Article contents
The Mīm, the ՙAyn, and the making of Ismāՙīlism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Extract
The ՙAlbāުiyya are the followers of al-ՙAlbā՚ b. Dhira՚ al-Dawsī, who set ՙAlī above the Prophet, saying that Muḥammad had been sent by ՙAlī, whom he called a divine being. … Some believe in the divinity of both ՙAlī and Muḣammad, but still think ՙAlī superior; these are called the ՙAyniyya. Others who think them both divine put Muḣammad first; these are called the Mīmiyya. Yet others believe in the divinity of all five Companions of the Cloak, Muḣammad, ՙAlī, Fāṭima, Ḥasan and Ḥusayn, as equally imbued with the spirit of God.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 25 - 39
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1994
References
1 Al-Shahrastānī, , Kitāb al-Milal waՙl-niḥal (Cairo, 1968), I, 175;Google ScholarBook I, ‘Muslim sects’, tr. Kazi, A. K. and Flynn, J. G., Muslim sects and divisions (London, 1984), 151–2;Google Scholartr. Gimaret, D. and Monnot, G., Livre des religions el des sectes, I (Louvain, 1986), 513–14Google Scholar.
2 cf. Massignon, L., The Passion of al-Hallaj, mystic and martyr of Islam, tr. Mason, H., 4 vols. (Princeton, 1982), I, 300;Google Scholaridem, Salmân Pâk et les prémices spirituelles de I'Islam iranien (Tours, 1934). 36–7Google Scholar.
3 Corbin, H., Cyclical time and lsmaili gnosis, tr. Manheim, R. and Morris, J. W. (London, 1983). 125–6, 157Google Scholar.
4 Corbin, Cyclical time, 125, 90–1Google Scholar.
5 cf. Young, M. J. L., Latham, J. D. and Sergeant, R. B. (ed.), The Cambridge history of Arabic literature: religion, learning and science in the ՙAbbasid period (Cambridge, 1990), 333–4Google Scholar.
6 Shahrastānī, , Livre des religions et des sectes, tr. Gimaret, and Monnot, , p. 514, n. 47Google Scholar.
7 Massignon, Salmân Pâk, 37–9Google Scholar.
8 Massignon, Passion of al-Ḥallāj, I, 249, 310Google Scholar.
9 ibid., 200–4.
10 ibid..
11 ibid.., 310, 416.
12 ibid.., 310.
13 Halm, H., Kosmologie und Heilslehre der frühen Ismāՙīlīya (Wiesbaden, 1978), 142–68Google Scholar.
14 Saՙd b. ՙAbd Allah, al-Ashՙārī, al-Qummī, Kitāb al-Maqālāt wa՚l-firāq, ed. Mashkour, M. J. (Tehran, 1963)Google Scholar.
15 Livre des religions, pp. 513–14, nn. 43,49Google Scholar.
16 Al-Qummī, Maqālāt, 56–60;Google Scholartr. Halm, Kosmologie, 157–61Google Scholar.
17 Thus contradicting the opinion of the translator of the text: Halm, , Kosmologie, 142–56; Filippano-Ronconi, P. (tr.), Ummu ՚l-Kitāb (Naples, 1966)Google Scholar.
18 Shorter encyclopaedia of Islam, s.v. ‘Nusairi’Google Scholar.
19 Halm, Kosmologie, 165–7Google Scholar.
20 Articles collected in Stern, S. M., Studies in early Ismaՙilism (Jerusalem and Leiden, 1983)Google Scholar.
21 cf. e.g. Madelung, W., ‘Das Imamat in der frühe ismailitischen Lehre’, Der Islam, 37, 1961, 43–135;Google Scholar‘Fatimiden und Bahrainqarmaten’, Der Islam, 34, 1959, 34–88; art. ‘Ismāՙīliyya’, EI (2nd ed.)Google Scholar.
22 cf., most recently, Daftary, F., The Ismaՙīlīs: their history and doctrines (Cambridge, 1990,) 103–36;Google Scholaridem, ՙThe earliest Ismāՙīlīs', , Arabica, 38, 1991, 214–45;Google Scholaridem, ‘A major schism in the early Ismāՙīlī movement’, Studia Islamica, 57, 1993, 123–39Google Scholar. Halm, H., Das Reich des Mahdi: der Aufsleig der Fatimiden (Munich, 1991), 15–132Google Scholar.
23 Commonly but wrongly called ՙUbayd AllāhGoogle Scholar.
24 For references see Daftary, Ismāՙīlīs, 106, 109Google Scholar.
25 The information derives from the two distinct versions of Ibn Ḥawqal's work, al-Masālik wa՚l-mamālik, ed. Goeje, M. J. de (Leiden, 1873), 210Google Scholar, and Ṣūral al-arḍ, ed. Kramers, J. H., 2 vols. (Leiden, 1938–1939), 295;Google ScholarConfiguration de la terre tr. Wiet, G., 2 vols.(Beirut and Paris, 1964)Google Scholar.
26 Kitābu ՚l-kashf of Jaՙfar b. Mansūri ՚l-Yaman, ed. Strothmann, R. (London, New York, Bombay, 1952), 98–9Google Scholar.
27 Madelung, ‘Imamat’, 59–61; p. 63 n. 117Google Scholar.
28 cf. Hamdani, A. and Blois, F. de, ‘A re-examination of al-Mahdi's letter to the Yemenites on the genealogy of the Fatimid Caliphs’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1983, 173–207; see pp. 176, 191Google Scholar.
29 Al-Nawbakhtī, Firaq al-Shīՙa, ed. Ritter, H., Die Sekten der Schiՙa (Istanbul, 1931), 61–4;Google Scholartr. Mashkour, M. J., Les sectes shiites, 2nd ed. (Tehran, 1980), 86–91;Google Scholaral-Qummī, Maqālāt, 83–6Google Scholar.
30 Translated or summarized in Ivanow, W., Studies in early Persian Ismailism, 2nd ed. (Bombay, 1955), chs. ii–iv;Google Scholar text of Kitāb al-Rushd in Husayn, M. K. (ed.), Collectanea, I (Leiden, The Ismaili Society, 1948), 185–213;Google Scholarcf. Poonawala, I. K., Biobibliography of Ismāՙīli literature (Malibu, California 1977), 34, 74Google Scholar.
31 cf. Massignon, Passion I, 202–3Google Scholar.
32 Ivanow, Studies, 107.Google Scholar
33 Kitāb al-Kashf, 15–16.Google Scholar
34 ibid., 14.
35 Halm, Kosmologie, 25, ref. Kitāb al-Kashf, 104; 28, refGoogle Scholar. ibid., 14.
36 cf. EI (2nd ed.), s. v., ‘Ḥudjdja’; Kitāb al-ՙālim, Ivanow, Studies, 93–4.Google Scholar
37 Kitāb al-Kashf, 97.Google Scholar
38 ibid.
39 cf. Madelung, ‘Imamat’, 61–2; Kitāb al-Kashf, 14, et passim.Google Scholar
40 Kitāb al-Kashf, 98.Google Scholar
41 ibid., 99.
42 A1-Qāḍī al-Nuՙmān, If titāḥ al-daՙwa wa ibtidā՚ al-dawla, ed. al-Qāḍī, W.; (Beirut, 1970;) F. Dachraoui (Tunis, 1975), the edition to which subsequent references are made.Google Scholar
43 Iftitāḥ, 115, text 250.Google Scholar
44 ibid., 281–2.
45 Kitāb al-Kashf, 101.Google Scholar
46 Hamdani and de Blois, ‘A re-examination’, 176.Google Scholar
47 ibid.
48 ibid., 201–2.
49 Iftitāḥ, 127–8, text 293–4.
50 ibid., 114, text 249–50.
51 ibid., 131–4, text 306–19.
52 See above, n. 18.
53 cf. Halm, Reich des Mahdi, 67–86, following Ivanow, W., Isma՚ili tradition concerning the rise of the Fatimids (London, New York, etc. 1942), 76–94,Google Scholar following the Istitār al-Imām, transl. Rise, 163–82, text, ed. Ivanow, , Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts Egyptian University, Cairo, 4, 1936, 96–106, in which the name of Zikrawayh does not appear.Google Scholar
54 Iftitāḥ, 47–8, text 30–4.
55 Iftitah, 136, text 324; cf. Madelung, ‘Imamat’, 65ff,.
56 cf. EI (2nd ed.), s.v. ‘Kā՚im Āl Muḥammad'; ‘al-Mahdī’; arts. Madelung. The prophecy that the Mahdī would bear the name of the Prophet goes back to the seventh century.
57 Hamdani and de Blois, ‘A re-examination’, 177.Google Scholar
58 ibid., 177–8.
59 cf. Crone, P. and Hinds, M., God's Caliph (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
60 See above, nn. 3,4.
61 See above, at n. 10.
62 Iftitāḥ, 126, text 287.
63 Idrīs ՙImād al-Dīn, ՙUyūn al-akhbār, v, Ta՚rīkh al-Khulqfā՚ al-fāṭimiyyīn bi՚l-Maghrib, ed. Yalaoui, M. (Beirut, 1985), 226.Google Scholar
64 Al-Qāḍī al-Nuՙmān, al-Urjūzat al-mukhtārah, ed. Poonawala, I. K. (Montreal, 1970), 196–7.Google Scholar
65 cf. e.g. Ibn Khallikān, Wafayāt al-aՙyān (Beirut, 1968), III, 82 (biography of Ibn Ṭabāṭaba, no. 342)Google Scholar; Lewis, B., ‘An interpretation of Fatimid history’, Colloque internationale sur I'histoire du Caire (1969), (Cairo, 1972), 287.Google Scholar
66 Hāni՚, Ibn, Dīwān (Beirut, 1952), 88, 92; Idrīs ՙImād al-Dīn, Ta՚rīkh al-Khulafā՚ al-fāṭimiyyīn, 408.Google Scholar
67 Idrīs ՙImād al-Dīn, Tar՚īkh al-Khulafā՚, 686; cf. S. D. Goitein, ‘The origin of the vizierate and its true character’, Islamic Culture, 16, 1942, 255–62, 380–92.Google Scholar
68 Reich des Mahdi, 148.Google Scholar
69 cf. Stern, S. M. ‘Heterodox Ismāՙīlism in the time of al-Muՙizz’, BSOAS, xvii, 1, 1955, 10–30; Halm, Reich des Mahdi, 334–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70 cf. Madelung, ‘Imamat’, 86–101.
71 Urjūza, 11.1865–7, pp. 191–2.
72 Conspicuously represented by the post-Fāṭimid Ismāՙīlī historian Idrīs ՙImād al-Dīn, ՙUyūn al-akhbār, IV, ed. Ghalib, M. (Beirut, 1973), 351–404.Google Scholar
73 Full references in Daftary, Ismāՙīlīs, p. 109, n. 93.Google Scholar
74 Mamour, P. H.Polemics on the origin of the Fatimi Caliphs (London, 1934).Google Scholar
75 Mamour, Polemics; Ivanow, Rise.Google Scholar
76 Lewis, B., The origins of Ismaՙilism (Cambridge, 1940).Google Scholar
77 Stern, ‘Ismāՙīlīs and Qarmaṭians’, L'élaboration de IՙIslam (Paris, 1961), 99–108, reprinted in idem, Studies in early Ismā՚īlism (Jerusalem and Leiden), 1983.Google Scholar
78 Halm, H. ‘Les fatimides à Salamya’, Revue des Etudes Islamiques, LIV, 1986, 133–49; Reich des Mahdi, 21–4.Google Scholar
79 Text and transl. in Ivanow, Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts and Rise; see above, n. 53.Google Scholar
80 Halm, Reich des Mahdi, 67–86; see above, n. 53.Google Scholar
81 Prophecy of the coming of the Mahdi: Iftitāḥ, text 65.Google Scholar
82 cf. Madelung, ‘Imamat’, 106–11; Halm, Reich des Mahdi, 335–7.Google Scholar
83 cf. Blois, F. de, ‘The Abu Saՙīdīs or so-called ”Qarmaṭians“ of Bahrayn’, xvi, 1986, 13–21.Google Scholar
84 Al-Maqrīzī, Ittiՙāẓ al-hunafā’, ed. l, al-Shayyā and Aḥmad, 3 vols. (Cairo, 1967–1973), I, 189–201.Google Scholar
85 ibid., 194–8.
86 Shahrastānī, Livre des religions et des sectes, 108; Introduction, 31–66.
87 ibid., 550–65; Milal.
88 cf. Fierro, M. I. ‘Some observations on the term al-fāṭimiyyūn’ 5th International Colloquium, ‘From Jahiliyya to Islam’, Jerusalem, 1990.Google Scholar
89 Halm, Kosmologie, 142–68.Google Scholar
90 ibid., 167–8.
- 5
- Cited by