Article contents
The Pilgrimage and Death of Sākūra, King of Mali
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
Extract
It is recorded in a number of standard works on the western Sudan and northern Nigeria that about the year A.D. 1300 Sākūra, the usurping King of Mali, performed the pilgrimage to Mecca and was murdered by the Danakil on the return journey. Delafosse writes: ‘C'est en revenant des lieux-saints par le Yémen et l'Erythrée, vers l'an 1300, que Sakoura trouva la mort: il fut dévalisé et assassiné par des Danakil sur la côte de Tadjourah, comme il venait de débarquer sur la terre d'Afrique.’ Meek, de Pedrals, and Bovill give the same story, and the last-named comments: ‘He was not returning by the customary route through Cairo, but through Eritrea and the Eastern Sudan, following what has now become the great pilgrim road of West-Central Africa.’ Now if Sākūra was killed in what is to-day French Somaliland, or for that matter anywhere in Somali or Dankali country, he was far to the south of ‘the great pilgrim road’, which does not cross Eritrea at all. Nor is it conceivable that it should ever have done so. It goes through Bornu, Wadai, and Darfur to the Nile and now reaches the Red Sea at Port Sudan. There is no reason why pilgrims should have gone so far to the south of the latitude of Jidda and so have given themselves the task of climbing over the Abyssinian plateau which was, moreover, in Christian hands. A glance at the map will show what a very strange route Sākūra is alleged to have chosen. Having landed at Tajura he would have had three alternatives. The first was to follow approximately the line of the modern railway to Addis Ababa, climbing the steep escarpment in Shoa, and then making his way across Ethiopia and down the other side of the plateau to the Nile valley in Sennar, whence he could have reached Darfur. This would have been very difficult for topographical reasons and would have necessitated a long journey through Christian territory. The second possibility was to travel northwards along the coast until he reached a place such as Suakin where he could have turned westwards and headed for the Nile. This would have been even more difficult, given the character of the Danakil and their country. Last and most difficult of all, he could have attempted the little-used and circuitous route that led through the Sidama States, on the southern borders of Ethiopia, to the White Nile. It is almost inconceivable that he should have been trying to do any of these things.
- Type
- Notes and Communications
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1953 , pp. 391 - 392
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1953
References
page 391 note 1 Haut-Sénégal-Niger, tom. 2, p. 186.Google Scholar
page 391 note 2 The Northern Tribes of Nigeria, vol. 1, p. 63.Google Scholar
page 391 note 3 Manuel scieniifique de l'Afrique Noire, p. 153.Google Scholar
page 391 note 4 Caravans of the Old Sahara, p. 71.Google Scholar M. R. Mauny, of the Institut Français d'Afrique Noire has drawn my attention to an almost identical statement by Westermann, D., Geschichte Afrikas, Staatenbildungen südlich der Sahara, p. 78.Google Scholar
page 391 note 5 Delafosse, who is followed by Meek, relates that after the murder, Sākūra's companions dried his body, which they carried with them as far as Bornu, where it was left until a special embassy came from Mali to retrieve it. He quotes no authority for this story and I have failed to find one. M. Mauny has also been unable to trace its origin and tells me that he considers that Delafosse ‘a tout simplement émis une hypothèse, plausible d'ailleurs’. If the returning pilgrims were encumbered by a desiccated corpse their journey from Somaliland to Nigeria was even more remarkable.
page 392 note 1 Maqrīzī mentions Sākūra's pilgrimage in his essay on the pilgrimages of Caliphs and Kings, (Camb. Univ. MSS. Qq 1411 f. 34r., and Add. 7464 f. 103v.). There is a MS. in the Bibliothèque Nationale which seems to be the same work, and M. Gaudefroy-Demombynes has translated the relevant passage in his version of the African portions of the Masālik al-abṣār of Ibn Faḍlallāh al-'Umarī, p. 89. Maqrīzī, however, does not mention Sākūra's murder.
page 392 note 2 Būlāq, edition, vol. 6, p. 200, 1. 18.Google Scholar
page 392 note 3 Rodd, F. R., People of the Veil, p. 318.Google Scholar
page 392 note 4 Mansa Mūsā.
page 392 note 5 Brunschvig, R., La Berberie orientale sous les Hafsides, tom. 1, p. 321Google Scholar, evidently following al-Tīānī.
- 1
- Cited by