Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:08:27.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tughluqabad, the earliest surviving town of the Delhi sultanate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Mehrdad Shokoohy  and
Natalie H. Shokoohy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tughluqabad is the first of many sultanate and Mughul towns which were purposely planned and constructed on previously uninhabited sites. Built early in the fourteenth century, Tughluqabad was to serve as the capital of the newly established Tughluq dynasty. There were, of course, three earlier Muslim capitals in the vicinity, the first the Delhi of Rāi Pithūrā, converted to an Islamic town after the Ghurid conquest in 588/1192–3; the second Jalāl al-dīn Khahīs Shahr-i naw, which was founded by Muՙiẓẓ al-dīn Kai Qubād (685–8/1286–9) at Kīlukharī (or Kīlugharī) but left incomplete at the time of his death, and the third Sīrī, built by Alՙ al-dīn Khaljī between 698/1298–9 and 700/1300–1 in the fields outside the walls of the older Delhi, but nothing has remained from these towns except parts of the fortification walls and some isolated monuments. The ruins of Tughluqabad, on the other hand, are enshrined in a time capsule. Built between 1320 and 1325 by Ghiyāth al-dīn Tughluq, the town had a brief life, and within a generation was abandoned and its population reduced to the size of a small village. As a result, most of its remains are datable to the short period of its duration in the first half of the fourteenth century. The only exception, as we shall see, are the remains of a small settlement which continued to exist around the old town centre, and in the late Mughal period also occupied the citadel.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , October 1994 , pp. 516 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The present work is a preliminary report of a survey carried out in three seasons in 1986, 1990 and 1992 of the remains which could be seen above ground in Tughluqabad. The field-work has been supported by the British Academy. In the first stage a town plan was produced based on the surviving features on the ground, and with the help of an earlier published aerial photograph. The plan was then checked and amended on site and finally the main structures were surveyed in some detail. The final drawings were made in London with the help of Bahram Leissi, who also made a separate visit to the site.

2 Jauzjānī, Minhāj Sirāj, Ṭabaqāt-i Nāṣirī (Tehran: Dunyā-yi Kitāb, 1984), i, 401, 417Google Scholar.

3 Barnī, Ḍiyā’ al-dīn, Tārīkh-i Fīrūz Shāhī (Calcutta: Bibliotheca Indica, Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1862), 176Google Scholar.

4 ibid., 301–2.

5 Wetzel, Friedrich, Islamische Grabbauten in Indien (Ausgabe, 1918, repr. Osnabrück: Otto Zeller, 1970), 24–32Google Scholar; Yamamoto, Tatsuro, Ara, Matsuo and Tsukinowa, Tokifusa, Delhi, architectural remains of the Delhi Sultanate period (Tokyo: Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo, 1968), ii, 34–56Google Scholar.

6 Archaeological Survey of India Reports (Cunningham series) (ASIR), I, 1862–5, 212–17Google Scholar, pi. 35; also see Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, xxxm, 1864, lxix–lxxivGoogle Scholar; ASIR, iv, 1871-2, 77Google Scholar.

7 Waddington, Hilary, ‘ ‘Ādilābād, a part of the fourth Delhi’, Ancient India, i, 1946, 60–76Google Scholar.

8 Yamamoto, T. et al. , I (1967), 100, m (1970), 46–54Google Scholar. Yamamoto also reported a number of wells and reservoirs in Tughluqabad, see vol. i, 92–4 nos. W2–7, W15, W23–4, W36–8

9 Some restoration work and clearance has been carried out on the walls of Tughluqabad early in this century. See Archaeological Survey of India, Northern Circle, Annual Progress Report (ASINC), 1914, 40, pi. 27; 1921, 14, 35, pis. 9–17; Archaeological Survey of India Annual Reports (ASIAR), 1904–5, 18–19; 1913–14, i, 3; 1920–1, 3; 1921–2, 4; 1922–3, 7; 1923–4, 141; 1924–5, 5, 9; 1925–6, 199; 1926–7, 254. For general works referring to Tughluqabad and Ghiyāth al-dīn's tomb see Khan, Saiyid Ahmad, Āthār al ṣanādīd (Lucknow, 1876), 11–15 figs. 1–7Google Scholar; Hearn, Gordon, The seven cities of Delhi, a description and history (2nd ed., revised, Calcutta and Simla), 1928, 36–40Google Scholar; Marshall, John, ‘The monuments of Muslim India’, in The Cambridge History of India (Cambridge: CUP, 1928), in, 585–6Google Scholar; Brown, Percy, Indian architecture (Islamic Period) (1942, 7th reprint, Bombay: Taraporevala, 1981), 20–1Google Scholar; Toy, Sidney, The strongholds of India (London, 1957), 116–21Google Scholar; Madan, P. L., ‘Adilabad: a dream of Muhammad bin Tughluq’, Islamic Culture, XXXVII, 1963, 49–51Google Scholar; Burton-Page, John, entry under Delhi in The Encyclopaedia of Islam, new, ed. (London-Leiden: Brill, 1965), n, 257–8Google Scholar; Yamamoto, T. et al. , I, 52, 64, 102Google Scholar; Nath, R., History of sultanate architecture (New Delhi, 1978), 52–5Google Scholar; Nath, R., Monuments of Delhi: historical study (New Delhi, 1979), 4–5, 35, pis. 2, 22Google Scholar; Sharma, Y. D., Delhi and its neighbourhood (New Delhi: ASI, 1982), 24–5, 101–4Google Scholar; Welch, Anthony and Crane, Howard, ‘The Tughluqs: master builders of the Delhi sultanate’, Muqarnas, i, 1983, 127–8Google Scholar. Rajan, K. V. Soundara, Islam builds in India (Delhi, 1983), 76–7Google Scholar.

10 Barnī, , 442Google Scholar.

11 ibid., 432–3.

12 b, Muhammad. ‘Abd'ullāh called Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, Tuḥfat al-nuẓẓār figharā'ib al-amṣār wa'ajāib al-asfār, ed. Talal, Harb (Beirut, 1987), 437Google Scholar.

13 Barnī, , 449–50Google Scholar.

14 Baṭṭūṭa, Ibn, 432Google Scholar.

15 ibid., 461. This was the general belief of the time and is also recorded by the Arab historian hahāb al-dīn Abū ‘l-‘Abbās Ahmad b. Yahyā known as Ibn Fadl'ullāh al-‘Umarī (697- 49/1297–1348). See a translation of his Masālik al-absār fī mamālik al-amsār in Elliot, H. M. and Dowson, J., The history of India as told by its own historians (London, 1871), m, 610–1Google Scholar.

16 Barnī, , 452-Google Scholar; Shokoohy, M., Haryana I, The column of Fīrū Shāh and other Islamic nscriptions from the district of Hisar (London: Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum, 1988), Part IV, ol. XLVU, 21Google Scholar. The date given above appears in the inscription of the column of Fīrūz Shāh at Fatehabad, and varies slightly from that given by BarnI and other historians; also see b, Yaḥyā. al-Sihrindl, Aḥmad, TāīXkh-i Mubārak Shāhī (Calcutta, 1931), 96Google Scholar.

17 ASIR, 1862-, 213Google Scholar; also see Nath, R., History of sultanate architecture, 52Google Scholar. Nath claims, ithout any evidence, that Tughluqabad was built to enclose an already populated area. This is ot supported by any of the historical accounts.

18 Barnī, , 450Google Scholar.

19 Bauṭṭūṭa, Ibn, 461Google Scholar.

20 Barnī also notes that the treasury was in Tughluqabad, and that when Muhammad b. ughluq decided to reduce the circulation of copper coins and replace them with silver and gold, ounds of copper coins were accumulated at Tughluqabad. See Barnī, , 476Google Scholar.

21 ‘Afīf, Shams Sirāj, Tārīkh-i Fīrūz Shāhī (Calcutta, 1891), 148Google Scholar.

22 ibid., 124–8. For a complete translation of this passage see Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., Hisār-i Fīrūza (London: Monographs on Art Archaeology and Architecture, 1988), 6–8Google Scholar.

23 Barnī, , 456Google Scholar.

24 BaṬṬūta, Ibn, 493–4Google Scholar; Barnī, , 473–4, 482, 485–6Google Scholar.

25 Tughluq, Fīrūz Shāh, Futūhāt-i Fīrūz Shāhī (Aligarh: Aligarh Muslim University, 1954), 12–15Google Scholar; Barnī, , 561–6Google Scholar; Sirāj, Shams, 330–3Google Scholar.

26 Tūs has not yet been surveyed. For aerial photographs see M. Y., Kiani (ed.) A general study on urbanization and urban planning in Iran (Tehran: Ministry of Islamic Guidance Press, 1986), 228, 477Google Scholar.

27 ibid., 214, 229.

28 Gardin, Jean-Claude, Lashkarī Bāzār, Mémoires de la délegation archéologique française en Afghanistan (DAFA), (Paris, 1963), XVIII, Part II, 1–3Google Scholar; Schlumberger, D., Lashkarī Bāzār, Mémoires de DAFA (Paris, 1978), XVIII, Part IA, 7–11, 99, pis. 1–2Google Scholar. Our plan of Bust is based on a fresh and unpublished survey carried out in 1977 by M. Shokoohy. For other publications on Bust see Féhervári, G. and Shokoohy, M., ‘Archaeological notes on Lashkarī Bāzār, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, LXXII, 1980, 83–95Google Scholar; Ball, Warwick, Archaeological gazetteer of Afghanistan (Paris: Editions Recherche sur les civilizations, ADPF, 1982), I, 63Google Scholar.

29 Yamamoto, T. et al. , I, 111–12, no. O.52Google Scholar

30 Baṭṭūṭa, Ibn, 437–9Google Scholar.

31 ASINC, 1912, 22, pl. 2; 1917, pl. 10bGoogle Scholar.

32 ASIAR, 1914–15, 140, pl. 70bGoogle Scholar; Yazdani, G., Bidar, its history and monuments (Oxford, 1947), 30–1, pls. 2, 4Google Scholar.

33 Khan, Saiyid Ahmad, Āthār al-ṣanādīd (Lucknow, 1876), 11Google Scholar; also see Nath, R., Monuments of Delhi, 5Google Scholar. Tīmūr and his historian Muḥammad Sharaf al-dīn Yazdī both record a building with the name of jahān-namā set on the top of the hill and apparently near the east bank of the Jumna river about two parasangs (12 km.) from Delhi. The building and its surrounding area was plundered by Tīmūr 's army on 27 or 28 Rabi’ I, 801/7 or 8 December 1398, and later was used as a garrison. This may not be the same as the Jahān-namā of Tughluqabad, as Tīmūr and Yazdī do not record the name of Tughluqabad and both mention that their jahān-namā was a work of Fīrūz Shāh Tughluq. It is hard to believe that at the time of Tīmūr's attack on Delhi, soon after the death of Fīrūz Shāh, the same generation of people could not remember who was the founder of which building. See translations of Malfūẓāt-i Tīmūrī and Yazdī's Zafar-nāma in Elliot, H. M. and Dowson, John, The history of India as told by its own historians, iii, 434, 495Google Scholar.

34 Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., Ḥiṣār-i Fīrūza, 21, fig. 6Google Scholar.

35 Sirāj, Shams, 126.Google Scholar

36 Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., Nagaur, Sultanate and early Mughal history and architecture of the district of Nagaur, India (London: Royal Asiatic Society, 1992, Apx. IV, fig. 69Google Scholar; also see Garrick, H. B. W., ‘Report of a tour in the Punjab and Rajputana in 1833–4’, ASIR, XXIII 1887, 55Google Scholar; Chaghtai, A., ‘Some inscriptions from Jodhpur state, Rajputana’, Epigraphia Indo- Moslemica, 1949–50, 43Google Scholar.

37 Yamamoto, T. et al. , I, 72, fig. 30Google Scholar.

38 Brown, Kenneth, ‘Making of the city-life line I’, Architectural Review, CLIX, 951, 1976, 260–83Google Scholar; Herdeg, Klaus, Formal structure in Islamic architecture of Iran and Turkistan (New York, 1990), 13–20Google Scholar.

39 Abbas Rizvi, Saiyid Athar and Adams Flynn, Vincent John, Fathpur Sikri (Bombay, 1975), 115, plan facing p. 7Google Scholar.

40 Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., Nagaur, fig. 3.Google Scholar

41 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, 465–6.

42 ibid., 482.

43 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa uses the word mashwar (place of audience) for both covered halls and open courts. We know from other sources, for example in the case of Ahmadabad described below, that audiences were also held in open courts, and even in the square in front of the palace. From his description quoted here it seems likely that Ibn Baṭṭūṭa is referring to open areas; also see H. A. R., Gibb, The travels of Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, ed. Defremery, C. and Sanguinetti, B. R. 1971), iii, 685, n. 112Google Scholar.

44 Gibb translates the word kura as mall, presumably referring to the western game of pall mall, a game played on open ground in which a ball is hit by mallets, but of course the royal ball game in Iran and India was polo, as given in our translation. This confirms that mashwar here refers to open ground.

45 Khwāja Niẓām, al-Mulk, Siyar al-mulūk also known as Siyāsat-nāma, ed. Darke, Hubert (revised ed., Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications, 1985), 276–7Google Scholar.

46 Mandū, G. Yazdani, the City of Joy (Oxford: OUP, 1929), 70–5Google Scholar.

47 Pope, Arthur Upham, A survey of Persian art (London-Tokyo: OUP, 1977), II, 545Google Scholar.

48 K. A. C. Creswell, Early Muslim architecture (Oxford, 1969), I, Part 2, 578, 584–8, figs. 630, 644, for the Sasanian origin see ibid., 515–18.

49 ibid., H, 1940, 66–7, fig. 64.

50 Scerrato, Umberto, ‘The first two excavation campaigns at Ghazni’, 1957–8, East and West, X, 1959, 25–7Google Scholar; Sourdel-Thomine, Janine and Spuler, Bertold, Die Kunst des Islam (Berlin, 1973), 277–9Google Scholar; also see Ball, Warwick, Archaeological Gazetteer of Afghanistan, I, 105–7, II, 440, pl. 24Google Scholar.

51 Schlumberger, D., Lashkarī Bāzār, Mèmoires de la DAFA, xvm, Part IA, 34–5Google Scholar, pi. 3. For the relationship of the throne room with the smaller person to person audience chamber behind it see ibid., 3 8–41, pis. 13–16.

52 Yazdani, G., Bidar, its history and monuments, 62–77, pis. 2 3 - 3 1Google Scholar.

53 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, 466.

54 Yazdani, G., Bidar, 64Google Scholar.

55 Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., Hisār-i Firūza, 24Google Scholar.

56 The only other Tughluq palace which has survived extensively is Fīrūz Shāh's palace in Hisar, but little remains of the audience halls there, and the general organization of the planning is not as clear as that of Tughluqabad, see ibid., 17–32.

57 Zaid Baihaqī, Abū'l-Hasan Alī b. known as Ibn Funduq, Tārīkh-i Baihaq (Tehran: Furūghī, 1938), 268.Google Scholar

58 Yamamoto, T. et al. , i, 92, no. W.5Google Scholar.

59 ibid., 92–3, nos. W.2–4, W.6–7; in, 101–2.

60 Burgess, James, The Muhammadan architecture of Ahmadabad, Part I, A.D. 1412 to 1520 (London: ASI, 1900)Google Scholar, New Imperial Series, xxiv, 25. The royal square of Ahmadabad is partly preserved and is discussed below.

61 Yazdani, G., Bidar, 44Google Scholar.

62 Ibn Baṭṭūṭṭa, 534–5.

63 ibid., 439.

64 Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., ‘The architecture of Baha al-din Tughrul in the region of Bayana, Rajasthan’, Muqarnas, IV, 1987, 120–1, 125Google Scholar.

65 Yazdani, G., Mandu the City of Joy, 56, pis. 6, 10Google Scholar.

66 Survey in ASIR, xv, 1882, 90–3; For a discussion on the function of the gallery see Qadir, Muhammad Abdul, ‘The so-called ladies’’ gallery in the early mosques of Bangladesh’ Journal of Varendra Research Museum, Vii, 1981–2, University of Rajshahi, 1985, 161–72Google Scholar; also see Asher, Catherine B., ‘Inventory of key monuments’, The Islamic heritage of Bengal, Michell, G. (ed.) (Paris: UNESCO, 1984), 109–11Google Scholar.

67 Sirāj, Shams, 80; Sikandar b. Muhammad Manjhū, b. Akbar, Mirāt-i Sikandarī, ed. S. C. Misra, and Rahman, M. L. (Baroda: Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, 1961), 38Google Scholar.

68 Muhammad Jahāngīr, Gūrkānī, Jahāngīr-nāma (Tūzuk-i Jahāngīrī) ed. Hashim, Muhammad (Tehran: Bunyād-i Farhang-i Irān, 1980), 242Google Scholar.

69 M., and Shokoohy, N. H., Hisār-i Firūza, 32–3Google Scholar.

70 ASIR, XI, 1880, 105–6; Ḟṻhrer, A., The Sharqi architecture of Jaunpur (Calcutta: ASI, 1889)Google Scholar, New Series, i, 26–7; Z. Desai, A., ‘Inscription from the Jaunpur Fort mosque’, Epigraphia Indica, Arabic and Persian Supplement, 1975, 21Google Scholar.

71 ASINC, 1915, 13, pi. 1; 1916, 10, pis. 16–17; Welch, A. and Crane, H. ‘The Tughluqs, master builders of the Delhi sultanate’, 133–8Google Scholar.

72 Shams Sirāj, 305–15; Anon., Sīrat-i Firūz Shāhī, School of Oriental and African Studies, cat. no. MS. 283116, 179–207; Page, J. A., A memoir on Kotla Fīrūz Shāhī, MASI, LII, 1937, 33–42Google Scholar, Persian text 3–25. In these works the columns are always referred to as minarets (minār).

73 M., and Shokoohy, N. H., Ḥiṣār-i Fīrūza, 116–18Google Scholar.

74 For the history and few remaining sultanate monuments of Jaunpur see Fūhrer, A., The Shargi architecture of JaunpurGoogle Scholar.

75 M., and Shokoohy, N. H., Ḥiṣār-i Fīrūza, 12–15Google Scholar.

76 Burgess, James, The Muhammadan architecture of Ahmadabad, Part I, A.D. 1412 to 1520, pi. 2Google Scholar.

77 Yamamoto, T. et al. , i, 111Google Scholar.

78 Theodore Hope, C., Architecture at Ahmadabad the capital of Goozerat, with architectural notes by James Fergusson and photographs by Colonel Biggs (London, 1866), 42Google Scholar; for the seventeenth-century accounts of the Maidān-i Shāh of Ahmadabad see Mandelslo, Johan Albrecht vonJournal und Observation (1637–1640) (Copenhagen, 1942), 48, 58, 65Google Scholar; Voyages de Mr. de Thevenot, in Surendranath, Sen (ed.), Indian travels of Thevenot and Careri (New Delhi, 1949), 12–13Google Scholar. The Mir'āt-i Sikandarī also describes the palace and its gardens, but as the description is given in a panegyric (qasīda) it is not easy to define precisely to which parts it is referring, see Muhammad, Sikandar b.Akbar, Manjhū b., Mir'āt-i Sikandarī (Baroda, 1961), 35–6Google Scholar.

79 Elliot, H. M. and Dowson, John, The history of India as told by its own historians, iii, 447–8Google Scholar.

80 Cousens, Henry, Bijapur and its architectural remains (Bombay: ASI, 1916) New Imperial Series, xxxvii, pi. 118Google Scholar, map of the environs of Bijapur.