Article contents
The way of the nomad
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Extract
Ibn Khaldūn runs the risk of being everything or nothing—or, at least, no more than this or that. It has long been customary to separate the Muqaddima or so-called Prolegomena from the body of the Kitāb al-'Ibar or so-called Universal History, and to treat them quite differently as an essay in the philosophy of history distinct from a much more commonplace amalgam of historical information of varying value. Regarded as no more than a vast compilation of historical knowledge in the manner of the time, this great bulk of the work has received much less attention than the much more famous introduction. By concentrating on Ibn Khaldūn's later career in Egypt, Fischel dwelt on the chapters dealing with the Mamlūks and the Mongols, and with Zoroastrianism, Christianity and Judaism. Treating him as an historian of the Marinids in Morocco, Shatzmiller has located the ‘Ibar as a whole in the dynastic tradition of Fes.4 The Marinids were a self-consciously Berber dynasty whose official histories fall into the well-established category of Mafākhir al-Barbar or ‘Boasts of the Berbers’, and it might be said that Ibn Khaldūn's classification of his material according to race merely reflected the origin of his magnum opus in a familiar literary tradition, from whose constraints he was only freed by the collapse of the political order in the Maghrib in the second half of the fourteenth century.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 251 - 269
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1995
References
1 cf. for example, Hitti, P. K., History of the Arabs (London and New York, 1st ed., 1937), 568Google Scholar; Gibb, H. A. R., ‘Tārīkh’, in Shaw, and Polk, (ed.), Studies on the civilization of Islam (London, 1962), 127.Google Scholar
2 Gibb, , loc. cit., 126–7.Google Scholar
3 Fischel, W. J., Ibn Khaldūn in Egypt (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967).Google Scholar
4 Shatzmiller, M., L'historiographie mérinide: Ibn Khaldūn et ses contemporains (Leiden, 1982), esp. 88–9.Google Scholar
5 The title of an anonymous fourteenth-century Moroccan work, published by Lévi-Provençal, E., Fragments historiques sur les Berbères au Moyen Age (Rabat, 1934)Google Scholar, which describes a literary tradition dating from the Kharijites in the ninth century: cf. Kitāb Ibn Sallām, ed. Schwartz, W. and Ya'qūb, Sālim ibn (Wiesbaden, 1986), 121–5.Google Scholar Cf. Schatzmiller, , Historiographie mérinide, 129–32Google Scholar, reviewed Brett, M., BSOAS, XLVIII, 2, 1985, 355–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 London, 1981; reviewed Brett, M., BSOAS, XLVI, 2, 1983, 345–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 London, 1982; reviewed Brett, M., BSOAS, loc. cit.Google Scholar
8 Histoire des Berbères, 4 vols. (Paris, 1925–1956).Google Scholar
9 Khaldūn, Ibn, Peuples et nations du monde. La conception de l'histoire. Les Arabes du Machreq et leurs contemporains. Les Arabes du Maghrib et les Berbères. Extraits des 'Ibar traduits de l'arabe et presentes par Abdesselam Cheddadi, 2 vols. (Paris, Sindbad), 1986, 659 pp.Google Scholar
10 Paris, 1983; reviewed Brett, M., BSOAS, XLK, 3, 1986, 576–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Gibb, H. A. R., ‘The Islamic background of Ibn Khaldūn's political theory’, in Shaw and Polk (ed.), Studies on the civilization of Islam, 166–75.Google Scholar
12 Mahdi, M., Ibn Khaldūn's philosophy of history (London, 1957).Google Scholar
13 See above, n. 5.
14 Kennedy, H. (London and New York, 1986).Google Scholar
15 Le passé de l'Afrique du Nord: les siècles obscurs (Paris, 1952).Google Scholar
16 ibid., ch.x, ‘Le grand fait nouveau et décisif’.
17 Lacoste, Y., Ibn Khaldoun. Naissance de l'histoire: passé du tiers monde (Paris, 1966), ch. iv.Google Scholar
18 ibid., ch. vii.
19 cf. Valensi, L., On the eve of colonialism: North Africa before the French conquest, 1790–1830 (New York, 1977), 114–16, et passim.Google Scholar
20 cf. Al-Azmeh, , Ibn Khaldūn in modern scholarshipGoogle Scholar, subtitled A study in Orientalism.
21 Studia Islamica, xxxvi, 1972, 99–111Google Scholar, reprinted as ‘Les Hilaliens au Maghreb’, in Berque, J., De l'Euphrate à l'Atlas (2 vols., Paris, 1978), 1, 55–67.Google Scholar
22 cf. Brett, M., ‘Ibn Khaldūn and the Arabisation of North Africa’, The Maghreb Review, iv, 1979, 9–16.Google Scholar
23 cf. Berque, J.. L'intérieur du Maghreb, xve-xixe siècle (Paris, 1978)Google Scholar; reviewed Brett, M., ‘Jacques Berque and the history of the Maghreb’, The Maghreb Review, IV, 1979, 140–8Google Scholar; Ulémas, fondateurs, insurgés du Maghreb, XVIIesiècle (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar
24 Dated in the extant copy, Al-sijillāt al-Mustanṣiriyya, MS, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, ed. A. Magued (Cairo, 1954), no. 5, to 455/1063; but this must be a copyist's error, since by then Mu'izz b. Bādīs, the villain whose imminent ruin is the subject of the letter, was dead.
25 Ḥayyūs, Ibn, Dīwān, ed. Bey, Mardam (Damascus, 1951), 405Google Scholar (single line only refers); no. 107, 618–26, esp. 620–2 (displaced to end of collection by mistaken dedication to subsequent patron, Maḥmūd b. Naṣr at Aleppo); no. 85, 486–94, esp. 489–92.
26 For the analysis of the sijill in this sense, see Brett, M., ‘Fatimid historiography: a case study—the quarrel with the Zirids. 1048–58’, in Morgan, D. O. (ed.), Medieval historical writing in the Christian and Islamic worlds (London, 1982), 47–59.Google Scholar
27 cf. Brett, M., ‘The Zughba at Tripoli, 429H (1037–8 a.d.)’, Society for Libyan Studies, Sixth Annual Report, 1974–1975, 41–7.Google Scholar
28 Ḥawqal, Ibn, Ṣūrat al-arḍ., ed. Kramers, J. H. (Leiden, 1938), 155Google Scholar; transl. Kramers, J. H. and Wiet, G., Configuration de la terre (2 vols., Beirut and Paris, 1964), 1, 153.Google Scholar
29 al-Ṣayrafī, Ibn, Al-ishāra ilā man nāla al-wizāra, Bull, de l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale, xxv (Cairo, 1924), 41–2Google Scholar; Muyassar, Ibn, Annales d'Egypte (les Khalifes Fatimides), ed. Massé, (Cairo, 1919), 5–6, 9.Google Scholar
30 cf. Brett, , ‘Fatimid historiography’, 56–7.Google Scholar The story that he brought about the devastation of Ifrīqiya is coupled with the accusation that he sent all the wealth of Egypt for the conquest of Baghdad, and thereby invited a Seljūq offensive: reckless incompetence in the East to match arrogant over-reaction in the West.
31 Especially visible in Maqrīzī, , Itti'āẓ al-ḥunafā', ed. Shayyāl, and Aḥmad, (3 vols., Cairo, 1967–1973), II, 214–15.Google Scholar
32 Al-Tijānī, , Riḥla (Tunis, 1958), 19–21Google Scholar: narrative ascribed to Ibn Bassām, found abbreviated in al-Marrākushī, Ibn ‘Idhārī, Al-Bayān al-mughrib fī akhbār al-Maghrib, i, ed. Colin, G. S. and Lévi-Provençal, E. (Leiden, 1948), 288Google Scholar, in passage summarizing Ibn Sharaf. It is likely that the tale of the wazīr, wrongly identified as al-Yāzūrī's predecessor al-Jarjarā'ī, had been introduced into the original text by Ibn Sharaf's son Ja'far, writing in Spain about the time of Ibn Bassām: Bashkuwāl, Ibn, Al-Ṣila fī'l-ta'rīkh a'immat al-Andalus, ed. Codera, , Bibliotheca Arabico-Hispana (2 vols., Madrid, 1883), II, 546–7, no. 1208Google Scholar; ed. Istanbul, , 1955, 1, 129–30Google Scholar, no. 298. Cf. Brett, M., ‘Fitnat al-Qayrawān’, Ph.D. thesis, London, 1970, 193–8Google Scholar, and idem, ‘The Flood of the Dam and the Sons of the New Moon’, in Mélanges offerts à Mohamed Talbi (La Manouba, 1993), 55–67.Google Scholar
33 al-Athīr, Ibn, Kitāb al-kāmil (Cairo, 1301 a.h.), IX, 235–7Google Scholar; (Beirut, 1968), VIII, 55–6; year 442. Ibn Shaddād must be the common source for his account of the two separate battles of Jandarān (sic), and for Ibn ‘Idhārī's similar narrative of the one encounter in two consecutive versions, the first ascribed to Ibn Sharaf and the second to the early twelfth-century Zirid historian Abū ‘l-Salt: Bayān, 1, 289–93.Google Scholar Cf. Brett, , ‘Fitnat al-Qayrawān’, 399–404.Google Scholar
34 Al-Nuwayrī, , Historia de los musulmanes de España y Africa (extract from Nihāyat al-arab), ed. and transl. Remiro, G. (2 vols., Granada, 1917–1919), II, 140–6Google Scholar; ‘l-Fidā’, Abū, Kitāb al-Mukhtaṣar fī akhbār al-bashar (4 vols., Cairo, 1325 a.h.), II, 179.Google Scholar
35 Kitāb al-'Ibar (7 vols., Būlāq, 1284 a.h.) vi, 13–16Google Scholar; Histoire des Berbères, 1, 33–7Google Scholar; Peuples et nations, II, 429–35.Google Scholar Cf. Brett, , ‘Fitnat al-Qayrawān’, 415.Google Scholar
36 ‘Ibar, vi, 14Google Scholar; Qur'ān, , 54: 7.Google Scholar
37 Dīwān, 620, 490.Google Scholar
38 Bayān, 1, 296.Google Scholar
39 Al-‘Umarī, MS Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, no. 2327, f. 44v; Brett, , ‘Fitnat al-Qayrawān’, 493–5.Google Scholar
40 cf. al-Nuwayrī, , Historia de los Musulmanes, II, 101–4Google Scholar; Idris, H. R., La Berbérie orientale sous les Zirides (2 vols., Paris, 1962), 5–7Google Scholar; Norris, H. T., The Berbers in Arabic literature (London and New York, 1982), 35–9, 107, 254–5.Google Scholar
41 For these genealogies, cf. Nicholson, R. A., A literary history of the Arabs (London, 1907, repr. Cambridge, 1930), XVII–XXIGoogle Scholar; Cheddadi, , Ibn Khaldūn, 149–56, 286–93.Google Scholar
42 Qur'ān, , 34: 15–19.Google Scholar For the legend of the Ma'rib dam, cf. Nicholson, , Literary history, 14–17Google Scholar; Hitti, P. K., History of the Arabs (London and New York, 1937, many eds.), 64–5.Google Scholar
43 Dīwan, 491.Google Scholar
44 Nājī, Ibn, Ma'ālim al-īmān (Tunis, 1320 a.h.), 15–18Google Scholar; Bassām, Ibn, Al-Dhakhīra (Cairo, 1939–1945), iv/I, 177–9, 181, 182–3, 184, 185.Google Scholar
45 cf. Monroe, J. T., The Shu'ūbiyya in al-Andalus: the Risāla of Ibn Garcia and five refutations (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 1970), Introduction, 9–12, 16–17Google Scholar; ‘Epistle’, 23, 26Google Scholar; ‘Fourth refutation’, 83Google Scholar; reviewed Brett, M., BSOAS, xxxiv, 2, 1971, 407–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Tijānī, , Rihla, 18.Google Scholar Cf. also Bassām, Ibn, Dhakhīra, iv/I 133Google Scholar: the flood of strife that tossed about the nobility of Qayrawān and obliterated its traces.
47 Annales, 9.Google Scholar
48 Qur'ān, , 54: 9–16.Google Scholar
49 Qur'ān, , 7: 133.Google Scholar
50 cf. Brett, , ‘Flood of the Dam’.Google Scholar
51 Riḥla, 21Google Scholar; repeated by Khaldūn, Ibn, above, n. 35.Google Scholar
52 Al-Bakrī, , Description de l'Afrique septentrionale, ed. and tr. de Slane, (2 vols., Algiers, 1911–1913, repr. Paris, 1965), 18, transl. 43.Google Scholar
53 cf. Ayoub, A., ‘The Hilālī epic: material and memory’, Revue d'Histoire Maghrébine, XI, 35–36, 1984, 189–217Google Scholar. An entire Tunisian version has been recorded and translated by Saada, L., La geste hilalienne: version de Bou Thadi (Tunisie) (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
54 Mukhlis, F. A., ‘Studies and comparison of the cycles of the Banū Hilāl romance’, Ph.D, London, 1964.Google Scholar
55 The Muqaddimah: an introduction to history, tr. Rosenthal, F. (3 vols., 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ, 1967), III, 415–20Google Scholar; Peuples et nations, II, 439–42.Google Scholar
56 cf. Norris, H. T., The adventures of Antar (Warminster, Wilts., 1980), esp. 23–30Google Scholar; idem, ‘The rediscovery of the ancient sagas of the Banū Hilāl’, BSOAS, LI, 3, 1988, 462–81.Google Scholar
57 ibid.
58 La geste hilalienne, 347–8.Google Scholar
59 cf. Brett, M., ‘Arabs, Berbers and Holy Men in southern Ifriqiya, 650–750/1250–1350 a.d.’, Cahiers de Tunisie, XXIX, 1981, 533–59.Google Scholar
60 cf. Brett, M., ‘Ibn Khaldūn and the dynastic approach to local history: the case of Biskra’, Al-Qanṭara, XII, 1991, 157–80.Google Scholar
61 cf. e.g. Brett, , ‘Arabs, Berbers and Holy Men’, 543.Google Scholar
62 cf. the examples quoted by Khaldūn, Ibn, Muqaddimah, III, 420–37.Google Scholar
63 cf. Brett, , ‘Ibn Khaldūn and the case of Biskra’.Google Scholar
64 cf. Rozet, C.-A. and Carette, E., Algérie (Paris, 1850), 117Google Scholar; Ageron, Ch.-R., Modern Algeria: a history from 1830 to the present, ed. and tr. Brett, M. (London, 1991), 4, n. 11.Google Scholar
65 cf. Ayoub, A., “The Hilālī epic’Google Scholar, which analyses the purpose of the storytelling for the audience. ‘Umar al-Mukhtar, the leader of the resistance to the Italians in Cyrenaica, appears to have been celebrated in this way.
66 cf. Wansbrough, J., ‘The decolonization of North African history’, Journal of African History, ix, 1968, 643–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67 Carette, E., Recherches sur l'origine et les migrations des principales tribus de l'Afrique septentrionale (Paris, 1853), 399.Google Scholar
68 cf. Poncet, J., ‘Le mythe de la “catastrophe” hilalienne’, Annales ESC, XXII, 1967, 1099–120Google Scholar; Laroui, A., L'histoire de Maghreb (Paris, 1970), 139–46.Google Scholar
69 cf. e.g. Peters, E., ‘The proliferation of segments in the lineage of the Bedouin of Cyrenaica’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, XC, 1960, 29–53.Google Scholar
70 ibid.
71 cf. Brett, , ‘Arabs, Berbers and Holy Men’, 541–5.Google Scholar
72 He reports, for example, that a group formed out of unrelated fractions had converted the term ziyāda, ‘increase’, which described their origin, into Yazīd, the name of their eponymous ancestor: ibid., 542.
73 ibid., 543–5.
74 ibid., 544–6.
75 cf. Brett, , ‘Ibn Khald¯n and the case of Biskra’.Google Scholar
76 Muqaddimah, I, 308–10; II, 335–6.Google Scholar
77 Muqaddimah, (120–2).Google Scholar
78 For the traditional details, cf. Idris, H. R., La Berbérie orientale sous les Zirides (Paris, 1962), chs. iv–vi.Google Scholar
79 cf. Lecker, M., The Banū Sulaym (Jerusalem, 1989).Google Scholar
80 Muqaddimah, I, 80–3Google Scholar; frontispiece, vol. II.
81 cf. Ageron, , Modern Algeria, 3, 22, 33 and n.2.Google Scholar
82 cf. Parsons, F. V., The origins of the Morocco question 1800–1900 (London, 1976), 6–8Google Scholar; Burke, Edmund III, ‘The image of the Moroccan state in French ethnological literature: a new look at the origin of Lyautey's Berber policy’, in Gellner, E. and Micaud, Ch. (ed.), Arabs and Berbers (London, 1973), 175–99, esp. 183–5.Google Scholar
83 cf. Pennell, C. R., ‘Tyranny, just rule, and Moroccan political thought’, Morocco. Occasional Papers No.1, Society for Moroccan Studies, Centre of Near and Middle Eastern Studies (London: SOAS, 1994), 13–42.Google Scholar
84 cf. Brett, M., ‘The unification of North Africa by Islam in the seventh to thirteenth centuries’Google Scholar, ibid., 3–12.
85 Personal communication from M. Ben Baaziz, Director of the National Archaeological Survey, Tunis. Cf. Brett, , ‘Arabs, Berbers and Holy Men’, 534, 536–7.Google Scholar
86 ibid., 538–41, 546–7; Brett, , ‘Biskra’, 174, 178.Google Scholar
87 Ageron, , Modern Algeria, 22Google Scholar, quoting Daumas, Director of Arab Affairs, 1841–47.
88 ibid., 65.
89 cf. the studies of von Sivers, P.: ‘Insurrection and accommodation: indigenous leadership in Eastern Algeria, 1840–1900’, The International journal of Middle East Studies, vi, 1975, 259–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Les plaisirs du collectionneur: capitalisme fiscal et chefs indigènes en Algerie (1840–1860)’, Annales ESC, XXXV, 1980, 679–99, 865Google Scholar; ‘Algerian landownership and rural leadership, 1860–1914: a quantitative approach’, Maghreb Review, IV, 2, 1979, 59–62Google Scholar; ‘Indigenous administrators in Algeria, 1846–1914: manipulation and manipulators’, Maghreb Review, VII, 1982, 116–21.Google Scholar
90 Peuples et nations, II, 453–61.Google Scholar
91 cf. Norris, H., The Arab conquest of the western Sahara (Harlow, Essex, 1986), chs. ii, iii.Google Scholar
92 ibid. ch. ix; cf. , C. C. with Stewart, E. K., Islam and social order in Mauritania (Oxford, 1973), 54–65.Google Scholar
93 Marçais, W., ‘Comment l'Afrique du Nord a été arabisée’, Annales de l'Institut des Etudes Orientales, Algiers, iv, 1938, 1–2; XIV, 1956, 5–17.Google Scholar
94 Muqaddimah, III, 348–52.Google Scholar
95 ibid., I, 300.
96 ibid., I, 299.
97 ibid., I, 267–8.
98 ibid., III, 342.
99 ibid., II, 305–7.
100 ibid., III, 344–67.
101 Peuples et nations, I, 139.Google Scholar
102 Peuples et nations, II, 469–70.Google Scholar
103 Muqaddimah, I, 273–4.Google Scholar
104 ibid., 267–8.
- 5
- Cited by