^{page 72 note 1} JAOS, LXXX, 4, 1960, 328–9Google Scholar.

^{page 72 note 2} TP, XVII, 1916, 512Google Scholar.

^{page 72 note 3} Tibetisch-deutsches Wōrterbuch, St. Petersburg, 1841.

^{page 72 note 4} Berlin, 1957 (Abhandlungen d. Deutschen Akad. d. Wiss. zu Berlin. Klasse fur Sprachen, Literatur u. Kunst, Jahrg. 1952, Nr. 3).

^{page 72 note 5} Thomas, op. cit., VI, 11 (p. 120); cf. p. 130, n. 2.

^{page 72 note 6} ibid., VI, 63 (not 6, as given in the Tibetan vocabulary, p. 174), (p. 123); cf. p. 133, n. 7. and see also here below, p. 79.

^{page 72 note 7} Ibid., p. 143, 1 a 3.

^{page 72 note 8} Essay towards a dictionary, Tibetan and English, Calcutta, 1834Google Scholar.

^{page 73 note 1} See below under I.

^{page 73 note 2} C‘os-kyi sbyin-pa spel-ba’i p‘yir-du Kal-kud-ta-na’ Bab-tist-Mis-si-’on-gyi par-k‘a -du par-du bsgrubs-pa'o.

^{page 73 note 3} Bacot, J., ‘Titres et colophons d'ouvrages non canoniques tibétains’, BEFEO, XLIV, 2, 1954, 275–337Google Scholar.

^{page 73 note 4} Ts'ogs-bźi-sogs dge-’dun-gyi sde ji-ltar byuf -ba da źu-lan par-du bzugs-pa’i skabs. See Roerich, G. N., The blue annals, Pts. I and II, Calcutta, 1949–53Google Scholar, introduction, esp. p. lv, and pp. 1091, etc.

^{page 73 note 5} See his remark s.v. bdag-rkyen (p. 269) ‘as yet not found in books’.

^{page 73 note 6} The lithographed Romanized Tibetan and English dictionary, Kyelang in British Lahoul, 1866.

^{page 73 note 7} Handwōrterbueh der Tibetischen Sprache, Gnadau, 1871.

^{page 73 note 8} The italics are mine.

^{page 74 note 1} See above, p. 72. The ju occurring in connexion with śi -par (Thomas, op. cit., p. 130, n. 2) might perhaps be connected with źu in źu-dag ‘correction’, źu-c'en ‘great corrector’, which would confirm the meaning ‘printing block’ (rather than simply ‘wooden mould’) in the passage.

^{page 74 note 2} op. cit., p. 81: ‘the wooden table or block to cut types on’.

^{page 74 note 3} See Jest, C., ‘A technical note on the Tibetan method of block-carving’, Man, LXI, No. 102, 1961, p. 84Google Scholar.

^{page 74 note 4} Kowalewski, J. E., Dictionnaire nwngol-russe-français, III, Kazan, 1849, p. 2040Google Scholar, ‘planche typographique de bois’.

^{page 74 note 5} The inclusion of Laufer's etymology s.v. bar in Professor Lessing's, F. D.recent Mongolians-English dictionary, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1960, p. 82Google Scholar, may result in giving it another lease of life.

^{page 74 note 6} op. cit., II, 1846, p. 1092.

^{page 74 note 7} See H. Ui and others, Complete catalogue of the Tibetan Buddhist canon, Sendai, 1934Google Scholar, Nos. 4182 and 4190.

^{page 74 note 8} The page references for the verse in question are as follows: I Narthang Tanjur: (a) mDo, vol. 33 (Gi), p. 67B⁷. (b) mDo, vol. 94 (), pp. 283A⁷–283B¹. II Tibetan Tripiṭaka: (a) vol. 103, p. 215–3 (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 33 (Gi), p. 78A⁷). (b) vol. 129, p. 237–1 (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 94 (), p. 287A¹–²).

^{page 75 note 1} Suhṛllekha Brief des Nāgārjuna an König Udayana. Aus dem Tibetischen übersetzt. Leipzig, 1886 (see p. 18).

^{page 75 note 2} ‘Bçes pai phrin yig (“Friendly epistle”)’, Journal of the Pali Text Society, 1886 (see p. 20).

^{page 75 note 3} The Dictionnaire thibétain-latin-français par les Missionnaires catholiques du Thibet, generally referred to as ‘Desgodin's dictionary’, Hongkong, 1899, p. 565Google Scholar, takes Jäschke's entry over as follows: ‘nems (J.) Paululum sedere, s'asseoir, se reposer un peu (!)’.

^{page 75 note 4} R. Sakaki , Bonzō-kanwa-yoyaku-tailcō honyaku Myōgi-taishū (Mahāvyutpati), 2 vols., Kyōto, 1916–25, vol. I, p. 437. Cf. also, for the Sanskrit version, I. P. Minaev, Mahāvyutpatti (Bibliotheca Buddhica, XIII), St. Petersburg, 1911, Nos. 245, 366/7 (p. 87), and, for the Chinese version, U. Wogihara , Bonkan-taiyaku Buhkyō-jiten , rev. ed., Tōkyō, 1927 (reprinted, Tōkyō, Sankibō, 1959), Nos. 366/7 (p. 178).

^{page 75 note 5} An alternative form of spor-ba, see below, p. 78.

^{page 76 note 1} Tanjur, mDo, vol. 123 (Go), p. 338A¹.

^{page 76 note 2} Derge Tanjur, Ui's Catalogue (see above, p. 74, n. 7), No. 4346, p. 96B^3–4. The Coni Tanjur has, according to Dr. Hamm, as far as the Mahāvyutpatti is concerned, the same pagination as the Derge Tanjur.

^{page 76 note 3} Vol. 144, p. 58–2 (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 123 (Go), p. 282B^1–2).

^{page 76 note 4} Ui's Catalogue, No. 4035. The page reference for the passage in question is as follows: Narthang Tanjur, mDo, vol. 49 (Dzi), p. 49B^5–6.

Tibetan Tripiṭaka, vol. 109, p. 234–3 (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 49 (Dzi) p. 55B^5–6).

I wish to thank Mr. Richard S. Y. Ch'i for directing my attention to the Chinese version of this passage (Taishō Tripiṭaka, vol. 30, No. 1579, p. 298 b²⁹–c¹), which, however, shows certain differences.

^{page 76 note 5} cf. also the passage from the Abhidharmakośa-ṭīkā lakṣaṇānusāriṇī quoted p. 77, n. 7.

^{page 76 note 6} Kowalewski, op. cit., n, p. 616, gives nem-nem as Tibetan equivalent of Mongol , and nem-nem byed-pa as equivalent of Mongol . Lessing, op. cit., has s.v. namulzaxu (p. 563) the example modun sola namulzamui ‘the wooden floor is shaking’.

^{page 77 note 1} Ui's Catalogue, No. 4190. The page reference for the passage in question is as follows: Narthang Tanjur, mDo, vol. 94 (), p. 348A^2–3.

Tibetan Tripiṭaka, vol. 129, p. 265–1 (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 94 (), p. 357A^1–2).

^{page 77 note 2} Ui's Catalogue, No. 4090.

^{page 77 note 3} Narthang Tanjur, mDo, vol. 63 (Gu), p. 162B^4–5.

^{page 77 note 4} Tibetan Tripiṭaka, vol. 115, p. 185–1Google Scholar (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 63 (Gu), p. 172A^1–2).

^{page 77 note 5} L'Abhidharma-kośa de Vasubandhu, III° chapitre, Paris, 1926, p. 162Google Scholar.

^{page 77 note 6} Taishō Tripiṭaka, vol. 29, No. 1558, p. 59c^26–27.

^{page 77 note 7} TheAbhidharmakośa-ṭīkā lakṣaṇānusāriṇī (C‘os mdzod-kyi ’grel-bśad mts‘annyid-kyi rjes-su ’, Ui's Catalogue, No. 4093), has, however, nem and spar, see Tibetan Tripiṭaka, vol. 117, p. 243–4 (reproducing Peking Tanjur, mDo, vol. 67 (Ju), p. 393B^4–5) , and Narthang Tanjur, vol. 67 (Ju), p. 388A^2–3: nem ẓes byed-pa spar ẓes byed ces bya-ba ni / nem ẓes byed-pa spar ẓes byed-pa'i -ts‘ul yin-no ẓes bya-ba'i t‘a-ts‘ig go//.

^{page 77 note 8} p. 356.

^{page 78 note 1} See Laufer's, ‘Skizze der mongolischen Iiteratur’, Keleti Szemle, VIII, 1907, 181Google Scholar.

^{page 78 note 2} Bod-Hor-gyi brda-yig ts‘ig don gsum gsal-bar byed-pa mun sel sgron-me. (Töbed-Mongyolun dokiyan-u bičik. Ner-e üge udq-a yurban-i todurayulun qarangyui-yi arilyayci .) (Corpus Scriptorum Mongolorum, Vols. VI–VII.) 2 vols., Ulan Bator, 1959. See vol. 2,16.

^{page 78 note 3} cf. Mahāvyutpatti (Sakaki), No. 6704: utplutya: rgal-ba ‘am .

^{page 78 note 4} Heissig, W., Die Pekinger lamaistischen Blockdrucke in mongolischer Sprache (Gottinger Asiatische Forschungen, Bd. 2), Wiesbaden, 1954, p. 165Google Scholar, No. 210.

^{page 78 note 5} The same vowel alternation can be observed in the case of by the side of , sprad-pa by the side of sprod-pa, and spyad-pa by the side of spyod-pa; cf. also by the side of -ba and -ba.

^{page 78 note 6} See above, p. 77.

^{page 79 note 1} The two others are the Bod-kyi brda-yig rtogs-par sla-ba, mentioned above (p. 78), and the ‘Four language mirror’ (Yuh-jyh syhtii chingwenjiann ).

^{page 79 note 2} See Heissig, op. cit., p. 43, No. 47. The full Tibetan title, not quoted there, is: Dag-yig c‘gdul-bya'i mun sel-byed nyi-ma ’od.

^{page 79 note 3} Heissig, op. cit., p. 43, No. 45.

^{page 79 note 4} op. cit., p. 133, n. 7.

^{page 79 note 5} See above, p. 72.

^{page 79 note 6} op. cit., p. 143, 1 a 3.

^{page 80 note 1} (Yuh-jyh)wmutii chingtvenjiann .

^{page 80 note 2} The Chinese compound entered the Tibetan language also as a loan-word (spar k'a), see Laufer, , ‘Loan-words in Tibetan’, TP, XVII, 1916, p. 509Google Scholar, No. 230.

^{page 80 note 3} Okayama, 1954.

^{page 80 note 4} Taishō Tripiṭaka, vol. 17, No. 784. About the ‘Four language edition’, see Heissig, op. cit., p. 149, No. 160.

^{page 80 note 5} Chinese title: Ger-shi Chiu-jar , Tzanqwen-tsyrdean Peking, 1957. The work was first printed in Lhasa in 1949.

^{page 80 note 6} cf. Hauer, B., Handwōrterbuch der Mandschusprache, 1952, p. 99Google Scholar, who refers to the Chingwenbuuhuey for this term, which he translates as ‘Hofbuchdruckerei’. śuwaselambi (from Chinese shua [for yinnshua]) is an obvious Manchu neologism.