Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-m789k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-11T01:00:25.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quote attributed to Udbhaṭabhaṭṭa, which is actually from Arcaṭa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2025

Krishna Del Toso Open the ORCID record for Krishna Del Toso [Opens in a new window]
Krishna Del Toso*
Affiliation:
Independent scholar, Travesio, Italy
*
Email: [email protected] In loving memory of Ramkrishna Bhattacharya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the basis of textual scrutiny and intertextual comparisons, this study highlights that Vādidevasūri's attribution of a quotation to the Cārvāka/Lokāyata philosopher Udbhaṭabhaṭṭa in the Syādvādaratnākara is, in fact, part of a broader passage sourced from Arcaṭa's Hetubinduṭīkā and, consequently, its expungement from the corpus of source material attributed to the Cārvāka/Lokāyata authors is suggested.

Keywords

CārvākaLokāyataUdbhaṭabhaṭṭaVādidevasūriArcaṭaQuotation identificationSource material analysis
Type
Article
Information
Bulletin of SOAS , First View , pp. 1 - 15
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Arcaṭa, HetubinduṭīkāGoogle Scholar
Sanghavi, Sukhlalji and Jinavijayaji, Muni Shri. 1949. Hetubinduṭīkā of Bhaṭṭa Arcaṭa with the Sub-Commentary Entitled Āloka of Durveka Miśra. Baroda: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Dharmakīrti, HetubinduGoogle Scholar
Steinkellner, Ernst. 2016. Dharmakīrti's Hetubindu: Critically Edited by Ernst Steinkellner on the Basis of Preparatory Work by Helmut Krasser with a Translation of the Gilgit Fragment by Klaus Wille. Beijing and Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House and Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Dharmakīrti, PramāṇavārttikaGoogle Scholar
Miyasaka, Yushō. 1971–72. Pramāṇavarttika-kārikā (Sanskrit and Tibetan), Acta Indologica 2, 1–206.Google Scholar
Durvekamiśra, HetubinduṭīkālokaGoogle Scholar
See: Arcaṭa, Hetubinduṭīkā.Google Scholar
Praśastapāda, PādārthadharmasaṃgrahaGoogle Scholar
Dvivedin, Vindhyesvan Prasad. 1984. The Praśastapāda Bhāṣya with Commentary Nyāyakandali of Sridhara. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.Google Scholar
Śāntarakṣita, TattvasaṃgrahaGoogle Scholar
Kania, Stanisław Jan. 2022. “Tattva-saṅgraha(-pañjikā) VIId Digambara-parikalpitâtma-parīkṣā: Critically edited and translated”, in Marciniak, Katarzyna, Jan Kania, Stanisław, Wielińska-Soltwedel, Małgorzata and Bareja-Starzyńska, Agata (eds), Guruparamparā. Studies on Buddhism, India, Tibet and more in Honour of Professor Marek Mejor. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press, 175–218.Google Scholar
Śāstrī, Dwārikādās. 2006. The Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the “Pañjikā” Commentary of Ācārya Kamalaśīla (vol. 2). Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.Google Scholar
Vādidevasūri, Syādvādaratnākara.Google Scholar
Lādhājī, Motīlāla. 1927. Śrīmadvādidevasūriviracitaḥ Pramāṇanayatattvālokālaṅkāraḥ tadvyākhyā ca Syādvādaratnākaraḥ (vol. 4). Puṇyapattana: Lakṣmaṇ Bhāurāv Kokāṭe.Google Scholar
Balcerowicz, Piotr. 2011. “Dharmakīrti's criticism of the Jaina doctrine of multiplexity of reality (anekāntavāda)”, in Krasser, Helmut, Lasic, Horst, Franco, Eli, and Kellner, Birgit (eds), Religion and Logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Dharmakīrti Conference, Vienna, August 23–27, 2005. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1–31.Google Scholar
Balcerowicz, Piotr. 2015. “Do attempts to formalize the Syād-vāda make sense?”, in Flügel, Peter and Qvarnström, Olle (eds), Jaina Scriptures and Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 181–248.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna. 2002. “Cārvāka fragments: a new collection”, Journal of Indian Philosophy 30, 597–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna. 2009. Studies on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata. Florence: Società Editrice Fiorentina.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, Johannes. 2008. “Udbhaṭa, a grammarian and a Cārvāka”, in Kaul, Mrinal and Aklujkar, Ashok (eds), Linguistic Traditions of Kashmir: Essays in Memory of Paṇḍit Dinanath Yaksha. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld, 281–99.Google Scholar
Del Toso, Krishna. 2021. “Where do those beautiful ladies and wolf's footprints lead us? The Mādhyamikas on two Cārvāka/Lokāyata stanzas [Part 3]”, Annali dell'Università di Napoli “L'Orientale” 81, 123–43.Google Scholar
Del Toso, Krishna. 2023. “Bhāviveka and Avalokitavrata on the two so-called non-cause theories (ahetuvāda) of the Lokāyatikas”, Indo-Iranian Journal 66, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Eli. 2018. “Lokāyata”, in Jacobsen, Knut A. (ed.), Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism Online. Brill. Online: https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/ENHI/COM-9000000072.xml?ebody=article%20detailsGoogle Scholar
Freschi, Elisa. 2010. What do Sacred Texts Teach? Mīmāṃsā Views on Exhortation, Duty, Language, Exegesis and Sacrifice, Including a Critical Edition and Translation of Rāmānujācārya's Tantrarahasya, Śāstraprameyapariccheda. Online: https://www.academia.edu/348760/What_do_Sacred_Texts_teachGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Charles. 2022. The Tattvasaṃgraha of Śāntarakṣita. Selected Metaphysical Chapters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inami, Masahiro. 2020. “Two kinds of causal capacity: sāmānyā śaktiḥ and pratiniyatā śaktiḥ”, in Kellner, Birgit, McAllister, Patrick, Lasic, Horst and McClintock, Sara (eds), Reverberations of Dharmakīrti's Philosophy: Proceedings of the Fifth International Dharmakīrti Conference Heidelberg, August 26 to 30, 2014. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 155–76.Google Scholar
Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi. 2007. Indian Philosophy and the Consequences of Knowledge. Themes in Ethics, Metaphysics and Soteriology. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Sakai, Masamichi. 2010. Dharmottaras Erklärung von Dharmakīrtis kṣaṇikatvānumāna (Pramāṇaviniścayaṭīkā zu Pramāṇaviniścaya 2 vv. 53–55 mit Prosa). PhD dissertation, Universität Wien, Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jaysankar Lal. 2002. “Causality: Sāṃkhya, Bauddha and Nyāya”, Journal of Indian Philosophy 30, 213–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Esther A. 1977–78. “Bhaṭṭa Udbhaṭa”, Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 58–9, 986–7.Google Scholar
Arcaṭa, HetubinduṭīkāGoogle Scholar
Sanghavi, Sukhlalji and Jinavijayaji, Muni Shri. 1949. Hetubinduṭīkā of Bhaṭṭa Arcaṭa with the Sub-Commentary Entitled Āloka of Durveka Miśra. Baroda: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Dharmakīrti, HetubinduGoogle Scholar
Steinkellner, Ernst. 2016. Dharmakīrti's Hetubindu: Critically Edited by Ernst Steinkellner on the Basis of Preparatory Work by Helmut Krasser with a Translation of the Gilgit Fragment by Klaus Wille. Beijing and Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House and Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Dharmakīrti, PramāṇavārttikaGoogle Scholar
Miyasaka, Yushō. 1971–72. Pramāṇavarttika-kārikā (Sanskrit and Tibetan), Acta Indologica 2, 1–206.Google Scholar
Durvekamiśra, HetubinduṭīkālokaGoogle Scholar
See: Arcaṭa, Hetubinduṭīkā.Google Scholar
Praśastapāda, PādārthadharmasaṃgrahaGoogle Scholar
Dvivedin, Vindhyesvan Prasad. 1984. The Praśastapāda Bhāṣya with Commentary Nyāyakandali of Sridhara. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.Google Scholar
Śāntarakṣita, TattvasaṃgrahaGoogle Scholar
Kania, Stanisław Jan. 2022. “Tattva-saṅgraha(-pañjikā) VIId Digambara-parikalpitâtma-parīkṣā: Critically edited and translated”, in Marciniak, Katarzyna, Jan Kania, Stanisław, Wielińska-Soltwedel, Małgorzata and Bareja-Starzyńska, Agata (eds), Guruparamparā. Studies on Buddhism, India, Tibet and more in Honour of Professor Marek Mejor. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press, 175–218.Google Scholar
Śāstrī, Dwārikādās. 2006. The Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the “Pañjikā” Commentary of Ācārya Kamalaśīla (vol. 2). Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.Google Scholar
Vādidevasūri, Syādvādaratnākara.Google Scholar
Lādhājī, Motīlāla. 1927. Śrīmadvādidevasūriviracitaḥ Pramāṇanayatattvālokālaṅkāraḥ tadvyākhyā ca Syādvādaratnākaraḥ (vol. 4). Puṇyapattana: Lakṣmaṇ Bhāurāv Kokāṭe.Google Scholar
Balcerowicz, Piotr. 2011. “Dharmakīrti's criticism of the Jaina doctrine of multiplexity of reality (anekāntavāda)”, in Krasser, Helmut, Lasic, Horst, Franco, Eli, and Kellner, Birgit (eds), Religion and Logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Dharmakīrti Conference, Vienna, August 23–27, 2005. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1–31.Google Scholar
Balcerowicz, Piotr. 2015. “Do attempts to formalize the Syād-vāda make sense?”, in Flügel, Peter and Qvarnström, Olle (eds), Jaina Scriptures and Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 181–248.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna. 2002. “Cārvāka fragments: a new collection”, Journal of Indian Philosophy 30, 597–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna. 2009. Studies on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata. Florence: Società Editrice Fiorentina.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, Johannes. 2008. “Udbhaṭa, a grammarian and a Cārvāka”, in Kaul, Mrinal and Aklujkar, Ashok (eds), Linguistic Traditions of Kashmir: Essays in Memory of Paṇḍit Dinanath Yaksha. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld, 281–99.Google Scholar
Del Toso, Krishna. 2021. “Where do those beautiful ladies and wolf's footprints lead us? The Mādhyamikas on two Cārvāka/Lokāyata stanzas [Part 3]”, Annali dell'Università di Napoli “L'Orientale” 81, 123–43.Google Scholar
Del Toso, Krishna. 2023. “Bhāviveka and Avalokitavrata on the two so-called non-cause theories (ahetuvāda) of the Lokāyatikas”, Indo-Iranian Journal 66, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Eli. 2018. “Lokāyata”, in Jacobsen, Knut A. (ed.), Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism Online. Brill. Online: https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/ENHI/COM-9000000072.xml?ebody=article%20detailsGoogle Scholar
Freschi, Elisa. 2010. What do Sacred Texts Teach? Mīmāṃsā Views on Exhortation, Duty, Language, Exegesis and Sacrifice, Including a Critical Edition and Translation of Rāmānujācārya's Tantrarahasya, Śāstraprameyapariccheda. Online: https://www.academia.edu/348760/What_do_Sacred_Texts_teachGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Charles. 2022. The Tattvasaṃgraha of Śāntarakṣita. Selected Metaphysical Chapters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inami, Masahiro. 2020. “Two kinds of causal capacity: sāmānyā śaktiḥ and pratiniyatā śaktiḥ”, in Kellner, Birgit, McAllister, Patrick, Lasic, Horst and McClintock, Sara (eds), Reverberations of Dharmakīrti's Philosophy: Proceedings of the Fifth International Dharmakīrti Conference Heidelberg, August 26 to 30, 2014. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 155–76.Google Scholar
Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi. 2007. Indian Philosophy and the Consequences of Knowledge. Themes in Ethics, Metaphysics and Soteriology. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Sakai, Masamichi. 2010. Dharmottaras Erklärung von Dharmakīrtis kṣaṇikatvānumāna (Pramāṇaviniścayaṭīkā zu Pramāṇaviniścaya 2 vv. 53–55 mit Prosa). PhD dissertation, Universität Wien, Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jaysankar Lal. 2002. “Causality: Sāṃkhya, Bauddha and Nyāya”, Journal of Indian Philosophy 30, 213–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Esther A. 1977–78. “Bhaṭṭa Udbhaṭa”, Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 58–9, 986–7.Google Scholar