Article contents
The Neolithic Stone Industry of the santal Parganas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
Extract
In a previous paper I discussed the typology of two collections of neolithic artifacts from the North Karnataka of India and discovered a close correspondence between them.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 1962 , pp. 306 - 330
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1962
References
page 306 note 1 ‘The neolithic stone industry of the North Karnataka region’, BSOAS, xix, 2, 1957, 321Google Scholar–35.
page 306 note 2 Allchin, F. R., Piklihal excavations, Hyderabad, 1960, 85–95Google Scholar.
page 306 note 3 JASB, LXX, Pt. III, 1901, 17–22Google Scholar; JASB, LXXIII, Pt. III, 1904, 27–Google Scholar.
page 307 note 1 See Bodding's, Traditions and institutions of the Santals, Oslo, 1942, 3–22Google Scholar.
page 308 note 1 Dani, A. H., Prehistory and protohistory of eastern India, Calcutta, 1960, 85–104Google Scholar. I should like to acknowledge the use I have made of Dr. Dani's work in this paper, particularly in reference to the Assamese and South East Asian distributions of certain types.
page 310 note 1 Allchin, B., ‘The Indian middle stone age; some new sites in central and southern India’,Bull, of Institute of Archaeology, 2, 1959, 11Google Scholar.
page 311 note 1 Allchin, F. R., BSOAS, xix, 2, 1357, 328Google Scholar.
page 312 note 1 Dani, op. cit., 47–8.
page 314 note 1 cf. Allchin, F. R., BSOAS, xix, 2, 1957Google Scholar, fig. 1, no. 6; fig. 3, nos. 23, 24, 26.
page 318 note 1 Allchin, F. E., BSOAS, xix, 2, 1957, fig. 4, nos. 37, 40–41Google Scholar; and Subbarao, B., Stone Age cultures of Bellary,1948, pi. xxIII, 1–12Google Scholar.
page 323 note 1 Dani, op. cit., 1960, 91–100.
page 324 note 1 Allchin, F. R., BSOAS. xix, 2, 1957Google Scholar, fig. 4, no. 38.
page 325 note 1 Burkitt, M. C. and Cammiade, L. A., ‘Fresh light on the stone ages in southeast India’, Antiquity iv, 15, 1930, 327Google Scholar–39.
page 325 note 2 These were discovered by Dr. R. D. Ghosh of the Ashutosh Museum, Calcutta, and were noted during my visit to the Museum in 1951, being hitherto unpublished.
page 326 note 1 Walsh, , JASB, LXXIII, Pt. in, 1904, 20Google Scholar–4.
page 326 note 1 Anderson, J., Report on the expedition to western Yunnan, via Bhamo, Calcutta, 1871, App. C, 410Google Scholar–15.
page 326 note 3 No. 5 of Anderson's note; and Dr. Dani's pi. 18, no. 14.
page 327 note 1 Anderson, C. W., ‘Note on prehistoric stone implements found in the Singhbhum district’, JBORS, III, 3, 1917, 349Google Scholar–62.
page 328 note 1 Dani, op. cit., 1960, 88–9.
page 328 note 2 Sen, D., ‘A celt-site in Singbhum’, Man in India, xxx, 1, 1950, 1–12Google Scholar.
page 328 note 3 Ray, G. S., ‘Microlithic industry of Bongara, Manbhum’, Man in India, xxxiv, 1, 1954, 16–19Google Scholar.
page 328 note 4 Goswami, K. G., Excavations at Bangarh, 1948, 32Google Scholar.
page 329 note 1 Indian Archaeology, 1954–55, a review, 19–20Google Scholar.
page 329 note 2 Indian Archaeology, 1956–57, a review, 19–20Google Scholarand pi. xxvb.
- 1
- Cited by