Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:16:42.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ergebnisse Der Königlichen Preussischen Turfan-Expeditionen. Die Buddhistische Spätantike in Mittelasien von A. Von Le Coq. Erster Teil: Die Plastik, Berlin1922. Zweiter Teil: Die Manichäischen Miniaturen, Berlin, 1923.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews of Books
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Of which some are published by Mr. Ashton in his recent work, The Study of Chinese Sculpture.

1 See Laufer, , Prolegomena on the History of Defensive Armor, p. 273Google Scholar. The particular type of armour upon which Herr von Le Coq is here commenting seems to be “scale” armour (using the word in Laufer's sense). This was, according to Herodotus, vii, 61, in use among the ancient Persians. The other variety of metal armour, chain-mail, was known in Iranian lands centuries before the Gandharan period. Cf. Laufer, , loc. cit.Google Scholar