^{page 215 note 1} Keith, , History of Sanskrit Literature, p. 55Google Scholar.

^{page 215 note 2} Ibid., pp. 82, 83.

^{page 215 note 3} The argument from the occurrence of vv. 1 and 11 in a Buddhastava in Bali isquite inconclusive.

^{page 216 note 1} Ibid., pp. 459 ff.

^{page 216 note 2} When a really critical edition of the epic is available, it will be possible to achieve more assured results.

^{page 216 note 3} Ibid., pp. 43 ff.

^{page 217 note 1} In this specific case an Indian of the fifth century A.D. who would hardly be authoritative for Aśvaghosa's usage in any event.

^{page 218 note 2} His suspicions of i, 81; ii, 15; iv, 17, 48; v, 65; viii, 47, 48, 54; xi, 57; xiii, 23, seem wholly untenable, and to denote some lack of appreciation of AśVaghoṡa's manner. Contrast the certainly spurious ix, 47, bis; xiv, 21.

^{page 219 note 3} A feminine añjali might be suspected but this is doubtful. Cf. p. lxix.

^{page 220 note 1} In iii, 42, circ;asya need not be object as rendered.