Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:09:58.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Position and Power of the Mamlūk Sultan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

P. M. Holt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I could not say much of the Mamalucs, of whom I know no author that has written in particular: neither did they deserve that any should. For they were a base sort of people, a Colluvies of slaves, the scum of all the East, who, having treacherously destroyed the Jobidae, their Masters, reigned in their stead; and bating that they finished the expulsion of the Western Christians out of the East (where they barbarously destroyed Tripoli, and Antioch, and several other Cities) they scarce did anything worthy to be recorded in History.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 237 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Anon., The life of the Reverend Humphrey Prideaux, D.D., Dean of Norwich, London, 1748, 268–9.Google Scholar

2 Al-Maqrīzī, , al-Sulūk, i, pt. ii, Cairo, 1956, 369.Google Scholar

3 Ibn Taghrībirdī, al-Nujūm al-zāhira, vii, Cairo, n.d., 4–5.

4 Lane-Poole, Stanley, The Mohammadan dynasties, Paris, 1925, 83.Google Scholar

5 Précis de l'histoire d'Égypte, ii, Le Caire, 1932, 238.

6 Ibn al-Dawādārī, Kanz al-durar, vii, Cairo, 1973, 5; Ulrich Haarmann, Quellenstudien zur frühen Mamlukenzeit, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1970, p. 229, n. 3.

7 Nujūm, VII, 273.

8 Ibn 'Abd al-Zāhir, Tashrif al-ayyām, Cairo, 1961, 94–5.

9 Tashrif, 110.

10 Kanz al-durar, ix, Cairo, I960, 126.

11 Nujūm, xi, 6.

12 Nujūm, ix, 261.

13 Nujūm, VII, 104, 294; viii, 19; cf. Kanz al-durar, viii, Cairo, 1971, 348.

14 Sulūk, I, pt. ii, wa-ḥalafū lahu wa ‘stahlafū al-’askar.

15 S. F. Sadeque, Baybars the First of Egypt, Dacca, 1956, 17 (Arabic text).

16 Cited in Nujūm, viii, 99.

17 Ismā‘il Ab ū'1-Fid’, al-Mulclttasar fī akhbār al-basltar, Cairo, n.d., iv, 34.

18 Al-Qalqashandī, Ṣubḥ al-a'shā, Cairo, n.d., iv, 7.

19 C. H. Becker, ‘ Le “ Ghashiya ” comme embleme de la royauté ’, Centenario della nascita di Michele Amari, Palermo, 1910, 148–51. Cf. [E.] Quatremére, Histoire des sultans mamelouhs de l'Égypte, I, I, Paris, 1837, p. 3, n. 7.Google Scholar

20 Nujūm, vi, 124, 306.

21 Mukhtaṣar, Vi, 87; Quatremerè, op. cit., n. 7 at p. 6.

22 Sadeque, Baybars, 35–41, 61–3 (Arabic text).

23 NujŪm, x, 4–5.

24 Kanz al-durar, viii, 34, 38, 45.

25 Sadeque, Baybars, 9–10, 31 (Arabic text).

26 NujŪm, vii, 87.

27 Kanz al-durar, viii, 40–3.

28 Kanz al-durar, viii, 271–6; cf. ibid., VII, 8–9.

28 Sadeque, Baybars, 62 (Arabic text).

30 cf. S. M. Stern, ‘ Petitions from the Mamlūk period ’, BSOAS, xxix, 2, 1966, 268–75.

31 Nujūm, VIII, 262.