No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
The admirable article by Drijvers is a significant contribution to the study of early Syriac texts and certainly calls for further analysis. In the decipherment of lapidary texts the overriding factor is, of course, the script; and, fortunately, monumental Syriac script conforms to a fairly uniform pattern of development. The comments that follow are based principally on epigraphic considerations.
1 Drijvers, H. J. W., ‘Some new Syriac inscriptions and archaeological finds from Edessa and Sumatar Harabesi’, BSOAS, XXXVI, 1, 1973, 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 BSOAS, XVI, 1, 1954, 16Google Scholar.
3 ibid., 17, 23, 24 (No. 11), 26.
4 See para. 2, above.
5 BSOAS, XVI, 1, 1954, 21Google Scholar.
6 ibid., 24 (No. 11), 26.
7 ibid., 24 (No. 11).