Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:25:01.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative and non-assertive in Contemporary Hebrew1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Lewis Glinert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is a syntactic-semantic study of negative and non-assertive environments in Contemporary (Israeli) Hebrew (henceforth CH), with particular reference to the determiners and pro-forms specific to them. These are illustrated by the non-italicized forms in 1–3 below:

By ‘non-assertive environments’, I mean incomplete negation (as with Enghlish ‘hardly, few’), implied negation (as with ‘reluctant, hard’), questions and conditionals. In English, these environments all allow a similar use of ‘any, anyone’ and suchlike, e.g. ‘I hardly saw anyone, it's hard to persude anyone, did any stock go? The concept ‘non-assertive’ has been described for English by Quirk et al (1972:53), Klima (1964)—he uses ‘affective’—and others.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , October 1982 , pp. 434 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, L.H.‘Some aspects of negation in English and Baghdad Arabic’, Archivam Linguisticum, New Series, I, 1970, 67–83Google Scholar
Ali, L.H.‘Observations on the preverb negative particle ma in Baghdad Arabic’ Studia Linguistica, XXVI, 2, 1972, 48–60Google Scholar
M, Azar. Šetac va-'omek be-taxbir [Surface and depth in syntax], Haifa, Haifa University Press, 1977Google Scholar
Berman, R.Aronson, Modern Herbrew structure, Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects, 1978Google Scholar
H, Blance. ‘The Israeli koine as and emergent national standard’ (ed.)Fisherman, J. A et al., in Language problems of developing nations. Somerset, N. J.:Wiley, 1968Google Scholar
Chayen, M. J., and Dror, Z. Introduction to Hebrew transformational grammar. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects,1976Google Scholar
A, Davison. ‘Negative scope and rules of conversation: evidence from an OV language’, in (ed.) Cole, P, Syntax and semantics, 9, Pragmatics. New York: Seminar Press, 1978Google Scholar
A, Davison. ‘Any as universal or existential ?’, (ed.) van der Auwera, J, in The semantics of determiners. London: Croom Helm, 1980Google Scholar
C, Fillmore.‘On the syntax of preverbs’, Glossa, I, 2, 1967Google Scholar
Glinert, L. H. ‘How od: a study of a Modern Hebrew pseudoquantiiier’, in (ed.) Cole, P, Studies in Modern Hebrew syntax and semantics. (North-Holland Linguistics Series, 32.) Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976Google Scholar
Glinert, L. H. ‘Number switch: a singular feature-change rule in Modern Hebrew’, Afroasiatic Linguistics, IV, 2, 1977, 1–38Google Scholar
Glinert, L. H. ‘kamatim ve-taviyot 'ivriyim be-hora'at safa Šniya’ [Hebrew quantifiers and determiners in second language teaching], Orachot, x, 1977, 36–46Google Scholar
Glinert, L. H. ‘cerufey Šem “clalim” ba-‘ivrit ha-meduberet’ [‘ Shadow noun phrases ’ in Spoken Hebrew], Hebrew Computational Linguistics, XIII, 1978, 28–69Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. ‘On the semantic properties of logical operators in English’, UCLA Ph.D. thesis, reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1972Google Scholar
E, Klima. ‘Negation in English’, in (ed.) Fodor, J. A and Katz, J. A., Structure of language. Englewood Cliffs Prentice-Hall:, 1964Google Scholar
G, Lakoff. ‘A note on vagueness and ambiguity’, Linguistic inquiry, I 3, 1970, 357‘8Google Scholar
Levenston, E. A. English for Israelis. Jerusalem: Israeli Universities Press, 1970Google Scholar
Z, Malisdorf. ‘Sentential complements in Hebrew’, Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York, 1975Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. Word and object (Studies in Communication). New York and London: Technology Press of M. I. T., 1960Google Scholar
R, Quirk. el al. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman, 1972Google Scholar
R, Quirk. and S, Greenbaum. A university grammar of English. Harlow: Longman, 1973Google Scholar
C, Rabin. ‘le-xeker ha-'ivrit ha-sifrutit ha-xadaŠa [On the study of modern literary Hebrew]’, LeŠonenu, XXII, 1958, 246–57Google Scholar
V, Raskin. ‘Determination with and without articles’, (ed.) J, van der Auwera, in The semantics of determiners. London: Croom Helm, 1980Google Scholar
Rosén, H. B. ‘tahalixey lašon’ [Linguistic processes], LeŠonenu la-'am, III, 25, 1952Google Scholar
Rosén, H. B. A textbook of Israeli Hebrew. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962Google Scholar
Rosén, H. B. Contemporary Hebrew. The Hague:Mouton, 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Y, Sadka. taxbir ha-'ivrit be-yamenu [Contemporary Hebrew syntax], Jerusalem: Kirjat-Sefer, 1981Google Scholar
Z, Vendler. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967Google Scholar
A, Zilkha.‘Negation in Hebrew’, Ph.D. thesis,University of Texas at Austin, 1970Google Scholar