Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:50:45.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some etymological notes on two Japanese words—kugutu and ruri

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

C. J. Dunn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As a small token of my gratitude to Professor Walter Simon for the help that he has ungrudgingly given me over many years, I present to him, with some trepidation, some etymological notes on words which I have encountered during work on the Japanese puppet drama. Even so restricted an investigation has obliged me to consult many long-suffering colleagues at SOAS, and I take this opportunity of thanking them and apologizing for not mentioning them individually.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 287 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Masatsugu, Andō. 1919. ‘Kugutsu-meigi-kō’ ‘Thoughts on the name kugutu’, Rekishi Chiri (Tokyo), 03 1919. [Quoted in Tsunods.]Google Scholar
Sang-su, Choe 1961 A study of the Korean puppet play. (Korean Folklore Study Series, No. 4.) Seoul: Korea Books Publishing Co. Ltd. and Korean Folklore Society.Google Scholar
Daniels, F. J. (ed.). [1959.] Selections from Japanese Literature (12th to 19th centuries). London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
Dunn, N. J. 1966. The early Japanese puppet drama. London: Luzae.Google Scholar
Ernout, A., AND Meillst, A. 1951. Dictionnarie étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Iichi, Hirano—. 1959. ‘Kairaishi no kokyō’ ‘The original home of the puppeteers’, in Engekishi-kentyū ‘Studies in theatre history’, II. Tokyo: Daiichi Shobō.Google Scholar
Karlgren, B. 1915–1926. Études sur la phonologie chinoise. (Archivs d'Études Orientales, XV.) Uppsala: K. W. Appelberg; Leyde: Brill.Google Scholar
Shigetoshi, Kawatake 1959. Nihon-engeki-zenshi ‘Complete history of Japanese drama’. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, J. E. 1844–1849. Dictionnaire mongol-russe-français. Kasan: Imprimerie de l'Université.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. 1915. ‘Optical lenses. I. Burning-lenses in China and India’, T'oung Pao, XVI, 2, 169–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhyŏn, Lee [Yi Tu-hyŏn] 1969. Hanguk kamyŏn-gŭk ‘Korean mask-dance drama’, Seoul: Hanguk kamyŏn-gŭk Yŏngu-hoe.Google Scholar
Master, A. 1944. ‘Indo-Aryan and Dravidian’, BSOAS, XI, 2, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippi, D. L. (tr.). 1968. Kojiki. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Pischel, R. 1902. The home of the puppet-play.… Translated by Mildred C. Tawney. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Soothill, W. E., AND Hodous, L. 1937. A dictionary of Chinese Buddhist terms. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ichirō, Tsunoda 1963. Ningyōgeki no seiritsu ni kan-suru kenkyū ‘Studies relating to the establishment of the puppet theatre’. Osaka: Asahiya-Shoten.Google Scholar
Turner, R. L. 1927. The position of Romani in Indo-Aryan. (Gypsy Lore Society. Monographs, No. 4.) London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar