¹ See Akanuma Chizen, Indo-bukkyō koyū-meishi jiten, s.v.; also Wogihara, U. (Ogihara Unrai continued by Tsuji NaoshirōKanyaku taishō Bonwa daijiten . Tokyo, 1940–1943 (reprinted and completed 1964–74). Although this work is also intended as a general Sanskrit lexicon for the use of Japanese students, the large number of words-not merely technical terms-which it cites from Chinese Buddhist translations make it a most useful work of reference for Western students of Chinese Buddhist texts.Google Scholar

² In the ‘Mahāprajāpatī-parinirvāṇa-sūtra’, translated by Po fa tsu under the Western Chin, between A.D. 290 and 306: T, 11, 144, pp. 867–9.

³ Brough, J. (ed.), The Gāndhārī Dharmapada, London, 1962.Google Scholar

⁴ Wogihara and Tsuji, op. cit., s.v.

⁵ In the numerous other examples, paḍha’i: pradhavi (prthivī), paḍhama: pradhamu (prathama), and frequently paḍi; pradi (prati), the assimilated forms are almost certainly borrowed from the Middle Indian dialect from which the Gāndhārī text was transposed. Similarly in the Niya documents pa***ichida (with many forms from the same verb) is likely to be a loanword from another Prakrit, and in other words pr- normally survives.

⁶ Cinq cents contes et apologues, 1910–11, 1934, reprinted 1962.

⁷ T'oung Pao, xxx, 1933, 97.

⁸ Méthode pour déchiffrer el transcrire les noms sanscrits, Paris, 1861, 89.Google Scholar

⁹ The latter cited from the Lalita-vistara, where the text has bi-śap-b***u (T,111, 187, p. 539a). The older translation (186, p. 483c) has the form of the name quoted by Pelliot. Both forms suggest a Middle Indian assimilation, -īv- > -śś-.

¹⁰ It is curious, however, that here also the second character has an alternative reading: see E. G. Pulleyblank, ‘The consonantal system of Old Chinese’, AM, NS, ix, 1, 1962, 121, ‘ś***ep, nep’. (In the same series, ‘ ń***ep’ is a misprint for ṇep.) It should be added that the Middle Chinese fronting of the vowel shown in P. -***e-, K. -***ā- is later than the early Buddhist transcriptions, and is therefore in general not indicated by me.

¹¹ I-ch'ieh-ching yin-i, chüan 25, 2 (also 7, 9; 15, 11), followed by Hui-lin in his work of the same name. The modern Chinese and Japanese dictionaries depend almost entirely on Hsüan-ying's account.

¹² T, LIV, 2128, p. 470c.

¹³ For other examples and discussion, see H. W. Bailey, BSOAS, x, 4, 1942, 919; xi, 4, 1946, 777; Pulleyblank, art. cit., 68, 115–16.

¹⁴ Pulleyblank, art. cit., AM, NS, IX, 2, 1963, 228 ff.

¹⁵ Brough, in Boyce, M. and Gershevitch, I. (ed.), W. B. Henning memorial volume, London, 1970, 85.Google Scholar

¹⁶ T, iv, 203. p. 447.

¹⁷ Index to the Taisho Tripiṭaka, no. 2, honnen-bu, p. 103.

¹⁸ ‘La légende de Rāma dans un avadāna chinois’, Album-Kern, 1903, 279–81; reprinted in Mémorial Sylvain Lévi, 1937, 271–4.

¹⁹ Rāmāyaṇa in China, Nagpur, 1938, reprinted 1955.

²⁰ T, 111, 152, pp. 26c–27b, also translated in Raghu Vira and Yamamoto's book.

²¹ Rāmāyaṇa, Baroda edition, 111, 11, 29 f.

²² -n for -r, see above, p. 584, n. 14.

²³ Rāmāyaṇa, 11, 57, 8, and elsewhere; Pali saddavedhī, Mahāvaṃsa 23,86; see also Edgerton, BHSD, s.v. I am indebted to Professor Minoru Hara for these references.