No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Two dhāraṇī prints in the Stein Collection at the British Museum1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2014
Abstract
This paper examines two tenth-century woodblock prints from Dunhuang acquired by Sir Aurel Stein. They are registered under the numbers Ch.00151 and Ch.00152 at the British Museum. The first, Ch.00151, is dedicated to Avalokiteśvara and the second, Ch.00152, to Amitābha, both with magical formulas written in Siddham characters in square or circular fashion around the central image of the respective deity. Editions, translations and identifications of the texts are presented along with a study of the Chinese inscriptions on the side of the xylographs. It is shown that these two objects were apparently produced to serve as amulets.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 105 - 117
- Copyright
- Copyright © SOAS, University of London 2014
Footnotes
1
I am grateful to Dr Michael Willis for calling my attention to these two xylographs and Dr Gábor Kósa for reading and interpreting the Chinese inscriptions. Many thanks to Dr Péter-Dániel Szántó, Gerd Mevissen, Professor Gudrun Bühnemann, Professor Harunaga Isaacson and Rolf W. Giebel for their comments. This research was funded by a grant from the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund (TAMOP 4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0003). I thank the János Szerb Foundation, Budapest for its support.
References
Ācāryakriyāsamuccaya. See Moriguchi 1992.Google Scholar
Ādikarmapradīpa. See Takahashi 1993.Google Scholar
Amoghapāśahṛdaya. See Meisezahl 1962.Google Scholar
Amoghapāśakalparāja. See Mikkyo-Seiten-Kenkyukai 1998–2001.Google Scholar
Binyon, Laurence. 1916. A Catalogue of Japanese and Chinese Woodcuts Preserved in the Sub-Department of Oriental Prints and Drawings in the British Museum. London.Google Scholar
Bisschop, Peter and Griffiths, Arlo. 2007. “The practice involving the Ucchuṣmas (Atharvavedapariśiṣṭa 36)”, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 24: 1–47.Google Scholar
Bodhimaṇḍālaṃkāra. See Scherrer-Schaub 1994 and Schopen 1985.Google Scholar
Boucher, Daniel. 1991. “The Pratītyasamutpādagāthā and its role in the medieval cult of the relics”, Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 14: 1–27.Google Scholar
Brough, John. 1977. “The Arapacana syllabary in the Old Lalita Vistara”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 40: 85–95.Google Scholar
Copp, Paul. 2008. “Altar, amulet, icon. Transformations in dhāraṇī amulet culture, 740–980”, Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie, 17: 239–64.Google Scholar
Copp, Paul. Forthcoming. The Body Incantatory: Spells and the Ritual Imagination in Medieval Chinese Buddhism. New York.Google Scholar
Davidson, Ronald M. 2011. “Sources and inspirations: esoteric Buddhism in South Asia”, in Orzech, Charles D. et al. (eds), Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia. Leiden, 19–24.Google Scholar
Fraser, Sarah E. 2004. Performing the Visual: The Practice of Buddhist Wall Painting in China and Central Asia, 618–960. Stanford.Google Scholar
Giebel, Rolf W. 2011. “Taisho volumes 18–21”, in Orzech, Charles D. et al. (eds), Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia. Leiden, 27–36.Google Scholar
Guhyasamāja. See Matsunaga 1978.Google Scholar
Hidas, Gergely. 2010. “Mahāpratisarāvidyāvidhi, The spell-manual of the Great Amulet”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 63: 473–84.Google Scholar
Hidas, Gergely. 2012. Mahāpratisarā-Mahāvidyārājñī. The Great Amulet, Great Queen of Spells. Introduction, Critical Editions and Annotated Translation. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Kriyāsaṃgraha. See Tanemura 2000.Google Scholar
Kudṛṣṭinirghātana. See Mikkyo-Seiten-Kenkyukai 1988.Google Scholar
Chandra, Lokesh and Rani, Sharada. 1978. Mudrās in Japan. Symbolic Hand-Postures in Japanese Mantrayāna or the Esoteric Buddhism of the Shingon Denomination. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Mahāmāyūrī. See Takubo 1972.Google Scholar
Mahāpratisarā. See Hidas 2012.Google Scholar
Mahāvyutpatti. See Sakaki 1916.Google Scholar
Mañjuśriyamūlakalpa. See Ganapati Sastri 1920–25.Google Scholar
Meisezahl, Richard O. 1962. “The Amoghapāśahṛdaya Dhāraṇī. The early Sanskrit manuscript of the Reiunji critically edited and translated”, Monumenta Nipponica 17: 265–328.Google Scholar
Mikkyo-Seiten-Kenkyukai. 1986. “Vajradhātumahāmaṇḍalopāyikā-sarvavajrodaya by Ānandagarbha”, Taisho-Daigaku Sogo-Bukkyo-Kenkyujo-Kiyo, 8: 28–56.Google Scholar
Mikkyo-Seiten-Kenkyukai. 1988. “Kudṛṣṭinirghātana by Advayavajra”, Taisho-Daigaku Sogo-Bukkyo-Kenkyusho-Nenpo 10: 10–37.Google Scholar
Mikkyo-Seiten-Kenkyukai. 1998–2001. “Transcribed Sanskrit text of the Amoghapāśakalparāja. Parts I–IV”, Taisho-Daigaku Sogo-Bukkyo-Kenkyusho-Nenpo, 20–23.Google Scholar
Moriguchi, Mitsutoshi. 1992. “Ācāryakriyāsamuccaya Kanjo(bon) Tekisuto to Wayaku (I-2): Ryakujutsukyo ‘Hosshikishidai’ Kaigi”, Chisan Gakuho 41: 1–31.Google Scholar
Nanjio, Bunyiu. 1883. A Catalogue of the Chinese Translation of the Buddhist Tripiṭaka. Oxford.Google Scholar
Payne, Richard K. 2007. “Aparimitāyus: ‘Tantra’ and ‘Pure Land’ in medieval Indian Buddhism?” Pacific World 9: 273–308.Google Scholar
Saddharmapuṇḍarīka. See Vaidya 1960.Google Scholar
Sādhanamālā. See Bhattacharyya 1925–28.Google Scholar
Sakurai, Munenobu. 1996. Indo Mikkyo Girei Kenkyu: Koki indo Mikkyo no Kanchoshidai. Kyoto.Google Scholar
Salomon, Richard. 1990. “New evidence for the Gāndhārī origin of the Arapacana syllabary”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 110: 255–73.Google Scholar
Salomon, Richard. 1993. “An additional note on Arapacana”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 113: 275–6.Google Scholar
Saṃvarodaya. See Tsuda 1974.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Alexis. 2007. “Atharvavedins in Tantric territory: the Āṅgirasakalpa texts of the Oriya Paippalādins and their connection with the Trika and the Kālīkula, with critical editions of the Parājapavidhi, the Parāmantravidhi, and the *Bhadrakālīmantravidhiprakaraṇa”, in Griffiths, Arlo and Schmiedchen, Annette (eds), The Atharvaveda and its Paippalāda Śākhā: Historical and Philological Papers on a Vedic Tradition. Aachen, 195–311.Google Scholar
Sarvadurgatipariśodhana. See Skorupski 1983.Google Scholar
Sarvatathāgatatattvasaṃgraha. See Horiuchi 1983 and 1997.Google Scholar
Sarvavajrodaya. See Mikkyo-Seiten-Kenkyukai 1986.Google Scholar
Scherrer-Schaub, Cristina A. 1994. “Some Dhāraṇī written on paper functioning as Dharmakāya relics. A tentative approach to PT 350”, in Kvaerne, Per (ed.), Tibetan Studies, Proceedings of the 6th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Fagernes 1992. Vol. 2. Oslo, 711–27.Google Scholar
Schopen, Gregory. 1985. “The Bodhigarbhālaṅkāralakṣa and Vimaloṣṇīṣa Dhāraṇī in Indian Inscriptions: two sources for the practice of Buddhism in medieval India”, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 29: 119–49.Google Scholar
Śikṣāsamuccaya. See Vaidya 1961.Google Scholar
Skilling, Peter. 1996. “An Arapacana syllabary in the Bhadrakalpika-Sūtra”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 116: 522–3.Google Scholar
Skilling, Peter. 2008. “Buddhist sealings and the ye dharmā stanza”, in Sengupta, Gautam and Chakravorty, Sharmi (eds), Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia. Delhi, 503–25.Google Scholar
Skorupski, Tadeusz. 1983. Sarvadurgatipariśodhanatantra, Elimination of All Evil Destinies. Sanskrit and Tibetan texts with introduction, English translation and notes. Delhi.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Henrik H. 1991–92. “Typology and iconography in the esoteric Buddhist art of Dunhuang”, Silk Road Art and Archaeology 2: 285–349.Google Scholar
Stein, Marc Aurel. 1921. Serindia: Detailed Report of Archaeological Explorations in Central Asia and Westernmost China. 5 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Strauch, Ingo. 2008. “The Bajaur collection of Kharoṣṭhī manuscripts – a preliminary survey”, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 25: 103–36.Google Scholar
Strauch, Ingo. 2009. “Two stamps with the Bodhigarbhālaṅkāralakṣa dhāraṇī from Afghanistan and some further remarks on the classification of objects with the ye dharmā formula”, in Mevissen, Gerd J.R. and Banerji, Arundhati (eds), Prajñādhara, Essays on Asian Art, History, Epigraphy and Culture in Honour of Gouriswar Bhattacharya. New Delhi, 37–56.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Hisao. 1993. “Ādikarmapradīpa bonbun kotei: Tokyo daigaku shahon ni yoru”, in Indogaku Mikkyogaku kenkyu: Miyasaka Yusho hakase koki kinen ronbunshu. Kyoto, 129–56.Google Scholar
Tanemura, Ryugen. 2000. A Preliminary Edition of Chapters 1–6 of the Kriyāsaṃgrahapañjikā. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Tsiang, Katherine R. 2010. “Buddhist printed images and texts of the eighth–tenth centuries: typologies of replication and representation”, in Kapstein, Matthew T. and van Schaik, Sam (eds), Esoteric Buddhism at Dunhuang. Leiden, 201–52.Google Scholar
Tsukamoto, Keisho et al. 1989. A Descriptive Bibliography of the Sanskrit Buddhist Literature. Vol. IV. The Buddhist Tantra. Kyoto.Google Scholar
Unno, Mark. 2011. “Komyo Shingon”, in Orzech, Charles D. et al. (eds), Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia. Leiden, 863–75.Google Scholar
Uṣṇīṣavijayā. See Yuyama 1997.Google Scholar
Vajrāvalī. See Sakurai 1996.Google Scholar
Wang, Helen and Perkins, John (eds). 2008. Handbook to the Collections of Sir Aurel Stein in the UK. London.Google Scholar
Yuyama, Akira. 1997. “The Uṣṇīṣa-vijayā dhāraṇī transliterated by Tz'u-hsien”, in Kieffer-Pulz, Petra and Hartmann, Jens-Uwe (eds), Bauddhavidyāsudhākaraḥ. Studies in Honour of Heinz Bechert on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Swisttal-Odendorf, 729–39.Google Scholar