Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:06:40.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cassiodorus and Rashīd al-Dīn on barbarian rule in Italy and Persia1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

D. O. Morgan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Italy in the late fifth century a.d. and Persia in the mid-thirteenth were lands of ancient and deeply-rooted culture. One had been at the centre of the western Roman Empire; the other had formed a significant part of the society of medieval Islam, and its traditions stretched back further still. Both lands found themselves invaded, conquered, and ruled by wandering ‘barbarians’, Ostrogoths and Mongols respectively, from beyond the then recognized frontiers of ‘civilization’.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 302 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 ed. Mommsen, T., MGH, Auctores Antiquissimi, XII, Berlin, 1894Google Scholar: abridged English translation by Hodgkin, T., The letters of Cassiodorus, London, 1886.Google Scholar

3 ed. Shafī', M., Lahore, 1947.Google Scholar

4 Getica, ed. Mommsen, T., MGH, Auctores Antiquissimi, V, Berlin, 1882Google Scholar; English translation by Mierow, C. C., The Gothic history of Jordanes, Princeton, 1915.Google Scholar

5 Turkestan down to the Mongol invasion, London, 1928, 46.Google Scholar

6 Brown, P. R. L.: The world of late antiquity, London, 1971, 128.Google Scholar

7 Cassiodorus's life and works are discussed e.g. by Jones, L. W., in the introduction to his translation of the Institutiones (An introduction to divine and human readings, New York, 1946, 1–64).Google Scholar

8 ibid., 8.

9 Getica, 243Google Scholar: tr. Mierow, , 119.Google Scholar

10 Getica, 290–2Google Scholar: tr. Mierow, , 135–6.Google Scholar

11 Jones, A. H. M., ‘The constitutional position of Odoacer and Theoderic’, Journal of Roman Studies, LII, 1962, 126–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I quote from the reprint in Jones, A. H. M., The Roman economy, ed. Brunt, P. A., Oxford, 1974, 367.Google Scholar

12 Getica, 294–5Google Scholar: tr. Mierow, , 136.Google Scholar

13 For a general account of the Mongol period, see Saunders, J. J.: The history of the Mongol conquests, London, 1971Google Scholar. On the invasions of Persia, Cambridge History of Iran, V, ed. Boyle, J. A., Cambridge, 1968Google Scholar, ch. iv (J. A. Boyle) and vi (I. P. Petrushevsky).

14 Al-Kāmil, ed. Tornberg, C. J., XII, Leiden, 1853, 234Google Scholar; repr. Beirut, , 1966, 358–9Google Scholar. Translation from Spuler, B., History of the Mongols, London, 1972, 30.Google Scholar

15 On Rashīd al-Din's life and works, see e.g. Boyle, J. A.'s introduction to his translation of part of the Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, The successors of Genghis Khan, New York and London, 1971, 3–13.Google Scholar

16 ibid., 3.

17 This was not an unusual conclusion for a Vazīr's career in Mongol Persia. The eventual death of Tāj ai-Din ‘Alī Shāh, still in office, in his bed, of natural causes, was noted with some surprise. Contemporaries maintained that he was the only Vazīr of the Mongols who had the good fortune to die naturally. See Mustawfī, Ḥamd Allāh, Tārīkh-i Guzīda, ed. Navā'ī, ’Abd al-Ḥusayn, Tehran, 1339/1960, 616.Google Scholar

18 Hodgkin, , Theodoric the Goth, London and New York, 1891, 162.Google Scholar

19 ibid., 25.

20 ‘Cassiodorus and Italian culture of his time’, Proceedings of the British Academy, XLI, 1955, 207–45Google Scholar. I cite the reprint in Momigliano, A., Studies in historiography, London, 1966, 183.Google Scholar

21 Llewellyn, P., Rome in the dark ages, London, 1970, 33.Google Scholar

22 Variae, V, 2Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 265.Google Scholar

23 Variae, I, 35Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Theodoric, 169–70.Google Scholar

24 Variae, IX, 25Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 412.Google Scholar

25 Brown, , op. cit., 128.Google Scholar

26 Getica, , 60Google Scholar: tr. Mierow, , 67.Google Scholar

27 Momigliano, , art. cit., 192–3.Google Scholar

28 Lewis, B., ‘The Muslim discovery of Europe’, Islam in history, London, 1973, 98.Google Scholar

29 al-Dīn, Rashīd, Histoire des Mongols de la Perse, ed. and tr. Quatremère, E., Paris, 1836, 38.Google Scholar

30 ibid., 60–2.

31 It has been inferred, from the remarkably Papacy-centred account of European history to be found in the ‘History of the Franks’, that Rashīd al-Dīn's Frankish informant was probably a cleric—perhaps a friar. See Histoire des Francs, ed. and tr. Jahn, K., Leiden, 1951.Google Scholar

32 A literary history of Persia, III, London, 1920, 68.Google Scholar

33 Tārīkh-i Ūljāytū, ed. Hambly, M., Tehran, 1969, 240.Google Scholar

34 See Levy, R., ‘The letters of Rashīd ai-Dīn Faḍl-Allāh’, JRAS, 1946, 1–2, pp. 74–8.Google Scholar

35 Anonymus Valesianus, in Marcellinus, Ammianus, ed. and tr. J. C. Rolfe (Loeb Classical Library), III, London, 1939, 546.Google Scholar

36 Momigliano, , art. cit., 190–1.Google Scholar

37 Llewellyn, , op. cit., 31Google Scholar. Cf. Lewis, C. S.: ‘His (Theodoric's) reign in Italy was not a sheer monstrosity as, say, the rule of Chaka or Dingaan in nineteenth-century England would have been. It was more as if a (popish) highland chieftain (who had acquired a little polish and a taste for claret in the French service) had reigned over the partly Protestant and partly sceptical England of Johnson and Lord Chesterfield’. (The discarded image, Cambridge, 1964, 75–6.)Google Scholar

38 Chastagnol, A., Le sénat romain sous le règne d'Odoacre, Bonn, 1966, 52Google Scholar. I owe this reference to Professor Brown.

39 ibid., 56.

40 Variae 1, 18Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 154.Google Scholar

41 Nicholas, B., An introduction to Roman law, Oxford, 1962, 122.Google Scholar

42 al-Dīn, Rashīd, History of Ghāzān Khān, ed. Jahn, K., London, 1940, 221–2Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, ed. Alizade, A., Baku, 1957, 431.Google Scholar

43 Rashīd ai-Dīn also ascribes it to the Saljūq sultan Malik Shāh.

44 ed. Jahn, , 225Google Scholar: ed. Alizade, , 434.Google Scholar

45 Schacht, J., An introduction to Islamic law, Oxford, 1964, 138Google Scholar. If in this instance Islamic law owed anything to Roman law, the enactments of Theodoric and Ghazan may possibly have a common ultimate origin. (I am indebted to Mr. Cook for this interesting suggestion.)

46 tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 259–60.Google Scholar

47 Clauson, G., An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford, 1972, 933.Google Scholar

48 See Yule, H. and Cordier, H., The book of ser Marco Polo, 1, 3rd ed., London, 1903, 433–8.Google Scholar

49 On the Mongol postal system in China, see Olbricht, P., Das postwesen in China unter der Mongolenherrschaft, Wiesbaden, 1954.Google Scholar

50 Histoire secrète des Mongols, ed. Ligeti, L., Budapest, 1971, 257–8.Google Scholar

51 Juvaynī, , Tārīkh-i Jahān Gitshā, III, ed. Qazvīnī, M., London, 1937, 76–7Google Scholar: tr. Boyle, J. A., The history of the world-conqueror, II, Manchester, 1958, 599Google Scholar. I have modified the translation slightly.

52 History of Ghāzān Khān, 271–2Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārākh, III, 480–1.Google Scholar

53 An embassy to Tamerlane, tr. Le Strange, G., London, 1928, 155–7, 177–9.Google Scholar

54 Variae, V, 14Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 273–4.Google Scholar

55 Variae, V, 39Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 287–8.Google Scholar

56 Variae, II, 38Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 191.Google Scholar

57 Variae, IV, 50Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 261–2.Google Scholar

58 Variae, IV, 36Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 253.Google Scholar

59 See below, p. 319, n. 94.

60 Mukātabāt-i Rashīdī, 12.Google Scholar

61 History of Ghāzān Khān, 251Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 460Google Scholar. See also Lambton, A. K. S., Landlord and peasant in Persia, London, 1953, repr. 1969, 83.Google Scholar

62 Geschichte der ilḫāne Abāġā bis Gaiḫātū, ed. Jahn, K., 's-Gravenhage, 1957, 68Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 209.Google Scholar

63 History of Ghāzān Khān, 246Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 455.Google Scholar

64 See Jahn, K., ‘Paper currency in Iran’, Journal of Asian History, IV, 2, 1970, 101–35.Google Scholar

65 History of Ghāzān Khān, 248Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 457.Google Scholar

66 History of Ghāzān Khān, 350Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 558Google Scholar. See also I. P. Petrushevsky in Cambridge History of Iran, V, 491.

67 History of Ghāzān Khān, 183Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 392.Google Scholar

68 History of Ghāzān Khān, 269Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 478Google Scholar. See also Petrushevsky, , op. cit., 494Google Scholar, and ‘Rashīd al-Dīn's conception of the state’, Central Asiatic Journal, XIV, 1–3, 1970, 155.Google Scholar

69 Nuzhat al-qulūb, ed. Le Strange, G., London, 1915, 27.Google Scholar

70 Mukātabāt-i Rashīdī, 33.Google Scholar

71 ibid., 274.

72 Variae, II, 5Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 173.Google Scholar

73 Variae, III, 17Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 206.Google Scholar

74 Variae, VIII, 3Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 349–50.Google Scholar

75 Variae, VIII, 26Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 375.Google Scholar

76 Variae, VII, 3Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 321–2.Google Scholar

77 Sinnigen, W. G., ‘Administrative shifts of competence under Theodoric’, Traditio, XXI, 1965, 458.Google Scholar

78 Variae, II, 27Google Scholar: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 186.Google Scholar

79 See e.g. Valesianus, Anonymus, 558–60.Google Scholar

80 The famous debate in which the Franciscan William of Rubruck argued before the Great Khān Möngke against Muslim and Buddhist spokesmen might be held to suggest more than this. See Sinica Franciscana, 1, ed. van den Wyngaert, A., Quaracchi-Firenze, 1929, 294–7.Google Scholar

81 History of Ghāzān Khān, 218Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārīkh, III, 427.Google Scholar

82 History of Ghāzān Khān, 188Google Scholar: Jāmi' al-tavārākh, III, 396–7.Google Scholar

83 tr. Budge, E. A. W., The monks of Kublai Khan, London, 1928Google Scholar. Syriac text ed. Bedjân, P., Histoire de Mâr Jab-alaha, patriarche, et de Rabban Sauma, 2nd ed., Paris, 1895.Google Scholar

84 e.g. Variae, I, 20Google Scholar; IV, 49: tr. Hodgkin, , Letters, 156; 263.Google Scholar

85 e.g. Mukātabāt-i Rashīdī, letters 17, 32, 61.

86 ibid., letters 38, 39.

87 Decline and fall of the Roman Empire, ch. xxxix.

88 Italy and her invaders, III, 2nd ed., Oxford, 1896, 247.Google Scholar

89 Early Germanic kingship in England and on the continent, Oxford, 1971, 9.Google Scholar

90 Lambton, , op. cit., 92.Google Scholar

91 op. cit., 544.

92 Jones, , op. cit., 373.Google Scholar

93 Sinnigen, , art. cit., 466.Google Scholar

94 On Mongol taxation in Persia, see Smith, J. Masson, ‘Mongol and nomadic taxation’, HJAS, XXX, 1970, 46–85Google Scholar, and the references contained therein, and Lambton, A. K. S., article arā. EI, 2nd ed. (forthcoming).Google Scholar

95 Nuzhat al-qulūb, 27.Google Scholar

96 Āmulī, Awlīyā Allāh, Tārīkh-i Rūyān, ed. Sutūda, M., Tehran, 1348/1969, 178–80.Google Scholar