endosulfan in the Villages’, Down to Earth (28 February 2001).

8 Ibid.

9 National Institute of Occupational Health, Final Report of the Investigation of Unusual Illnesses Allegedly Produced by Endosulfan Exposure in Padre Village of Kasargod District (Ahemdabad: National Institute of Occupational Health (ICMR), 2002).Google Scholar

10 Thanal, note 2.

11 TA Ameerudheen, ‘We Want Justice: Victims of Endosulfan Poisoning in Kerala set to Start Hunger Strike’ (30 January 2019), https://scroll.in/article/911273/we-want-justice-victims-of-endosulfan-poisoning-in-kerala-set-to-start-hunger-strike (accessed 3 February 2019).

12 Joe Scaria, ‘Kerala Endosulfan Victims Allege State Terrorism’, The Economic Times (23 November 2010), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/kerala-endosulfan-victims-allege-state-terrorism/printarticle/6976895.cms (accessed 9 January 2018).

13 Government of Kerala, Note 6.

14 Jayakumar, C, ‘Status of the Endosulfan Disaster’, annex III in Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment, Report on Monitoring of Endosulfan Residues in the 11 Panchayaths of Kasaragod District, Kerala (Thiruvananthapuram: KSCSTE, 2011).Google Scholar

15 Government of Kerala, Note 6.

16 Jayakumar, note 14.

17 Adithya Pradyumna, , India’s Endosulfan Disaster – A Review of the Health Impacts and Status of Remediation (Kerala: Thanal, 2009).Google Scholar

18 Panchayat is the name for Local Self Governments at the village level.

19 Thanal, note 2.

20 Thanal is a public interest research advocacy organization, based in Kerala.

21 Thanal, note 2.

22 The Court of District Collector and District Magistrate, Kasaragod. Prohibitory order under section 133 (1) (G) of Cr. P.C (9 August 2001).

23 Jayakumar, note 14.

24 The Insecticides Act 1968 (India). http://www.cibrc.nic.in/insecticides_act.htm

25 Thiruvamkulam Nature Lovers Movement v Plantation Corporation of Kerala [2002] High Court of Kerala. OP Nos. 20716/2002, 17026/2002, 16300/2002 and 29371 of 2001.

26 Savvy Soumya Misra, ‘State of Endosulfan’, Down to Earth (December 2010).

27 Jayakumar, note 14.

28 Krishnakumar, ‘Lethal Impact’, Frontline (4 December 2010).

29 ‘Compensation for Endosulfan Victims, State to Move Court’ International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal (5 October 2006), https://www.bhopal.net/compensation-for-endosulfan-victims-state-to-move-court/ (accessed 9 January 2018).

30 Krishnakumar, note 28.

31 Democratic Youth Federation of India v Union of India and others [2011] Supreme Court of India (Civ) 213 of 2011. Order dated 13 May 2011.

32 Democratic Youth Federation of India v Union of India and others [2011] Supreme Court of India (Civ) 213 of 2011. Order dated 30 January 2017.

33 Soma Basu, ‘Relief Given at Last to Kerala’s Endosulfan Victims’, Down to Earth (2013), http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/-relief-given-at-last-to-keralas-endosulfan-victims-40742 (accessed 10 January 2018).

34 ‘Endosulfan Victims Warn of Hunger Stir’, The Times of India (17 January 2019), https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/endosulfan-victims-warn-of-hunger-stir/articleshowprint/67565672.cms (accessed 19 January 2019).