Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:51:31.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammatical gender in New Azari dialects of Šāhrūd*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2017

Aharon Vardanian
Aharon Vardanian*
Affiliation:
Yerevan State University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unlike some other New Azari dialects1 (Kalāsurī, Harzandī,2 etc.), Šāhrūdī3 preserves grammatical gender, which is reflected in nouns and sporadically in adjectives, pronouns and the verbal system. In this regard Šāhrūdī is similar to the Tākestānī dialects, in which the opposition of feminine and masculine is also attested in nominal, adjectival, pronominal and verbal systems (Yarshater 1969a: 198–9). In the Šāhrūd dialect group there is no gender marker for masculine, except for the 3rd person singular of the present tense of the auxiliary verb.

Keywords

Iranian dialectologyTati studiesTati grammarTati etymologiesTati lexiconComparative linguistics
Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , October 2016 , pp. 503 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS, University of London 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaev, Vasilij I. 1973. Istoriko-etimologičeskij slovar osetinskogo yazyka. Moscow and Leningrad: USSR Academic Press.Google Scholar
Asatrian, Garnik and Livshits, Vladimir. 1994. “Origine du système consonantique de la langue kurde”, Acta Kurdica 1, 81–109.Google Scholar
Horn, Paul. 1893. Grundriss der neupersischen Etymologie. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Lecoq, Pierre. 1989. “Les dialectes caspiens est les dialectes du nord-ouest de l'Iran”, in Schmitt, Rüdiger (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Mann, Oskar and Hadank, Karl. 1932. Mundarten der Zāzā: Hauptsächlich aus Siwerek und Kor. Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Kommission bei Walter de Gruyter and Co.Google Scholar
Miller, Boris V. 1953. Talyšskij yazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1973. Irano-Dardica. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
OIYA. 1991. Osnovy Iranskogo Yazykoznaniya, Novoiranskie yazyki, severo-zapadnaya gruppa, vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern and Munich: Francke.Google Scholar
Tonoyan, A. 2015. “Kovkasyan parskereni mi k’ani baṙi stugabanakan k'nnutyun”, Banber Yerevani Hamalsarani, 1/16, 73–80.Google Scholar
Voskanian, Vardan. 2010–11. “ Norazariakan lezuneri K'alasuri barbaṙaxumbǝ ”, Iran-Name 42–3, 49–52. Yerevan: Caucasian Center for Iranian Studies.Google Scholar
Yarshater, Ehsan. 1960. “The Tāti dialect of Kajal”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 23/2, 275–86.Google Scholar
Yarshater, Ehsan. 1969a. A Grammar of Southern Tati Dialects. Paris: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Yarshater, Ehsan. 1969b, “Distinction of the feminine gender in Southern Tāti”, Studia Classica et Orientalia Antonino Parliaro Oblata III, 281–301.Google Scholar