Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T23:29:14.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Golok Dialect and Written Tibetan past-tense verb forms1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

Tibetan orthography looks phonetically challenging, to say the least; and one may well wonder whether such tongue-twisting combinations as the brj of brjes, the blt- of bltas, or the bst- of bstan ever did twist a Tibetan tongue, or whether the significance of these and other such orthographic forms might not have been morphophonemic in origin, with the letters r, l, and s in the syllable initial of forms such as these serving to associate these past-tense forms lexically with their corresponding present-tense forms; e.g. Viewed in relation to Tibetan orthography the past-tense forms of a class of verbs in the Golok dialect seem to support this hypothesis. Table 1, below, contains a number of examples of Golok verbs in their past-tense and present-tense forms to illustrate a type of phonological analysis suited to that view of the r syllable-initial unit in the Golok examples, and, indirectly, in the WT examples too (the symbols b and b will be accounted for in section (B) below).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jaschke, H. A. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Trübner. [Reprinted London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1934.]Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. A. 1972. The Loloish tonal split revisited. (Research Monograph No. 7.) Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Ray, P. S. 1965. ‘Kham phonology’, JAOS, LXXXV, 3, 336–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1968. ‘The role of R in the development of the modern spoken Tibetan dialects’, Acta Orientalia Hungarica, XXI, 3, 301–11.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1972. ‘A polysystemic approach, in Proto-Tibetan reconstruction, to tone and syllable-initial consonant clusters’, BSOAS, XXXV, 3, 546–87.Google Scholar
Yu, T., AND Chao, Y. R. (ed. and tr.). 1930. Love songs of the sixth Dalai Lama Tshangsdbyangs = rgya-mtsho. (Academia Sinica Monographs, Ser. A, No. 5.) Peiping: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar