^{page 19 note 1} Ueber die Siṅhâsanadvâtriṅçikâ, Indische Studien, vol. 15.

^{page 19 note 2} Vikrama's Adventures, Harvard Oriental Series, vol. 26 (Translation) and 27 (Text).

^{page 19 note 3} In the variants given, W and E denote the text adopted by Weber and Edgerton respectively.

^{page 20 note 1} The form gauṃ adopted by Edgerton is grammatically impossible and a mere misreading for gao (i.e. !).

^{page 20 note 2} MS.: sūnā°°seviyai (i.e. °!).

^{page 21 note 1} A man who has visited the king “wearing very handsome garments” returns the next day “with dejected countenance and wearing only a loincloth made of old, tattered rags; and being askt the reason by the king, he said: ‘Noble sir, why do you ask ? I am a gambler, and in playing to-day I have lost all, and have come hither, fearing the necessity of giving up something else (kiṃciddeyabhayena). For: (follows the stanza).’”

^{page 23 note 1} That such an archetypus did exist will be shown in my book on the Vasudevahiṇḍi.

^{page 23 note 2} By the omission of the only (without the ā-mātrā) becomes i.e. sāsovile, which explains the reading of one group of MSS.