Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:34:44.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on split ergativity in Burushaski1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Étienne Tiffou  and
Yves-Charles Morin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his pioneer work on the Burushaski language, Lorimer (1935a:64) noted the existence of what has been later described as an ergative construction: the subject of a transitive verb is in the ergative case (a special case, usually marked by the suffix-e) while the subject of inttransitive verbs, as well as the object of transitive verbs, are in the absolutive case (morphologically unmarked) as appears in the examples 1(a)-(c) below:

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 88 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berger, Hermann 1974. Das Yasin Burushaski. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Berger, Hermann (forthcoming). Das Hunza BurushaskiGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. ‘Ergativity’. Language, LV, 1, 59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, D. L. R. 1935a. The Burushaski language. I: Introduction and grammar. Oslo: H. Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Lorimer, D. L. R. 1935b. The Burushaski language. II: Texts and translations. Oslo: H. Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Lorimer, D. L. R. 1938. The Burushaski language. III: vocabularies and index. Oslo: H. Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Melčuk, Igor. 1978. ‘Towards a definition of the concept “ergative construction”’, in Dressler, W., and Meid, W. (ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth International Congress of Linguists. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachenwissenschaft.) Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachenwissenchaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. ‘Hierarchy of features and ergativity’, in Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Tiffou, Étienne 1977. ‘Ľeffacement de ĺergatif en bourouchaski’, Studia Linguistica, XXI, 1, 18–37.Google Scholar
Tiffou, Étienne and Jürgen Pesot (forthcoming). Études linguistiques sur le bourouchaski du Yasin.Google Scholar
Wagner, H. 1978. ‘The typological background of the ergative construction’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (Dublin), LXXVIII, C, 3:37–74.Google Scholar