Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:21:46.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rediscovering the ‘Oriental’ in the Orient and Europe: new books on the East-West cultural interface: a review article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Vladimir I. Braginsky
Vladimir I. Braginsky
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The literature on the cultural interrelations of East and West published up to the present time is enormous. Even so, every new scholarly study in this field cannot but provoke interest, so important is the topic, particularly today in the era of so-called globalization. The books under review here, edited and introduced by Andrew Gerstle (SOAS) and Anthony Milner (ANU),1 are based on papers presented at conferences held by the Humanities Research Centre of the Australian National University. The theme of the conferences—‘Europe and the Orient‘—attracted a great number of specialists in art history, musicology, anthropology and history, Asianists and Europeanists, from Europe, the United States and Australia. It is worth noting that the most of the papers are based on published works in which their authors have discussed the same or closely related topics. In presenting the principal ideas of those publications, these collections of papers form a ‘miniature library’ of works on East-West comparative cultural studies. The interdisciplinarity of the articles—their extraordinary ‘polyphony’, the diversity of their often mutually contradictory and polemical approaches, judgements and evaluations—reveals the complexity, multifacetedness and theoretical difficulties which are only too characteristic of the study of comparative culture. The reader is here provided with quite a complete picture of the contemporary state of the field, as well as of the strong and weak sides of its investigations. This breadth of coverage is one of the main strengths of the volumes.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , October 1997 , pp. 511 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexeyev, V. M. 1978. Kitayskaya literatura. Izbranniye trudy. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Ardalan, N. and Bakhtiar, L. 1973. The sense of unity. The Sufi tradition in Persian architecture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Attas, Syed M. N. 1971. Concluding postscript to the origin of the Malay sha'ir. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1979. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moscow: Iskusstvo.Google Scholar
Braginsky, V. I. 1991. Problemy tipologii srednevekovykh literatur Vostoka: ocherki kul'turologicheskogo izucheniya literatury. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Braginsky, V. I. 1993. ‘Traditional literatures and literary traditions. Russian Southeast Asian literary studies in 1980–1990: approaches and research works’, NIASnytt. Nordic Newsletter of Asian Studies, 4:15–20.Google Scholar
Braginsky, V. I. 1993a. The system of classical Malay literature. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Braginsky, V. I. and Chelyshev, Ye. P. (ed.) 1985. Khudozhestvennye traditsii literatur vostoka i sovremennost’: Rannie formy traditsionalizma. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Braginsky, V. I. and Chelyshev, Ye. P. (ed.) 1986. Khudozhestvennye traditsii literatur vostoka i sovremennost’. Traditsionalizm na sovremennom etape. (Moscow: Nauka.)Google Scholar
Chari, V. K. 1946. Whitman in the light of Vedantic mysticism. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. 1919. Heretics. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, A. 1956. Christian and Oriental philosophy of art. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, A. 1956a. The transformation of nature in art. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Florensky, P. A. 1993. Ikonostas. Izbranniye trudy po iskusstvu. St Petersburg: MIFRIL-Russkaya Kniga.Google Scholar
Gordon, G. (ed. and tr.) 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, Michel Foucault. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, M. K. 1962. An autobiography: the story of my experiments with truth. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Gurevich, A. J. 1985. Categories of medieval culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gurevich, A. J. 1991. Medieval popular culture: problems of beliefs and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. 1988. A poetics of postmodernism: history, theory, fiction. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. V. 1988. ‘Eizenshtein i kultury Yaponii i Kitaya’, in Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii. Moscow: Nauka: 279–290.Google Scholar
Konrad, N. I. 1926. ‘Teatr No’, Vremennik Instituta istorii iskusstv, 3: 38–67.Google Scholar
Konrad, N. I. 1927. ‘Dramaticheskaya kompozitsiya No’, in N. I. Konrad, Yaponskaya literatura v obraztsakh i ocherkakh. Vol. 2. Leningrad: Institut Zhivykh Vostochnykh Yazykhov im. A. S. Yenukidze: 361–73. [With translations of two plays 374–412.]Google Scholar
Konrad, N. I. 1929. ‘Yaponskiy teatr’, in Mervart, A. M. (ed.), Vostochniy teatr. Leningrad: Academia, p. 268–392.Google Scholar
Kozhinov, V. V. 1962. ‘Vul'garniy sotsiologizm’, in Surkov, A. A. (ed.), Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 1. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya: 1062–3.Google Scholar
Levin, I. Kh. 1967. Etana: Shumero-akkadskoye predaniye. Istochnikovedcheskoye issledovaniye. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Medvedev, P. N. (= M. M. Bakhtin). 1928. Formal'niy metod v literaturovedenii: kriticheskoye vvedeniye v sotsiologicheskuyu poetiku. Leningrad: Priboy.Google Scholar
Mgebrov, A. A. 1932. Zhizn' v teatre. Vol. 2. Moscow-Leningrad: Priboy.Google Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed H. 1975. Islam and the plight of modern man. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. 1948. The dehumanization of art and notes on the novel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1939. Studies in iconology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1951. Gothic architecture and scholasticism. Latrobe: Archabbey Press.Google Scholar
Poggioli, R. 1968. The theory of Avant-garde. Cambridge, Mass, and London: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pronko, L. C. 1967. Theatre East and West: perspectives toward a total theatre. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reed, J. T. 1965. Indian influences in American literature and thought. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Said, E. 1991. Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin Books. [First published by Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.]Google Scholar
Shifman, A. I. 1971. Lev Tolstoy i Vostok. 2nd revised ed. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Suvorova, A. A. 1987. ‘Vostochniy teatr i zapadnoyevropeyskiy avangard’, in Chelyshev, Ye. P. (ed.), Vzaimodeystviye kul'tur Vostoka i Zapada. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zavadskaya, Ye. V. 1977. Kul'tura Vostoka v sovremennom zapadnom mire. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zoetmulder, P. 1974. Kalangwan: a survey of Old Javanese literature. (KITLV. Translation Series 16.) The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zykova, Ye. P. 1987. ‘Vostok v tvorchestve poetov “Ozernoy shkoly”’, in: Chelyshev, Ye. P. (ed.), Vzaimodeystviye kul'tur Vostoka i Zapada. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar