Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:53:30.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tigre Syntax and Semitic Ethiopian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

S. Eaz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has long been argued that the peculiar syntactic traits which typify the modern Semitic Ethiopian languages can be accounted for by the Cushitic substratum, notably the word order of the sentence and the system of qualification (the qualifier-qualified order of elements). It has been suggested that among these languages Tigre is ‘more Semitic’ since (a) it is much less rigid as regards word order, and (b) ‘it may optionally have either the Semitic pattern or the Cushitic one’. A parallel diachronic statement would be that as regards its syntax Tigre was more successful in resisting Cushitic influence or, for some reason, less exposed to it. Here, to avoid the problem of measuring the syntactic features of Tigre in general Semitic terms, Gə'əaz is usually taken as the mode for a Semitic language. In this respect it follows that descriptively Tigre is more Gə'əz-like than the other modern Semitic Ethiopian languages. In spite of the plausibility of such an explanation, it seems to be a matter of scholarly tradition rather than the result of thorough investigation, i.e. the belief that Tigre is the odd man out among its modern relations by virtue of its syntax is an impression rather than a proven observation.

Type
Articles Notes and Communications
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 235 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Abbreviations

'Ag'azot v. Roden, K. G.Google Scholar
Armbraster, C. H.: Dongolese Nubian: a grammar. Cambridge: University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Armbruster, C. H.: Initia Amharica: an introduction to spoken Amharic. Part I: grammar. Cambridge: University Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Bender, M. L. (ed.): The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia. Michigan: African Studies Center, Michigan State University, 1976.Google Scholar
Cerulli, E.: Studi Etiopici, I. La lingua e la storia di Harar. Roma: Istituto per l'Oriente, 1936.Google Scholar
Chaine, M.: Grammaire éthiopienne. Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique, 1907.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.: Études d'éthiopien meridional. Paris: Geuthner, 1931. (Études.)Google Scholar
Cohen, M.: Nouvelles etudes d'ethiopien meridional. (Bibliothèque de l'École des Hautes Études, Sciences Historiques et Philologiques, 275.) Paris: Honore Champion, 1939. NE.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.: Le système verbal sémitique et Vexpression du temps. (Publications de l'École de Langues Orientales Vivantes. Série 5, XI.) Paris: E. Leroux, 1924. SV.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.: Traité de langue amharique (Abyssinie). (Université de Paris. Travaux et Mémoires de l'lnstitut d'Ethnologie, XXIV.) Paris: Institut d'Ethnologie, 1936.Google Scholar
Dillmann, A.: Ghrestomathia Aethiopica, edita et gkssario explanata ab A. Dillmann. Lipsiae: T. 0. Weigel, 1866.Google Scholar
Dillmann, A.: Ethiopic grammar. Second ed. enlarged and improved (1899) by Bezold, Carl… Translated by Crichton, J. A.. London: Williams and Norgate, 1907.Google Scholar
DT v. Leslau, W.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. I.: An Amharic reader. Cambridge: University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Études v. Cohen, M.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, G.: The Amharic tense-system: thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy [to the Senate of the Hebrew University]. Jerusalem: [the author], 1966. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Ḥaddis galad 'əhiga tigre; kālə' ḥətām 'ərrum. I1 Nuovo Testamento in lingua tigrē. (Seoonda edizione riveduta.) Asmara: British and Foreign Bible Society, 1931. (First ed.: 1902.)Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.: Ethiopian Semitic: studies in classification. (Journal of Semitic Studies, Mono-graph 2.) Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A.: ‘Beja’, in Bender, M. L. (ed.): The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, 97–132.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, O.: The language of dialogue in modern Amharic literature: thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy [to the Senate of the Hebrew University]. Jerusalem: [the author], 1968. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
Leslau, W.: ‘Contributions a l'étude du harari’, Journal Asiatique, CCXXIX, 1937.Google Scholar
Leslau, W.: Documents tigrigna (éthiopien septentrional). Grammaire et textes. (Collection Linguistique publiée par la Société de Linguistique de Paris, XLVIII.) Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1941. DT.Google Scholar
Leslau, W.: ‘The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: a problem of substratum’, Word, I, 1, 1945, 59–82.Google Scholar
Leslau, W.: Short grammar of Tigré (North Ethiopic): dialect of Mensa. (Publications of the American Oriental Society. Offprint series, no. 18.) New Haven, 1945.Google Scholar
Leslau, W.: ‘Supplementary observations on Tigré grammar’, JAOS, LXVIII, 3, 1948, 127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LH v. Littmann, E., AND Höfher, M.Google Scholar
Littman, E.: ‘Bilitterale Verba im Tigrē’, in Donum Natalicium H. S. Nyberg Oblatum, Uppsala, 1954, 94–101.Google Scholar
Littmann, E.: ‘Die Pronomina im Tigrē. Ein Beitrag zur aethiopischen Dialektkunde’, Zeitschrift fur Assyriologie (ZA), XII, 1897, 188–230, 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littmann, E.: Publications of the Princeton Expedition to Abyssinia. 4 vols. in 5. Leyden: E. J. Brill, 1910–1915. PL.Google Scholar
Littmann, E., AND Höfher, M.: Worterbuch der Tigrē-Sprache: Tigrē-Deulsch-Englisch. (Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz. Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission, xi.) Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1962. LH.Google Scholar
Lt su Sång v. Sundström, G. R.Google Scholar
Mark, , 1889 ed. = Evangelium enligt Markus, på Tigre-språket. Tryckt på Missionspressen i Monkullo, 1889, in 16°, 52 pp.Google Scholar
Moreno, M. M.: ‘L'azione del cuscitico sul sistema morfologico delle lingue semitiche dell'Etiopia’, Rassegna di studi etiopici (RSE), VII, 2, 1948, 121–30.Google Scholar
Mundy, C. S.: ‘Turkish syntax as a system of qualification’, BSOAS, XVII, 1, 1955, 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NE v. Cohen, M.Google Scholar
Norlen, W., AND Lundgren, F.: Manuale di storia sacra (versione tigré). Seconda edizione. Riveduta da K. G. Rodén e Giuseppe Hemmed. Asmara: Tipografia Evangelica, 1925.Google Scholar
NT, 1931 ed. v. Haddis galad.Google Scholar
OT, Asmara = The Old Testament in Gə'əz. Vol. I. Asmara, 1955 E.C.Google Scholar
OT, Boyd, J. O. ed. = The Ostateuch in Ethiopic, according to the text of the Paris codex, edited by J. O. Boyd. Part I: Genesis. (Bibliotheca Abessinica, III.) Leyden: E. J. Brill, 1909.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.: ‘Relative clauses in Tigre’, Word, XVII, 1, 1961, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PL v. Littmann, E.Google Scholar
Polotsky, H. J.: ‘Syntaxe amharique et syntaxe turque’, Atti del convegno internazionale di studi etiopici (Roma, 2–4 aprile, 1959). Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1960, 117–22.Google Scholar
Rodén, K. G.: Kətāb 'ag'azot waqər'ān. Third ed., revised by Aron, Musa. Asmara, 1958.Google Scholar
Rodén, K. G.: Le tribù dei Mensa. Storia, legge e costumi. A. Testo originate in tigrè. Part I, Asmara, 1913, 1–91.Google Scholar
Storia v. Norlén, W., AND Lundgren, F.Google Scholar
Sundström, G. R.: ‘En sång på, tigre-spraket’, upptecknad, öfversatt och förklarad af R. Sundstrōm. Utgifven öch ofversatt till tyska af E. Littmann. (Skrifter ulgifna af K. Humanistisha Vetenskaps-Samfundet i Uppsala, VIII, 6.) Uppsala: Akademiska bokhandeln, 1904. (Lt su Sång.)Google Scholar
Sundstrōm, G. R.: ‘Some Tigre texts with transliteration and translation’, Le Monde Oriental (MO), 1914, 1–15. (Tigre texts.)Google Scholar
SV v. Cohen, M.Google Scholar
Tigre texts v. Sundstrōm, G. R.Google Scholar
Traité v. Cohen, M.Google Scholar
Tribù v. Rodén, K. G.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. N., AND Bryan, M. A.: Linguistic analyses: the non-Bantu languages of north-eastern Africa. With a supplement on the Ethiopic languages by W. Leslau. (Handbook of African Languages.) Oxford: University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Ullendorff, E.: ‘What is a Semitic language? A problem of linguistic identification’, Orientalia. XXVII, 1958, 66–75.Google Scholar
Wright, W.: A grammar of the Arabic language, translated from the German of Caspari and edited … by W. Wright. Third edition revised by W. Robertson Smith and M. J. Goeje. Cambridge: University Press, 1896–1898.Google Scholar
Zaborski, A.: ‘Cushitic overview’, in Bender, M. L. (ed.): The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia. 67–84.Google Scholar