Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:08:03.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dental and Alveolar Nasals in Dravidian1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

Burrow and Emeneau (1961, p. xiii, n. 3) have observed that ‘Ta. and Ma. seem to have evidence for two phonemes [/n/, the dental and /ṉ/, the alveolar]a in PDr., but the matter is not yet clear’. This is mainly due to the non-availability of data about the distribution of these phonemes in those two languages and the allophonic distribution, if any, in other languages. With the help of increased material available now, an attempt is made in this paper to find out the history of the development of the two nasal phonemes in Ta. and Ma. and to establish their allophonic nature in PDr. Since definite information about the phonetic nature of the phoneme /n/ is not available for languages such as Kui, Parji, Nk. [Ch.] etc., this study is incomplete to some extent.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, A. S. 1967. Halakki Kannada, Poona.Google Scholar
Agesthialingom, S., and Shanmugam, S. V. 1970. The language of Tamil inscriptions, 1250–1350 A.D. (AUDLP, 23), Annamalainagar.Google Scholar
Andronov, M. 1969. A standard grammar of modern and classical Tamil, Madras.Google Scholar
Arunachalam, P. 1968. History of Tamil syntax—the period of Tolkaippiyam and Sangam (unpublished—thesis submitted to Annamalai University).Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. 1967. Descriptive analysis of Tulu, Poona.Google Scholar
Biligiri, H. S. 1955. ‘The nasal phonemes of Kannada’, IL, xvi, 306–8.Google Scholar
Bray, D. 1909. The Brahui language, I, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Bright, W. 1958. An outline of colloquial Kannada, Poona.Google Scholar
Burrow, T. 1968. Collected papers on Dravidian linguistics (AUDLP, 13), Annamalainagar.Google Scholar
Burrow, T., and Emeneau, M. B. 1961. A Dravidian etymological dictionary, Oxford. (DED)Google Scholar
Burrow, T., and Emeneau, M. B. 1968. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. Supplement, Oxford. (DEDS)Google Scholar
Cingaram, K. 1968. ‘The consonantal system of Tigaḷa, a Tamil dialect’, in Krishnamurti, , 1968, 7580.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1937. ‘Phonetic observations on the Brāhūī language’, BSOS, VIII, 4, 981–3.Google Scholar
Glazov, Y. Y. 1968. ‘Non-past tense morphemes in ancient Tamil’, in Krishnamurti, , 1968, 103–9.Google Scholar
Hiremath, R. C. 1961. The structure of Kannada, Dharwar.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. 1961. Telugu verbal bases (University of California Publications in Linguistics, xxiv), Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. (ed.) 1968. Studies in Indian linguistics (Professor M. B. Emeneau ṣaṣṭipürti volume), Poona and Annamalainagar.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. 1969 (a). ‘Dravidian nasals in Brahui’, in Dravidian linguistics (seminar papers), Annamalainagar, 6574.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. 1969 (b). Koṇḍa or Kūbi, a Dravidian language (Tribal Cultural Research and Training Institute Publication 2), Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Kushalappa, Gowda, 1970. Gowda Kannada (AUDLP, 20), Annamalainagar.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, I. 1968 (a). ‘Corpus of the Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions’, in Seminar on inscriptions, 1966, Madras.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, I. 1968 (b). ‘Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions of the Sangam age’. Second International Conference-Seminar of Tamil studies, preprint, Madras.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, R. 1968. Gulbarga Kannada (Brahmin dialect), Poona.Google Scholar
Mahadeva Sastri, K. 1969. Historical grammar of Telugu [with special reference to Old Telugu, c. 200 B.O.–A.D. 1000], Anantapur.Google Scholar
Meenakshi Sundaram, T. P. 1965. A history of Tamil language, Poona.Google Scholar
Murugaiyan, K. 1970. ‘Tolkaippiyar's concept of phonetics’ (paper presented in the seminar on Tolkaippiyam, Annamalai University).Google Scholar
Ramaswamy Aiyar, L. V. 1936. ‘Materials for a sketch of TuỊu phonology’, IL, vi, 385439.Google Scholar
Sekhar, A. C. 1953. An evolution of Malayalam, Poona.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. 1967. Naccinarkkiniyar's conception of phonology (AUDLP, 10), Annamalainagar.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. 1968. The language of the Tamil inscriptions: 1350 to 1700 A. D. (unpublished—thesis submitted to Annamalai University).Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. 1969. ‘Inflectional increments in Dravidian’, in Dravidian linguistics (seminar papers), Annamalainagar, 2358.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. 1971. ‘Some problems in Old Tamil phonology’, IIJ, XIII, 1, 3143.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. In press (a). ‘Gender-number suffixes in Old Tamil nouns’.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. In press (b). Noun morphology of Dravidian.Google Scholar
Subramoniam, V. I. 1968. ‘A problem in the reconstruction of the Proto-Dravidian nasal phonemes’, in Heesterman, J. C., and others (ed.), Pratidānam: Indian, Iranian and Indo-European studies presented to F. B. J. Kuiper on his sixtieth birthday. The Hague, Paris, 344–7.Google Scholar
Tiwari, U. 1965. ‘Nasal phonemes of “Kurukh”’, IL, XXVI, 229–30.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, U. P. 1968. Nanjangud Kannada (Vakkaliga dialect), Poona.Google Scholar